Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Applied Biologics LLC v. Mid-South Medical Management, LLC”
Salomon & Ludwin, LLC v. Jeremiah Winterspublic domain
USCA4 Appeal: 24-1728 Doc: 57 Filed: 08/12/2025 Pg: 1 of 28 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 24-1728 SALOMON & LUDWIN, LLC, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. JEREMIAH WINTERS; CATHERINE ATWOOD; JENNIFER THOMPSON; ABBEY SORENSE
Waverley View Investors, LLC v. United Statespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 15-371 L Filed: January 5, 2018 **************************************** * * Comprehensive Environmental Response, WAVERLEY VIEW INVESTORS, LLC, * Compensation, and Liability Act of *
Waverley View Investors, LLC v. United Statespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 15-371 L Filed: January 5, 2018 **************************************** * * Comprehensive Environmental Response, WAVERLEY VIEW INVESTORS, LLC, * Compensation, and Liability Act of *
Betz v. Pneumo Abex LLCpublic domain
44 A.3d 27 (2012) Diana K. BETZ, Executrix of the Estate of Charles Simikian, Deceased v. PNEUMO ABEX LLC, Successor-in-Interest to Abex Corporation, Allied Signal, Inc., in its own right and as Successor-in-Interest to Allied Corporation, Successor-in-Interest to Bendix Corporation, Borg-Warner Corporation, Carlisle Companies, Inc., Okonite Company, General Motors Corporation, Kelsey-Hayes Company, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company,
Nelson v. Enid Medical Associates, Inc.public domain
EDMONDSON, J. 1 1 In a medical malpractice action we are asked to review orders excluding testimony from plaintiffs' two expert witnesses and a summary judgment granted to defendants based upon the excluded testimony. We conclude the testimony should not have been excluded. We reverse the orders of the District Court exeluding the testimony and granting summary judgment, and remand the cause for further proceedings consistent
NELSON v. ENID MEDICAL ASSOCIATES, INC.public domain
OSCN Found Document:NELSON v. ENID MEDICAL ASSOCIATES, INC. OSCN navigation Home Courts Court Dockets
571 F.3d 206 (2009) ZEREGA AVENUE REALTY CORP. and Fred Todino & Sons, Inc., Plaintiffs-Counter-Defendants-Appellees, v. HORNBECK OFFSHORE TRANSPORTATION, LLC, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Cross-Defendant-Appellant. Docket No. 08-0639-cv. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Heard: March 23, 2009. Decided: July 6, 2009.
East Texas Medical Center Gilmer v. Birder Porterpublic domain
ACCEPTED 12-14-00220-CV TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 9/4/2015 3:01:53 PM
Crystal BLACKWELL, as Next Friend to Jacob Blackwell, a Minor v. SKY HIGH SPORTS NASHVILLE OPERATIONS, LLCpublic domain
OPINION J. Steven Stafford, P.J., W.S., delivered the opinion of the court, in which D. Michael Swiney, C.J., and Brandon 0. Gibson, J., joined. In this interlocutory appeal, the defendant trampoline park argues that the trial court erred by refusing to enforce a forum selection clause, a choice of law
ACCEPTED 01-15-00126-CV
Cactus Corner, LLC v. U.S. Dept. of Agriculturepublic domain
346 F.Supp.2d 1075 (2004) CACTUS CORNER, LLC, a California Limited Liability Corporation; Venida Packing Company, a California Corporation; California Citrus Mutual; and California Grape and Tree Fruit League, Plaintiffs, v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE; Ann V. Veneman, Secretary of Agriculture; and Bobby R. Acord, Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Defendants, InterCitrus, a Spanish Trade Association; Ibertrade Comm
Filed 9/26/24 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR FRIENDS OF THE SOUTH FORK GUALALA, A168163 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Sonoma County v. Super. Ct. No. SCV-268396) DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY AND
McDowell v. Eli Lilly & Co.public domain
OPINION SWEET, District Judge. Defendant Eli Lilly and Company (“Eli Lilly” or the “Defendant”) has moved pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 for summary judgment dismissing the failure-to-warn diversity action brought by the plaintiff Jesse McDowell (“McDowell” or the “Plaintiff”). Based upon the-facts and conclusions set forth below, the Defendant’s motion is granted and the action
Filed 11/22/24 Opinion following rehearing CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR FRIENDS OF THE SOUTH FORK GUALALA, A168163 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Sonoma County v. Super. Ct. No. SCV-2683
Lipitor (Atorvastatin Calcium) Mktg. v. Pfizer, Inc.public domain
DIAZ, Circuit Judge: This appeal arises from a multidistrict litigation ("MDL") in which thousands of women claim that their use of the medication Lipitor caused them to develop diabetes. The women sued Pfizer, Lipitor's manufacturer, asserting various products liability claims. After protracted litigation, the district court granted summary judgment to Pfizer. Plaintiffs now ask us t
OPINION MOLLOY, District Judge: This case involves allegations under the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729-33, that Defendant-Appellee Gilead Sciences, Inc. (Gilead) made false statements about its compliance with Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulations regarding certain HIV drugs, resulting in the receipt of billions of dollars from the government
Dillon v. United Statespublic domain
DOUGLAS P. WOODLOCK, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE I. BACKGROUND In the Third Amended Complaint now framing this litigation, Stephen Dillon and Michael Fisher, seamen who claim to have suffered injury on board government-owned vessels, allege that they, and similarly situated seamen, are entitled to unearned overtime wages as part of the unearned wages remedy under admiralty law. Cf. Pad
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CEDAR PARK ASSEMBLY OF Nos. 23-35560 GOD OF KIRKLAND, 23-35585 WASHINGTON, D.C. No. 3:19-cv- Plaintiff-Appellant / 05181-BHS Cross-Appellee, v. OPINION MYRON KREIDLER, AKA Mike Kreidler, in his official capacity as Insurance Com
Reid v. Metropolitan Life Insurancepublic domain
ORDER AMY TOTENBERG, District Judge. This case is brought under the Employee Retirement Income . Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. Plaintiff Sandra Reid (“Reid”) contends that Defendant Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (“MetLife”) wrongfully terminated her long term disability benefits after 24 months despite substantial medical documentation demonstrating
USCA4 Appeal: 21-2042 Doc: 42 Filed: 02/22/2023 Pg: 1 of 48 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 21-2042 SHELLEY C., Plaintiff – Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,