Cases

NO. 5-98-0016 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIFTH DISTRICT _____________________________________________________________________________________________ BELLEVILLE TOYOTA, INC., ) Appeal from the ) Circuit Court of Plaintiff-Appel

738 N.E.2d 938 (2000) 316 Ill.App.3d 227 250 Ill.Dec. 469 BELLEVILLE TOYOTA, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, U.S.A., INC., and Toyota Motor Distributors, Inc., Defendants-Appellants. No. 5-98-0016. Appellate Court of Illinois, Fifth District. August 30, 2000. *940 T

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Judges Beales, Friedman and Callins PUBLISHED Argued at Leesburg, Virginia PEGASYSTEMS INC. OPINION BY v. Record No. 1399-22-4 JUDGE FRANK K. FRIEDMAN JULY 30, 2024

****************************************************** The ‘‘officially released’’ date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the ‘‘officially released’’ date appearing in the opinion. In no event will any such motions be accepted before the ‘‘o

OPINION BY DONOHUE, J.: ¶ 1 Appellant Tara Gaudio (“Gaudio”), both individually and as the administratrix of the estate of Andrew M. Gaudio (the “Deceased”), appeals from the trial court’s order dated April 4, 2007 entering judgment in favor of Appellee Ford Motor Company (“Ford”) after a jury trial that resulted in a verdict in Ford’s favor. Gau-dio appeals various evidentiary rulings made by the trial court

379 F.Supp.2d 857 (2005) FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. Kasey KAHNE, Defendant. No. 04-CV-72525-DT. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. August 1, 2005. *858 *859 Emily M. Robinson, Khalilah V. Spencer, Dickinson Wright, Detroit, MI, Maurice G. Jenkins, Dickinson

704 F.2d 125 1983-1 Trade Cases 65,291 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA on its own behalf and as ParensPatriae, Appellee,v.MID-ATLANTIC TOYOTA DISTRIBUTORS, INC., CarecraftIndustries, Ltd., Frederick R. Weisman, and Al Sweet MotorSales, Inc., Allegheny Toyota, Inc., Bel Air Motors, Inc.,Bergman Toyota, Inc., Bob Mayberry Chevrolet-Toyota, Inc.,Bud Haas Toyota Motors, Inc., Falconi Toyota Motors

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER MacLAUGHLIN, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment. The Court will grant that motion. FACTS Defendant Arena Auto Auction Inc. (Arena) is a Chicago-based automobile wholesaler incorporated in Delaware. Arena conducts auctions of automobiles for dealers, but it does not own the vehicles. Rather

529 U.S. 861 (2000) GEIER et al. v. AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC., ET AL. No. 98-1811. United States Supreme Court. Argued December 7, 1999. Decided May 22, 2000. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT *862 *863 Breyer, J., d

JAMES DICKSON PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge: This interlocutory appeal has been certified, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b), on the question whether the state attorneys general of Maryland, Delaware, and Pennsylvania, and the Corporation Counsel of the District of Columbia, may maintain statutory parens patriae damage actions under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, 15 U.S.C. §§ 15c-15h (1976) (the Act

ACCEPTED 04-15-00118-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEAL

MEMORANDUM ** Naren Chaganti (“Chaganti”) appeals the dismissal of his suit against Paul Arena and i2 Phone International, Inc.-(collectively, the “Defendants”) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, contending the district court misapplied California state law in concluding that he failed to state allegations sufficient to meet 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)’s $75,000 amount-in-controversy requirement. Reciting the

MEMORANDUM ** Naren Chaganti (“Chaganti”) appeals the dismissal of his suit against Paul Arena and i2 Phone International, Inc.-(collectively, the “Defendants”) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, contending the district court misapplied California state law in concluding that he failed to state allegations sufficient to meet 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)’s $75,000 amount-in-controversy requirement. Reciting the

FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit November 21, 2016 PUBLISH Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court

384 F.Supp.2d 515 (2005) Elbia E. ARCE-MONTALVO, Plaintiff v. HOSPITAL BUEN SAMARITANO, INC., Defendant. No. 04-1375 (SEC)(JA). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. July 8, 2005. *516 Carlos E. Vega-Perez, Vega Perez Law Office, Arecibo, PR, for Plaintiff. Frances R. Colon-Rivera, Saldana & Carvajal, San Juan,

OPINION OF THE COURT Spain, J. After executing promissory notes and obtaining student loans in 1972 and 1974 which were guaranteed by plaintiffs predecessor, defendant allegedly defaulted and plaintiff honored its guaranty and paid the bank the entire loan balance of $9,355 (see Education Law § 680 [1] [b]). In 1983, plaintiff obtained a default judgment against defendant in the amount of $9,664.6

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT KIMBERLY MARROQUIN, No. 23-55423 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:21-cv-07607- v. RGK-JEM CITY OF LOS ANGELES; DIMAGGIO RICO, Officer, # 43442, OPINION Defendants-Appellants, and UNIDENTIFIED LAPD OFFICER; RICHARD PAUL STABILE, Captain; MATTHEW CLYMER, Officer, # 35204; A

ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO STRIKE DOLLY M. GEE, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Gilbert J. Arenas, Jr.’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Defendant Shed Media U.S. Inc.’s Motion to Strike. A hearing was held on August 22, 2011. Having duly considered the respective positions of the parties, as presented in their bri

BEAR, J. In these consolidated appeals, 1 a principal issue in each of the cases is the meaning and application of the phrase "not more than thirty days" set forth in General Statutes § 14-60 (a). 2 The trial court, in render

Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to the Illinois Official Reports accuracy and integrity of this