⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Archway Homes, Inc.”

Mississippi Supreme Court · 1996-05-30 · Published · cited 0× · 675 So. 2d 316; 1996 Miss. LEXIS 344; 1996 WL 343915
Appeal No. 12923876 from Judgment dated April 8,1993, Richard Wayne McKenzie, Ruling Judge, Forrest County Circuit Court. Before SULLIVAN, P.J., and McRAE and MILLS, JJ. Affirmed.
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2010-10-29 · Published · cited 21× · 291 P.3d 628; 2012 OK CIV APP 87; 2010 Okla. Civ. App. LEXIS 162; 2010 WL 8972195
CAROL M. HANSEN, Judge. {1 In May 2006, Defendant, Broadway Homes1 [Broadway], a manufactured home *631dealer, ordered a manufactured home [home] from Sunshine Homes, Inc., [Sunshine], a manufacturer of manufactured homes. Sunshine transported the home in two halves, half A and half B. During the transport from Sunshine in Alabama to Broad
District Court, N.D. Florida · 2015-03-31 · Published · cited 0× · 101 F. Supp. 3d 1201; 114 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1512; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41837; 2015 WL 1482301
ORDER M. CASEY RODGERS, Chief Judge. Plaintiff Home Design Services, Inc. (“Home Design”) filed this suit against Defendants for copyright infringement of an architectural home design titled “HDS-2089,” claiming that Defendants built 165 infringing homes as part of their “Lau*1205rent” and “Dakota” designs based on slightly modified
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016-06-17 · Published · cited 20× · 825 F.3d 1314; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 10962; 2016 WL 3361479
GOLDBERG, Judge: Plaintiff Home Design Services, Inc. (“Home Design”) has sued Defendants *1316Turner Heritage Homes, Inc., et al. (“Turner”) for copyright infringement on Home Design’s architectural floor plan HDS-2089. According to Home Design, two of Turner’s floor plans, the Laurent and the Dakota, infringe on HDS-2089. Home Design’s lawsuit went to trial befor
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016-06-17 · Published · cited 0×
Case: 15-11912 Date Filed: 06/17/2016 Page: 1 of 43 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 15-11912 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 4:08-cv-00355-MCR-
Missouri Court of Appeals · 1996-06-18 · Published · cited 1× · 926 S.W.2d 476; 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1065; 1996 WL 330886
SIMON, Judge. Mike and Madalyn Berga, plaintiffs, appeal the granting of a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim in favor of Archway Kitchen and Bath, Inc. (Archway), in an action for the wrongful death of their son, Mark, pursuant to § 537.080 RSMo. Supp.1992 (all further references shall be to RSMo. Supp.1992 unless otherwise noted). Plaintiffs contend the trial court erred in granting Archway’
Missouri Court of Appeals · 1992-07-14 · Published · cited 0× · 838 S.W.2d 13; 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1161; 1992 WL 159539
PUDLOWSKI, Presiding Judge. Plaintiff, Archway Kitchen & Bath (Archway) filed a two count petition to recover for labor and materials furnished at the residence of defendant Robert and Denise Meyer (Meyers) pursuant to an agreement between Archway and defendant Lands Development Corp. (Lands). Count I is predicated on a breach of contract theory. Count II seeks recovery in quantum meruit. At the close of the evidence in th
Court of Appeals of Washington · 1978-10-16 · Published · cited 7× · 586 P.2d 502; 21 Wash. App. 555; 1978 Wash. App. LEXIS 1959
21 Wn. App. 555 (1978) 586 P.2d 502 EUGENE N. KINISKI, ET AL, Appellants, v. ARCHWAY MOTEL, INC., ET AL, Respondents. No. 5163-1. The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One. October 16, 1978. *556 Sam Peach, for appellants. Sherwood, Bentley & Anderson, Robert Sherwood, Ernest Be
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1977-10-20 · Published · cited 13× · 378 A.2d 720; 37 Md. App. 674; 1977 Md. App. LEXIS 341
37 Md. App. 674 (1977) 378 A.2d 720 ARCHWAY MOTORS, INC. v. WALTER F. HERMAN. No. 415, September Term, 1977. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. Decided October 20, 1977. *675 The cause was argued before MORTON, MELVIN and WILNER, JJ. Charles F. Obrecht, Jr., for appellant. Willia
Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1984-10-16 · Published · cited 33× · 690 P.2d 158; 142 Ariz. 439; 1984 Ariz. App. LEXIS 496
142 Ariz. 439 (1984) 690 P.2d 158 Robert NASTRI and Barbara Nastri, husband and wife, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. WOOD BROS. HOMES, INC., an Arizona corporation, Defendant/Appellee. No. 2 CA-CIV 5035. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2. October 16, 1984. Dennis A. Rosen, Tucson, for plaintiffs/appellants. Stinson & Douglas, P.A.
