Cases

Appellate Case: 24-3141 Document: 72-1 Date Filed: 09/02/2025 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS September 2, 2025

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 23-1839 UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. IAN FREEMAN, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE [Hon. Joseph N. Laplante, U.S. District Judge] Before

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 23-1159 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. RANDALL CRATER, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. Denise J. Casper, U.S. District Judge] B

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 602 U. S. Part 1 Pages 680–778 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 21, 2024 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 22-50048 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:20-cr- 00387-AB-1 v. STEVEN DUARTE, AKA Shorty, OPINION Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California André Birotte

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ____________ No. 23-2335 ____________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CORRIGAN CLAY, Appellant ____________ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsy

USCA4 Appeal: 22-4736 Doc: 105 Filed: 09/03/2024 Pg: 1 of 50 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 22-4735 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. IZZAT FREITEKH, Defendant - Ap

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT STATE OF CALIFORNIA, by No. 19-15974 and through Attorney General Xavier Becerra, D.C. No. Plaintiff-Appellee, 3:19-cv-01184-EMC v. ALEX M. AZAR II, in his Official Capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, Defendants-Appellants. 2 STATE OF CA

HESS, J., OPINION and ORDER Before the court are the preliminary objections and petition to compel arbitration of defendants McCann Education Centers, Inc.1 (hereinafter “McCann”) and Delta Career Education Corporation (hereinafter “Delta”) filed in response to an amended complaint filed by plaintiff Kelsi Weidner. (Prelim, objections and pet. to compel indv. arbitration

Plaintiffs contend the Final Rule is in excess of the agency's statutory authority, is arbitrary and capricious, violates the Administrative Procedures Act, violates Title X requirements, violates congressional Non-directive Mandates, violates Section 1554 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act ("ACA"), and is otherwise unconstitutional. Plaintiffs assert the Final Rule is not designed to further the purposes of Title X, which is

PER CURIAM: *1073BACKGROUND In 1970, Congress enacted Title X of the Public Health Service Act ("Title X") to create a limited grant program for certain types of pre-pregnancy family planning services. See Pub. L. No. 91-572,

Opinion by Judge Blatt, Before us are consolidated appeals emanating from the same factual background, but involving different *540procedural routes. Michael J. Botti (Botti) appeals an order of the Secretary of Education (Secretary) which determined, after argument but without holding an evidentiary hearing, that Botti, who had been employed as a teache

666 F.Supp. 370 (1987) LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. Mario M. CUOMO, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of New York, Paul L. Gioia, in his official capacity as Chairman of the New York Public Service Commission, Harold A. Jerry, Jr., Anne F. Mead, Gail Garfield Schwartz and John Doe, in their official capacities as Commissioners of the New York Public Service Commission, the Long Island Power Authority, and William L.