Cases

ACCEPTED 14-15-00925-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 12/22/2015 2:55:16

ACCEPTED 03-15-00416-CV 7113395 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ FOX FACTORY, INC., Appellant v. SRAM, LLC, Appellee ______________________ 2018-2024, 2018-2025 ______________________ Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2017- 00118,

OPINION Opinion by Justice FILLMORE. Appellants Lloyd Ward, Lloyd Ward, P.C, Lloyd Ward & Associates, and Lloyd Ward Group, P.C. appeal the denial of their motion to vacate a Kansas default judgment in favor of appellee Kelly Hawkins. In three issues, appellants contend the trial court (1) abused its discretion by not granting their

Patent Infringement; 28 U.S.C. § 1498; Claim Construction; Ordinary and Customary Meaning; Prosecution History Disclaimer. CLAIM CONSTRUCTION OPINION AND ORDER WILLIAMS, Judge. In this action, Plaintiff, Ross-Hime Designs, Inc. (“Ross-Hime”), claims that the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (“NASA”) infringed two pat

PHILIP P. SIMON, JUDGE This is a products liability case where Barbara Kaiser claimed to have been substantially and permanently injured by a mesh product that was implanted in her vagina to treat her pelvic organ prolapse. The mesh product was designed and manufactured by defendants Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc. After a two week trial, the jury agreed with Mrs. Kaiser and found in her favor on her failure to warn and desi

OPINION WEIS, Circuit Judge. In this appeal we conclude that the text of a retention of liabilities provision in a stock purchase agreement requires assumption of CERCLA responsibilities by the seller, rather than simply indemnification. We also decide that prejudgment interest and the cost of an experimental treatment process are reasonable in a contribution suit under CERCLA section 113. 42 U.S.

MEMORANDUM OPINION STARK, U.S. District Judge: Pending before the Court are Defendants Alberee Products, Inc. (“Alberee”), API Korea Co., Ltd. (“API”), and Saver Automotive Products, Inc.’s (“Saver”) (collectively, “Defendants”) motions to dismiss Robert Bosch LLC’s (“Bosch” or “Plaintiff’) patent infringement claims, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2) (D.I. 45, 46), as well a

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ROY S. PAYNE, United States Magistrate Judge Before the Court is the opening claim construction brief of Hitachi Maxell, Ltd. (“Plaintiff’) (Dkt. No. 53, filed on August 26, 2015),1 the response of Top Victory Electronics (Taiwan) Co. Ltd., TPV International (USA), Inc., Envision Peripherals, Inc., Top Victory Electronics (Fujian) Co. Ltd.,

MEMORANDUM Padova, Judge. Five individual Plaintiffs have initiated separate actions against Bayer Corp., Bayer Healthcare LLC, Bayer Essure, Inc., Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals and Bayer A.G. (collectively, “Bayer”). Each action asserts twelve. claims for relief, seeking compensation for injuries that the Plaintiff suffered in connection with her use of Bayer’s female birth control device known as “Essur

OPINION AND ORDER MARK S. DAVIS, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on CertusView Technologies, LLC’s (“Plaintiff’) Rule 72 objections, ECF No. 256, to the magistrate judge’s January 16, 2015 Order granting S & N Communications, Inc., and S & N Locating Services, LLC, (collectively “Defendants” or “S & N”) leave to amend their answer and counterclaims,

507 F.Supp.2d 986 (2007) Steven W. SABASTA and Sioux Falls Insulation Supply, Inc., a South Dakota corporation, d/b/a Sioux City Insulation & Supply, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. BUCKAROOS, INC., Defendant. No. 4:06-cv-180. United States District Court, S.D. Iowa, Central Division. August 31, 2007. *987 Charles Johnson Meyer, Woodard

629 F.Supp.2d 397 (2009) The DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. NOVA CHEMICALS CORPORATION (CANADA), and Nova Chemicals Inc. (Delaware), Defendants. Civil Action No. 05-737-JJF. United States District Court, D. Delaware. June 25, 2009. *398 Harry J. Roper, Esquire; Aaron A. Barlow, Esquire; Raymond N. Nimrod, Esquire and Darrick

726 F.Supp.2d 604 (2010) MICROAIRE SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS, LLC, Plaintiff, v. ARTHREX, INC., Defendant. Case No. 3:09-cv-00078. United States District Court, W.D. Virginia, Charlottesville Division. June 3, 2010. *610 Michael Edward Whitham, Philana Shell Handler, Robert Neal Cook, Whitham, Curtis & Christofferson & Cook, P

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER MILLER, District Judge. This cause is before the court on the motions of defendant Weber Marking Systems, Inc. (‘Weber”) for partial summary judgment on the issue of literal noninfringement, for oral argument, to amend its reply brief in support of its motion for partial summary judgment, and to strike portions of the plaintiffs reply brief. Also before the court is the motio

751 F.Supp.2d 348 (2010) ADVANCED FIBER TECHNOLOGIES TRUST, Plaintiff, v. J & L FIBER SERVICES, INC., Defendant. No. 1:07-CV-1191 (LEK/DRH). United States District Court, N.D. New York. September 13, 2010. Opinion Granting Reconsideration in Part January 12, 2011. *352 Nicholas Mesiti, Shanna K. O'Brien, Alan

AMENDED MEMORANDUM AND ORDER J. PAUL OETKEN, District Judge: This copyright case, involving a film and three screenplays, presents questions about the protection of historical fiction under American intellectual property law. Eve Pomerance owns a copyright in two screenplays about the dramatic and inter7 twined lives of John Ruskin, John Everett Millais, and Euphemia (“Effie”) Gray — two

623 F.Supp.2d 1144 (2009) DELANO FARMS COMPANY, Four Star Fruit, Inc., and Gerawan Farming, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. The CALIFORNIA TABLE GRAPE COMMISSION, Defendant. No. 1:07-cv-1610 OWW SMS. United States District Court, E.D. California. February 20, 2009. *1148 Brian C. Leighton, Law Offices of Brian C. Leighton, Clovis, CA, Lawre

(2008) THERASENSE, INC., Plaintiff, v. BECTON, DICKINSON AND COMPANY, Defendant. Nos. C04-02123 MJJ, C04-03327 MJJ, C04-03732 MJJ, C05-03117 MJJ. United States District Court, N.D. California. April 3, 2008. ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS' NONINFRINGEMENT AND INVALIDITY SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONS MARTIN J. JENKINS, District Judge. INTRODUCTION</

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1019 JOYCE MCKIVER; DELOIS LEWIS; DAPHNE MCKOY; ALEXANDRIA MCKOY; ANTONIO KEVIN MCKOY; ARCHIE WRIGHT, JR.; TAMMY LLOYD; DEBORAH JOHNSON; ETHEL DAVIS; PRISCILLA DUNHAM, Plaintiffs - Appellees, and DENNIS MCKIVER, JR.; LAJUNE JESSUP; DON LLOY