Cases

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA IN THE MATTER OF A MEMBER OF THE STATE BAR OF ARIZONA, APRIL ARLENE SPONSEL, ATTORNEY N O. 23009, Respondent. No. SB-24-0007-AP Filed April 11, 2025 Appeal of Hearing Panel Opinion and Disciplinary Order fr

*522 Opinion RAMIREZ, P. J. — Joseph H., the minor, at age 10, woke up early one morning and shot his father in the head as the latter slept on the sofa. A wardship petition was filed alleging the minor had committed acts which would have been crimes if committed by an adult, specific

SNEED, Circuit Judge: The Sacramento Unified School District (“the District”) timely appeals the district court’s judgment in favor of Rachel Holland (“Rachel”) and the California State Department of Education. The court found that the appropriate placement for Rachel under the Individuals with Disabilities Act (“IDEA”) was full-time in a regular second grade classroom with some supplemental services. The District contends

Grosse, J. As a general rule policy statements in an ordinance or statute do not give rise to enforceable rights and duties. However, where legislation, despite being couched in words of policy, creates a mandatory duty but leaves to the discretion of an agency the specifics of implementation, the general rule is not always applicable. The question becomes one of the propriety of the discretion exercised by the agency. But where

ACCELERATED DOCKET ORDER ¶ 1 Appellant was fifteen years old when he was charged as a juvenile delinquent with Attempted Rape By Instrumentation, Assault, and two counts of Intimidation of a Witness, in the District Court of Nowata County, Case No. JF-2005-5.1 He was adjudicated delinquent after a non-jury trial held on March 3, 2005 and placed in the custody of his father pending a disposition hear

[Cite as CadleRock Joint Venture, L.P. v. Burnley, 2016-Ohio-147.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT HURON COUNTY Cadlerock Joint Venture, L.P. Court of Appeals No. H-15-001 Appellee Trial Court No. CVH 2013 0914 v. Clifford Burnley DECISION AND JUDG

Matter of CLSA Ams., LLC v Mayo (2025 NY Slip Op 03128) Matter of CLSA Ams., LLC v Mayo 2025 NY Slip Op 03128 Decided on May 22, 2025 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciar

POOLE, Circuit Judge: The Arizona Public Service Company (APS), a utility company that supplies power to most of Arizona, and several of its wholesale customers, appeal from two rate-making decisions of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). APS had proposed a rate increase that the wholesale customers opposed. APS and the wholesale customers now challenge various aspects of the FERC’s resolution of the rate-maki

167 P.3d 135 (2007) David W. STEEDLE, M.D.; Neil Waldman, M.D.; City and County of Denver; and Denver General Hospital, n/k/a Denver Health Medical Center, Petitioners v. Bradley Scott SEREFF, individually and as personal representative of the Estate of Jennifer Sereff; Elliott Sereff, through his guardian, father, and next friend, Bradley Scott Sereff; and Skylar Sereff, through her guardian, father, and next friend, Bradley Scott Sereff, Respon

14 F.3d 1398 89 Ed. Law Rep. 57, 4 A.D.D. 75 SACRAMENTO CITY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, BOARD OF EDUCATION,Plaintiff-Appellant,v.RACHEL H., By and Through her guardian ad litem, RobertHOLLAND; William Honig, California State Superintendent ofPublic Instruction; California State Department ofEducation Hearing Office, McGeorge School of Law; and MaryCote, Hearing Officer, Defendants-Appellees.

IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2026 ND 25 Jonathan T. Garaas and David Garaas, as Co-Trustees of the Barbara Susan Garaas Family Trust; Jonathan T. Garaas, as Trustee of the David and Elizabeth Garaas Family Trust; and David Garaas, as Trustee of the Jonathan & Jill Garaas Family Trust, Appellants v. North Dakota Industrial Commission; and Petro-Hunt L.L.C., a limited liabi

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT IN THE MATTER OF: OPENING A : No. 444 WAL 2014 PRIVATE ROAD FOR THE BENEFIT OF : TIMOTHY P. O'REILLY OVER LANDS : OF (A) HICKORY ON THE GREEN : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, AND : Order of the Commonwealth Court (B) MARY LOU SORBARA; GREGORY : E. BURGUNDER; ANN E. CAIN; DON E. : COTTRILL & NORMA J. COTTRILL, : H/W; JOSEP

569 F.Supp. 1324 (1983) DAVID H., Through his parents and next friends John and Arlene H. v. SPRING BRANCH INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al. C.A. No. H-80-2739. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. August 5, 1983. *1325 *1326 Sarah Scott, Brooklyn, N.Y., for plaintiffs

Reversed in Part and Remanded and Opinion filed March 27, 2003 Reversed in Part and Remanded and Opinion filed March 27, 2003.

SNEED, Circuit Judge, concurring separately: I concur in Judge Poole’s opinion. Confronted with some uncertainties about scientific truth, judges, perhaps above all others, should act on the basis of that which is known, or, where this is not possible, on the basis of that which those best qualified to speak say is known. Judge Poole has set out clearly what those best qualified say they k

55 F.3d 956 19 Employee Benefits Cas. 1577 Norman W. SWANSON; William H. Talbert; Robert B. Campbell;Billy Clark; Charles A. Dancy; Wallace M. Davis; WilliamE. Denton; Galena Elworth; Melvin F. Eyerman; Hamilton M.Howe; Ralph P. Hunt; Henry F. Murray; William E.Nicholson, III; Robert A. Nisbet; John L. Powell, Jr.;Donald V. Wallace; Mary L. Pritchard; Carl L. Whitney;Ira N. Schwarz

CALABRESI, Circuit Judge: Martin Tankleff was convicted in New York state court for the murder of his parents, Seymour and Arlene Tankleff. On February 7, 1996, he filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Thomas C. Platt, Judge) denied Tankleff s petition on January 30, 1997.

ORDER The order of the district court denying appellant Vincent L. Chalk’s motion for a preliminary injunction is reversed. On this record, appellant has shown a strong likelihood of prevailing on the merits of his case. Evidence before the district court overwhelmingly indicates that the casual contact incident to the performance of his teaching duties in the classroom presents no significant risk of harm to ot

115 F.3d 860 74 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 281,71 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 44,804,11 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 61Arlene REYNOLDS, Plaintiff-Appellee, Cross-Appellant,v.CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., A Virginia Corporation,Defendant-Appellant, Cross-Appellee,Roger Widney, A Supervisory Employee of CSX Transportation,Inc., Defendant. No. 95-3364. United States Court of Appeals,Ele

971 A.2d 486 (2009) In the Matter of Opening a Private Road for the Benefit of Timothy P. O'REILLY Over Lands of (A) Hickory On The Green Homeowners Association, and (B) Mary Lou Sorbara; Gregory E. Burgunder; Ann E. Cain; Don E. Cottrill & Norma J. Cottrill, h/w; Joseph K. Cupples; Bart V. Delcimmuto; James D. Dragoo & Linda J. Dragoo, h/w; Kimberly M. Fonzi; Brian J. Gallagher & Diane J. Gallagher, h/w; Dolores M. Gembarosky; Michael J. Gra