⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “April L. Luck”

Court of Appeals of Iowa · 2018-08-01 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 17-1464 Filed August 1, 2018 AMANDA L. LUCK, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. MICHAEL F. SALMON, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Joel D. Novak, Judge. A father appeals from a district court order granting the mother physical care of their child rathe
Klayman v. Luckpublic domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2012-07-26 · Published · cited 7× · 2012 Ohio 3354
[Cite as Klayman v. Luck, 2012-Ohio-3354.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION Nos. 97074 and 97075 LARRY ELLIOT KLAYMAN PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT vs.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018-04-11 · Published · cited 8× · 887 F.3d 1106
Wallach, Circuit Judge. This appeal concerns the proper classification of certain in-shell sunflower seeds for snacking imported by Appellant Well Luck Company, Inc. ("Well Luck"). U.S. *1109 Customs and Border Protection ("Customs") classified the subject merchandis
United States Court of International Trade · 2017-02-15 · Published · cited 0× · 2017 CIT 16; 208 F. Supp. 3d 1364; 38 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 2342; 2017 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 15; 2017 WL 635496
OPINION Kelly, Judge: This matter is before the court on cross-motions for summary judgment regarding the proper classification of Plaintiffs entry of roasted, salted, and/or flavored whole sunflower seeds in their shells. 1 See Def.’s Mot. Summ. J., Sept. 1, 2016, ECF No. 29; PL’s Cross Mot.
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2012-10-04 · Published · cited 19× · 901 F. Supp. 2d 547; 2012 WL 4747475; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 143761
MEMORANDUM JAMES M. MUNLEY, District Judge. Before the court for disposition are the defendants’ motions to dismiss the complaint (Docs. 14, 15) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). The motions have been fully briefed and are ripe for disposition. Background On May 2, 2011, Plaintiffs Peter Luck and Kenneth Wynder (collectively “plaintiffs”
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010-07-02 · Published · cited 100× · 611 F.3d 183; 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 13609; 2010 WL 2635812
611 F.3d 183 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carlton N. LUCK, a/k/a C-4, Defendant-Appellant. No. 09-6641. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Argued: May 11, 2010. Decided: July 2, 2010. *184 ARGUED: Gregory Mokodean, University of Virginia School of Law, Appellate Litigation
District Court, E.D. New York · 2014-11-17 · Published · cited 0× · 60 F. Supp. 3d 365; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 160853; 2014 WL 6390310
MEMORANDUM & ORDER SEYBERT, District Judge: Currently pending before the Court are: (1) defendant Crystal Cove Seafood Corp.’s (“Defendant”) motion to dismiss the Complaint; and (2) plaintiff Good Luck Product Co. Ltd.’s (“Plaintiff’) cross-motion to amend the Complaint. For the following reasons, both motions are GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. BACKGROUND1</
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017-01-25 · Published · cited 0× · 208 So. 3d 1241; 91 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 859; 2017 WL 361944; 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 718
SHEPHERD, Senior Judge. Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaría (BBVA) appeals a final judgment in favor of Easy Luck Co., Inc., on BBVA’s action against Easy Luck to recoup the sum of $85,000, mistakenly paid by BBVA at its office in the Dominican Republic by draft on an account of a customer there and credited to Easy Luck’s account at Sun-Trust Bank in Miami-Dade County. Applying s
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2026-02-18 · Published · cited 0× · 2026 NY Slip Op 00921
S. Garson, LLC v Luck (2026 NY Slip Op 00921) S. Garson, LLC v Luck 2026 NY Slip Op 00921 Decided on February 18, 2026 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is
District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2009-06-05 · Published · cited 0× · 624 F. Supp. 2d 868; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47249; 106 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1055; 2009 WL 1579718
624 F.Supp.2d 868 (2009) Edward ELLSWORTH, Plaintiff, v. POT LUCK ENTERPRISES, INC., d/b/a Ashley Furniture Homestores, Defendant. Case No. 3:08-cv-0647. United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division. June 5, 2009. *871 Mary Ann Parker, Stephen C. Crofford, Parker & Crofford, Nashville, TN, for Plaintiff.</
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2024-08-26 · Published · cited 0×
FILED Aug 26 2024, 9:03 am CLERK Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals
District Court, District of Columbia · 2021-08-31 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ANDREA ANDERSON, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 21-1140 (JEB) WASHINGTON HILTON, LLC, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Pro se Plaintiff Andrea Anderson has sued Hilton Management LLC (improperly labeled Washington Hilton, LLC) and certain of its employe
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2022-09-26 · Published · cited 8× · 50 F.4th 23
USCA11 Case: 21-12024 Date Filed: 09/26/2022 Page: 1 of 18 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-12024 ____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MICHAEL L. MEYER,
Ohio Supreme Court · 2025-08-13 · Published · cited 8× · 2025 Ohio 2806
[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as Rover Pipeline, L.L.C. v. Harris, Slip Opinion No. 2025-Ohio-2806.] NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any typog
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2023-04-06 · Published · cited 0× · 2023 Ohio 1139
[Cite as Subel v. AMD Plastics, L.L.C., 2023-Ohio-1139.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JACK M. SUBEL, ADMINISTRATOR, ET AL., : Plaintiffs-Appellants, : No. 111770 v. : AMD
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005-05-24 · Published · cited 5× · 407 F.3d 1262; 366 U.S. App. D.C. 66; 74 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1861; 28 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1189; 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 9419; 2005 WL 1214248
WILLIAMS, Senior Circuit Judge. Plaintiffs challenge the constitutionality of § 514 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act (“URAA”), Pub.L. No. 103-465, 108 Stat. 4809, 4976 (1994), codified at 17 *1263 U.S.C. §§ 104A, 109, which implements Article 18 of the Berne Convention for the Protection of Li
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021-05-11 · Published · cited 0× · 2021 Pa. Super. 93
J-A25022-19; J-A25023-19 2021 PA Super 93 GEORGE ROGERS, ADMINISTRATOR : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF OF THE ESTATE OF JOSHUA ROGERS : PENNSYLVANIA : Appellant : : : v. : : :
Supreme Court of the United States · 2025-06-18 · Published · cited 2× · 605 U.S. 627
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2024 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit
Luck v. Mazzonepublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995-04-20 · Published · cited 19× · 52 F.3d 475; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 9101
52 F.3d 475 Laura LUCK, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Honorable Michael A. MAZZONE, Surrogate and County Judge,Individually and in his Official Capacity, New York StateUnified Court System and Honorable E. Leo Milonas, ChiefAdministrator in his Official Capacity, Defendants-Appellees. No. 1405, Docket 94-9052. United States Court of Appeals,Second Circuit. Ar
Supreme Court of the United States · 2025-06-18 · Published · cited 0× · 605 U.S. 627
PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 605 U. S. Part 2 Pages 627–664 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 18, 2025 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are