Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Armando Leyva”
Leyva-Munoz v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Leyva v. Williamspublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
United States v. Leyva-Posadapublic domain
PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Hector Armando Leyva-Posada raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that a prior convic*597tion is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate cri
Leyva v. Williamspublic domain
504 F.3d 357 (2007) Armando LEYVA, Appellant v. Antonio WILLIAMS, Probation Officer; The District Attorney of the County of Philadelphia; The Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania. No. 05-2371. United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. Argued March 12, 2007. Filed: October 3, 2007. *358
Leyva v. Meissnerpublic domain
996 F.Supp. 831 (1998) Armando Naranjo LEYVA, Petitioner, v. Doris MEISSNER, I.N.S. Commissioner, Respondent. No. 97-1234. United States District Court, C.D. Illinois. February 9, 1998. *832 Armando Naranjo Leyva, Pekin, IL, pro se. Thomas A. Keith, Asst. U.S. Attorney, Peoria, IL, for Respondent. ORDER<
Armando Naranjo Leyva v. Janet Reno, United States Attorney General, Kathleen (Nmn) Hawk, Bureau of Prison Directorpublic domain
67 F.3d 312 NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order. Arm
Leyva v. Williamspublic domain
Opinions of the United 2007 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 10-3-2007 Leyva v. Williams Precedential or Non-Preceden
Toro Rivera v. Estado Libre Asociadopublic domain
Opinión disidente emitida por el Juez Asociado Señor Es-trella Martínez, a la cual se une la Jueza Presidenta Señora Fiol Matta. Por considerar que ante los hechos particulares que pre-senta la controversia de epígrafe sencillamente procedía reconocer que nos encontramos ante una excepción al re-quisito de notificación previa para demandar al Estado, disiento de la determinación emitida por una M
United States v. Moyapublic domain
Case: 20-40393 Document: 00516097898 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/17/2021 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED November 17, 2021
Angel Calleros v. Statepublic domain
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS ANGEL CALLEROS, Appellant, V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. § § §
United States v. Jesus Ledezma-Cepedapublic domain
JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge: Jesus Ledezma-Cepeda ("Ledezma") and Jose Cepeda-Cortes ("Cepeda") appeal their convictions of interstate stalking and conspiracy to commit murder for hire. Cepeda appeals his conviction of tampering with documents or proceedings. Cepeda claims the district court abused its discretion in declining to sever his case for trial, and Ledezma objects to eviden
Angel Calleros v. Statepublic domain
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS § ANGEL CALLEROS, No. 08-09-00231-CR § Appellant, Appeal from the § V.
Marmolejo-Campos v. Holderpublic domain
BERZON, Circuit Judge, with whom PREGERSON, FISHER, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges, join, dissenting: I agree with the majority that Chevron U.S.A. Inc., v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837, 104 S.Ct. 2778, 81 L.Ed.2d 694 (1984), is the correct framework within which to evaluate whether deference is due to the BIAs holding, in a precedential decision, that a co
Karen Stromberg v. Qualcomm Inc.public domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT KAREN STROMBERG; SAMUEL No. 19-15159 ROECKER; THOMAS LAMMEL; MARY GALLOWAY; DANIELLE LAGRAVE; D.C. No. THOMAS MCMAHON; BOARDSPORTS 5:17-md-02773- SCHOOL LLC; PATRICK BENAD; LHK LINDSEY CARR; RENEE ACOSTA; PATRICIA BURNESS; CAROL HARRIS; ROBERT LINKS; NICHELLE LYONS; OPINION NUALA VIGNOLES; RACHEL L. MILLER; JOHN WILLIAM KIEFER III; MATTHEW MITCHELL; SUSAN
El Pescador Church, Inc. v. Hector P. Ferrero, Rosa Ferrero, Antonio Nunez, and Diego Sanchezpublic domain
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS EL PESCADOR CHURCH, INC., § § No. 08-18-00029-CV Appellant, § Appeal from th
People v. Lopezpublic domain
Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Warner, J.), entered May 4, 1981, which convicted defendant, after a nonjury trial, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the first degree, criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal use of drug paraphernalia in the second degree, and sentenced him to concurrent terms of imprisonment of four years to life, 4 to 12 years and one year, respectively, unanimously reversed, on the
NUMBER 13-20-00425-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG TEXAS WINDSTORM INSURANCE ASSOCIATION, Appellant, v. COMMERCE OFFICE PARK-ONE, L.P., Appellee. ON APPEAL FROM THE 105TH DISTRICT COURT OF NUECES COUNTY, TEX
Ignacio Llerena, Inc. v. Estado Libre Asociadopublic domain
TEXTO COMPLETO DE LA SENTENCIA Se nos solicita que revoquemos una sentencia del Tribunal de Primera Instancia, Sala Superior de San Juan, dictada el 19 de octubre de 1998 y notificada el día 26 del mismo mes. Mediante la referida sentencia se desestimó la demanda de daños y perjuicios instada contra el Estado Libre Asociado, el Departamento de Transportación y Obras Públicas y la Autoridad de Carreteras y Transportación.
Ramos v. Thornburghpublic domain
761 F.Supp. 1258 (1991) Jorge RAMOS, Aniceto Sancio, Julio Cesar Rodriguez, Miguel Martinez Diaz, Jorge Verrier Urria, Rawou Acosta, Felix Gonzalez Gisbert, Cesar Napoles Carreño, Isidoro Moringo Barro, Nicholas Moreno, Arturo Ojeda, Francisco Catala, Lazaro Rodriguez, Secada Jorrin Maximo, Gonzalez Fidel, Ramon Tajes-Rodriguez, Jorge Luis Jardines, Gonzalez Rolando, Jiminez Masso Ricardo, Sergio Torres Quintaña, Orlando Casana Hernandez, Alberto Quinter
Derek McClellan v. Statepublic domain
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS ) DEREK McCLELLAN, ) No. 08-04-00061-CR ) Appellant, ) Appeal from ) v.