Cases

Opinion EDMON, P. J. Edgar Omar Arevalo appeals from the trial court’s order denying his petition for resentencing under the Three Strikes Reform Act of 2012 (hereafter, Proposition 36 or the Act). The Act amended Penal Code 1 sections 667 and 1170.12 (the “Three Strikes” law) to reduce the punishment

Filed 3/9/16 Unmodified version attached CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE THE PEOPLE, B259998 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. N

AFFIRMED and Opinion Filed August 19, 2019 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-00126-CR SILVINO RICARDO AREVALO, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 291st Judicial Distri

NUMBER 13-22-00338-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG BEN AREVALO III, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. On appeal from the 85th District Court

Opinion filed August 31, 2023 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals __________ No. 11-22-00123-CR __________ REY AREVALO, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 161st District Court Ecto

2008 UT App 219 State of Utah, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Juan Carlos Diaz-Arevalo, Defendant and Appellant. Case No. 20060802-CA. Court of Appeals of Utah. Filed June 5, 2008. This opinion is subject to revision before publication in the Pacific Reporter. Joan C. Watt and Nisa J. Sisneros, Salt Lake City, for Appellant. Mark L. Shurtleff and

NUMBER 13-20-00497-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG HUGO AREVALO AND LORENA QUINTANILLA, Appellants, v. JAVIER LLAMAS AND DENISE G. VALLE, Appellees. On appeal from the County C

SELYA, Circuit Judge. This appeal poses two questions, both of first impression in this circuit, arising out of Congress’s 1996 revision of the immigration laws. First, we must determine what standard the new law requires us to apply when considering whether to grant stays of removal pending appeal (we use the terms “removal” and “deportation” interchangeably in this opinion). After

782 A.2d 931 (2001) 344 N.J. Super. 490 German AREVALO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SAGINAW MACHINE SYSTEMS, INC., and SMS Holding Co., Inc., Defendants, and Collins & Aikman Products Co., Inc., Defendant-Respondent. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued October 2, 2001. Decided October 26, 2001.

835 S.W.2d 701 (1992) Alvaro AREVALO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. A14-91-00592-CR. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (14th Dist.). June 18, 1992. *702 Moses M. Sanchez, Houston, for appellant. Scott A Durfee, Houston, for appellee. Before J. CURTISS BROWN, C.J., and SEARS and ELLIS, JJ. <

480 F.3d 1205 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Margaret Ann GORDON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 04-6384. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. March 28, 2007. Submitted on the briefs:* William P. Earley, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Oklah

Dissenting Opinion by: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice I respectfully dissent because I believe there was sufficient evidence to support a reasonable jury’s finding that both the objective and subjective prongs of the gross negligence claim were met. Gross Negligence As noted in the majority opinion, the jury found that the harm to Perez and Arevalo resulted from gross negl

749 S.W.2d 271 (1988) Miguel AREVALO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. 04-86-00580-CR. Court of Appeals of Texas, San Antonio. April 27, 1988. *272 Emilio Alva, Laredo, for appellant. Joe Flores, Dist. Attys. Office, Laredo, for appellee. Before CADENA, C.J., and ESQUIVEL and DIAL, JJ.

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas DISSENTING OPINION No. 04-13-00646-CV Robert Ray PEREZ and Rhonda Lee Arevalo, Appellants v. Arturo Zepeda Arredondo, CUSA KBC, LLC d/b/a Kerrville Bus s

NUMBERS 13-99-442-CR and 13-99-443-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI ___________________________________________________________________ SAMUEL AREVALO, A/K/A SAM GONZALEZ, Appellant,

NUMBER 13-24-00182-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG RAUL TOLEDO, Appellant, v. MARTHA’S VINEYARD MOBILE HOME PARK, Appellee. ON APPEAL FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 5

Affirmed and Opinion Filed May 24, 2021 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-19-01489-CR IRVIN VLADIMI CAMPOS-HERNANDEZ, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 2 Dallas County, Texas

Affirm; Opinion Filed December 20, 2021 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-20-00738-CR No. 05-20-00739-CR JAMES WOOD LAWSON, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court

Opinion filed July 17, 2025 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals __________ No. 11-24-00063-CR __________ WILLIAM CLAY PITTS, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 91st District Court Eastlan