Cases

GORDON McCLOUD, J. *1209 ¶ 1 The United States Supreme Court has tasked us with deciding whether the Washington courts violated the United States Constitution's guaranty of religious neutrality in our prior adjudication of this case. We have fully reviewed the record with this issue in

NUMBERS 13-24-00126-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG KAITLIN ARLENE SANCHEZ, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. ON APPEAL FROM THE 25TH DISTRICT COURT

Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed January 17, 2013. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-12-00828-CV COURTYARD SNF, L.L.C. D/B/A COURTYARD CONVALESCENT CENTER AND MANDY AMANDA NATION, Appellants V. ARLENE SWEET, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF JOSEPH SWEET, SR., AND JOSEPH P. SWEET, JR., MICHAE

January 17, 2013 JUDGMENT The Fourteenth Court of Appeals COURTYARD SNF, L.L.C. D/B/A COURTYARD CONVALESCENT CENTER AND MANDY AMANDA NATION, Appellants NO. 14-12-00828-CV V. ARLENE SWEET, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF JOSEPH SWEET, SR., AND JOSEPH P. SWEET, JR., MICHAEL SWEET, BARBARA HAWKINS, RHONDA BLANTON AND

Motion Granted and Abatement Order filed November 14, 2012 In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________ NO. 14-12-00828-CV ____________ COURTYARD SNF, L.L.C. D/B/A COURTYARD CONVALESCENT CENTER AND MANDY AMANDA NATION, Appellants V. ARLENE SWEET, INDIVIDUALLY AN

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-2083 ARLENE FRY, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. RAND CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION Defendant – Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Anthony John Trenga, District Judge. (1:17-cv-00878-AJ

JUSTICE BRUTINEL, opinion of the Court: ¶ 1 Mertola, LLC, sued Alberto Santos and his wife Arlene Santos (collectively, "Santos") to collect an outstanding credit-card debt. Although the credit-card agreement gave the creditor the option of declaring the debt immediately due and payable upon default, we hold that even if that option was not exercised, the cause of action to collect th

Judge Daniel L. Dysart 11 Defendant-appellant, Glynn . Hawkins, appeals his convictions of second degree murder, discharge of a firearm during a violent crime and obstruction of justice, while defendant-appellant, Alex Lewis, appeals his conviction of second degree murder. In this appeal, Mr. Hawkins and Mr. Lewis both raise* the issue of whether the trial court erroneously allowed evidence of their gang affiliation to be in

[Cite as Howard v. Hawkins, 2017-Ohio-1473.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LUCAS COUNTY Tammy Howard Court of Appeals No. L-16-1087 Appellant Trial Court No. CI0201401633 v. Daniel Hawkins, et al. DECISION AND JUDGMENT Appellees

160 Ill. App.3d 71 (1987) 513 N.E.2d 143 In re MARRIAGE OF PRENTISS HAWKINS, Petitioner-Appellant, and ARLENE HAWKINS, Respondent-Appellee. No. 5-86-0299. Illinois Appellate Court — Fifth District. Opinion filed September 2, 1987. *72 Timothy R. Neubauer and Warren N. Loar IV, both of Musick & Mitchell, of Mt.

Opinion Per Cueiam, The order of the Superior Court is affirmed by an evenly divided Court insofar as it affirms the judgments of sentence of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County at Nos. 427, 431, and 433 February Term, 1971. The order of the Superior Court is unanimously reversed insofar as it affirms the judgments of sentence *32

367 F.Supp. 1025 (1973) Perry HAWKINS v. Carl ROBINSON, Warden, Connecticut Correctional Institution. Civ. No. 15700. United States District Court, D. Connecticut. November 21, 1973. *1026 John L. Hayes, Hartford, Conn., for plaintiff. Arlen Nickowitz, Asst. State's Atty., Bridgeport, Conn., for defendant.

510 P.2d 693 (1973) Samuel C. HAWKINS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee. No. A-17920. Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma. May 21, 1973. Philip F. Horning, Arlene Tucker, Oklahoma City, for appellant. Larry Derryberry, Atty. Gen., Fred H. Anderson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Kenneth L. Delashaw, Jr., Legal Intern, for appellee.

162 Conn. 514 (1972) STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. PERRY M. HAWKINS, JR. Supreme Court of Connecticut. Argued December 8, 1971. Decided March 22, 1972. HOUSE, C. J., THIM, RYAN, SHAPIRO and LOISELLE, JS. Howard T. Owens, Jr., special public defender, for the appellant (defendant). Arlen D. Nickowitz, assistant state's attorney, with whom, on th

Judgment of sentence affirmed. Spaulding, J., absent.

448 Pa. 206 (1972) Commonwealth v. Hawkins, Appellant. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Argued January 11, 1972. June 28, 1972. *207 Before JONES, C.J., EAGEN, O'BRIEN, ROBERTS, POMEROY, NIX and MANDERINO, JJ. *208 James B. Crummett, with him Oscar N. Gaskins, for appellant.

Dissenting Opinion by Packel, J.: The record of this case is replete with evidence of serious misconduct by the defendant-appellant. Time and again he made promises which he did not fulfill. Excuses for nonperformance poured from his lips in a steady stream. Misstatements seemed to be the order of the day. There is no doubt as to the suffering of many of the customers of the defendant as a result of the manner

This is a petition for a writ of habeas corpus alleging unlawful imprisonment. The plaintiff was found guilty, after a jury trial in the Superior *Page 465 Court, Fairfield County, on a charge of violation of the Dependency-Producing Drugs Act — Public Acts 1967, No. 555 §§ 8, 36(a); General Statutes §§ 19-452, 19-480 (a) — and sentenced on March 14, 1969, to a term of not less than seven nor more than ten years in state pr

Reversed and Rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed March 11, 2014. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-13-00695-CV CITY OF DEER PARK, Appellant V. LEONARD JAMES HAWKINS, Appellee On Appeal from the 334th District Court Harris County, Texas

Order affirmed.