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2019-04-17 · Published · cited 1× · 601 B.R. 261
Mary F. Walrath, United States Bankruptcy Judge *264Before the Court is a matter remanded from the District Court on the appeal of this Court's decision dated November 26, 2012, dismissing the chapter 7 trustee's complaint to avoid and recover preferential transfers of $ 5,444,541.11 against Avnet, Inc. ("Avnet"). In the November 26 decision, this Court held that the Tr
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2025-08-07 · Published · cited 1× · 2025 Ohio 2784
[Cite as Whitney Woods Homeowners' Assn., Inc. v. Steagall, 2025-Ohio-2784.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT Whitney Woods Homeowners’ : Association, Inc., : Plaintiff-Appellee/ No. 24AP-583 Cross-Appellant, : (C.P.C. No. 22
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2018-03-28 · Published · cited 0× · 2018 IL App (3d) 160554; 102 N.E.3d 834
JUSTICE SCHMIDT delivered the judgment of the court, with opinion. ¶ 1 The Estate of Richard A. Demith (Estate) appeals the trial court's orders granting summary judgment to Carpentry by Connor Construction, Inc. (Connor), and E Trinity Construction, LLC (E Trinity), on their respective complaints to foreclose their mechanic's liens. We affirm. ¶ 2 FACTS
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016-12-20 · Published · cited 36× · 795 S.E.2d 253; 251 N.C. App. 27; 2016 N.C. App. LEXIS 1325; 2016 WL 7367996
ENOCHS, Judge. *28 Christine Bodden a/k/a Christine Dryfus ("Defendant") appeals from the trial court's judgment against her, and the trial court's order awarding costs to Bradley Woodcraft, Inc. ("Plaintiff"). On appeal, she contends that the trial court erred in (1) entering a directed verdic
Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2020-02-12 · Published · cited 4× · 2020 Ark. App. 105
Cite as 2020 Ark. App. 105 Reason: I attest to the accuracy ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS and integrity of this document Date: 2021-06-30 11:40:44 Foxit PhantomPDF Version: DIVISION IV 9.7.5 No. CV-18-198 Opinion Delivered February 12, 2020
United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2004-02-13 · Published · cited 0× · 305 F. Supp. 2d 1359; 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2191
*1360 ORDER DENYING TRANSFER WM. TERRELL HODGES, Chairman. This litigation consists of three actions pending in the District of Nebraska and one action pending in the District of Utah. It arises out of an August 2000 highway accident involving a bus owned by Greyhound Lines, Inc. (Greyhound) and a truck owned by Archway Cookies, LLC (Ar
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2022-07-07 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 20-3663 ___________________________ John S. Hahn, Special Master Bader Farms, Inc. Plaintiff - Appellee Bill Bader
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016-06-10 · Published · cited 3× · 826 F.3d 388; 75 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 1528; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 10569; 62 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 196; 2016 WL 3213096
SYKES, Circuit Judge. During the 90-day preference period preceding its Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing, Sparrer Sausage Company paid invoices it received from Jason’s Foods, Inc., one of its suppliers, totaling roughly $587,000. The Unsecured Creditors Committee asked that these payments be returned to the bankruptcy estate as avoidable preferences under § 547(b) of the Bankrupt
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2014-12-18 · Published · cited 2× · 522 B.R. 480; 72 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 1228; 2014 Bankr. LEXIS 5075; 60 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 112
Chapter 7 OPINION1 Sontchi, J. INTRODUCTION Before the Court is a motion for summary judgment filed by the defendant in a preference action seeking to recover transfers, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. sections 547 and 550. Defendant seeks summary judgment determining that the preferential transfers, if any, are not avoidable because they (
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022-06-14 · Published · cited 0×
USCA4 Appeal: 20-1023 Doc: 75 Filed: 08/09/2021 Pg: 1 of 55 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-1001 BONNIE PELTIER, as Guardian of A.P., a minor child; ERIKA BOOTH, as Guardian of I.B., a minor child; KEELY BURKS, P