Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Armstrong v. Commerce”
Armstrong v. Department of Commercepublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JOSEPH ARMSTRONG, Plaintiff, Case No. 24-cv-3185 (JMC) v. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, Defendant. ORDER For the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant’s motion to dismiss, ECF 24, is GRANTED, and this cas
Armstrong v. Department of Commercepublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JOSEPH ARMSTRONG, Plaintiff, Case No. 24-cv-3185 (JMC) v. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter is before the Court for review of Plaintiff Joseph Armstrong’s pro se complaint for emplo
Armstrong v. Commerce Tankers Corp.public domain
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Armstrong v. Commerce Tankers Corp.public domain
OPINION AND ORDER LEVET, District Judge. This is a motion for judgment N.O.V. for defendants after a Special Verdict holding defendants liable to plaintiff for negligence in a seaman’s action for personal injuries. A copy of the Special Verdict is hereto appended. Under Rule 42(b), liability was tried first. Also, at the conclusion of the trial on damages in the above-entitled acti
Com. v. Armstrongpublic domain
Affirmed.
Com. v. Armstrongpublic domain
Affirmed
Com. v. Armstrongpublic domain
Affirmed.
Com. v. Armstrongpublic domain
CP-51-CR-0003229-2010 (Philadelphia) Affirmed
Com. v. Armstrongpublic domain
Affirmed - Application to Withdraw as Counsel Granted.
Com. v. Armstrongpublic domain
CP-51-CR-0003229-2010 (Philadelphia) Affirmed
Com. v. Armstrongpublic domain
CP-51-CR-0003229-2010 (Philadelphia) Affirmed
Com. v. Armstrongpublic domain
CP-51-CR-0003229-2010 (Philadelphia) Affirmed
Com. v. Armstrongpublic domain
Affirmed.
Com. v. Armstrongpublic domain
Affirmed CP-23-CR-0006618-2011 (Delaware)
Com. v. Armstrongpublic domain
Affirmed Application to Withdraw as Counsel Granted CP-36-CR-0002999-2015 (Lancaster)
ANDERSON, Circuit Judge. The plaintiff, Ernest A. Armstrong, newly signed on as a seaman aboard defendant’s vessel, SS Thalia, went off duty at 0800 April 20, 1967, while the ship was anchored in Singapore harbor. On invitation he went to the quarters of a shipmate, named Darcy, and sat on a bunk to the right of the open door. In the quarters at the time were
State v. Armstrongpublic domain
276 Kan. 819 (2003) 80 P.3d 378 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellant, v. MICHAEL J. ARMSTRONG, Appellee. Nos. 88,692, 88,835, 89,595, 88,899. Supreme Court of Kansas. Opinion filed December 12, 2003. *820 Steven J. Obermeier, assistant district attorney, argued the cause, and Paul J. Morrison, district
K.W. ex rel. D.W. v. Armstrongpublic domain
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER B. LYNN WINMILL, Chief Judge. INTRODUCTION Before the Court are motions filed by Plaintiffs to (1) certify a class, (2) extend the existing preliminary injunction to the class members, and (3) file a consolidated class action complaint. The defendants (collectively referred to as Idaho Department of Health and Welfare or IDHW) have filed a second motion to
Clarke v. Bank of Commercepublic domain
506 F.Supp.2d 851 (2007) Patricia J. CLARKE and Deborah R. Wolfard, Plaintiffs, v. BANK OF COMMERCE, Defendant. No. 06-CV-0232-CVE-SAJ. United States District Court, N.D. Oklahoma. March 30, 2007. *852 *853 *854 David Ray Blades, Armstrong & Lowe PA, Tu
PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge: The state of Texas sued the Interstate Commerce Commission under the Freedom of Information Act to force the ICC to disclose certain documents. The district court ruled that, of the eleven documents withheld by the ICC, six had to be disclosed. We affirmed that ruling. Texas then moved for attorneys fees under 5 U.S. C.A. § 552(a)(4)(E) (W