Cases

ORDER CLARIFYING CONFIRMATION ORDER Karen S. Jennemann, United States Bankruptcy Judge Four unsecured creditors rely on a mistakenly included phrase in the order *845confirming the Debtor’s Plan of Reorganization 1 to argue their prepetition employment related claims remain collectible. The improperly inserted phrase ar

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA PINEVILLE FURNITURE & APPLIANCE COMPANY, INC., FILED Employer Below, Petitioner August 6, 2025 ASHLEY N. DEEM, CHIEF DEPUTY CLERK v.) No. 25-ICA-34 (JCN: 2016018668) INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

11/30/2020 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE October 19, 2020 Session MR. APPLIANCE, LLC V. APPLIANCE SERVICES OF TENNESSEE, LLC, ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Williamson County No. 2019-403 Michael Binkley, Judge

Case: 23-50413 Document: 69-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/21/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 23-50413 FILED

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE APPLIANCE RECYCLING CENTERS ) OF AMERICA, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) C.A. No. N18C-08-272 EMD v. ) ) RECLEIM LLC, )

16 So.3d 922 (2009) Neina BLIZZARD, Appellant, v. APPLIANCE DIRECT, INC., Appellee. No. 5D08-4070. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. August 7, 2009. *924 Maurice Arcadier of Allen & Arcadier, P.A., Melbourne, for Appellant. Christopher J. Coleman and Karl W. Bohne, Jr., of Schillinger & Coleman,

ALBRITTON, District Judge: This is a suit for damages for retaliation under Chapter 8 of Title 29, the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C. §§ 201-219 (“FLSA”). The case presents cross-appeals. Defendant Sei Pak (“Pak”) appeals the district court’s entry of judgment against him individually and its denial of his renewed motions for judgment as a matter of law and remitt

688 F.Supp.2d 957 (2010) SUN MICROSYSTEMS, INC., Plaintiff, v. NETWORK APPLIANCE, INC., Defendant. No. C-07-05488 EDL. United States District Court, N.D. California. February 24, 2010. *959 Carrie Lynne Williamson, David L. Alberti, Eliza Behold, Mark Fowler, Yakov M. Zolotorev, Christine Kerba Corbett, DLA Piper US LLP, East Pal

690 F.Supp.2d 1027 (2010) SUN MICROSYSTEMS, INC., Plaintiff, v. NETWORK APPLIANCE, INC., Defendant. No. C-07-05488 EDL. United States District Court, N.D. California. February 19, 2010. *1029 Carrie Lynne Williamson, David L. Alberti, Eliza Behold, Mark Fowler, Yakov M. Zolotorev, DLA Piper Rudnick Gray Cary US LLP, East Palo Alt

710 F.Supp.2d 925 (2008) SUN MICROSYSTEMS, INC., Plaintiff, v. NETWORK APPLIANCE, INC., Defendant. No. C-07-05488 EDL. United States District Court, N.D. California. December 22, 2008. *928 Carrie Lynne Williamson, David L. Alberti, Eliza Behold, Mark Fowler, Yakov M. Zolotorev, DLA Piper, US, LLP, East Palo Alto, CA, for Plainti

ROBERT A. CHAISSON, Judge. | ¡¡This is an appeal by David Martin from a judgment in favor of A-l Home Appliance Center, Inc. (A-l), and its insurer, Hanover Insurance Company, in this delic-tual action arising out of an in-home accident during delivery of a refrigerator. For the following reasons, we affirm that judgment. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY Mr. Martin bought a refrigerator from

*********** The undersigned have reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Harris and the briefs and arguments of the parties. The appealing party has not shown good grounds to reconsider the evidence, receive further evidence, or rehear the parties and their representatives. Accordingly, the Full Commission affirms with modifications the Opinion and Award of Deputy Commissioner Harr

591 F.Supp.2d 1069 (2008) SUN MICROSYSTEMS, INC., Plaintiff, v. NETWORK APPLIANCE, INC., Defendant. No. C-07-05488 EDL. United States District Court, N.D. California. December 23, 2008. *1070 Carrie Lynne Williamson, David L. Alberti, Eliza Behold, Mark Fowler, Yakov M. Zolotorev, Christine Kerba Corbett, Dla Piper US LLP, East P

686 F.Supp.2d 878 (2010) WOLF APPLIANCE, INC., Plaintiff, v. VIKING RANGE CORP., Defendant. No. 09-cv-697-vis.[1] United States District Court, W.D. Wisconsin. February 11, 2010. *882 Jeffrey A. Simmons, Justin Edwin Gray, Stephan J. Nickels, Foley & Lardner LLP., Madison, WI, for Plaintiff. Anthony J. Sieve

KITCHENS, Justice, dissenting: ¶ 65. The majority reverses and renders the present case for two reasons. First, the majority finds that the trial court erred by denying Mine Safety Appliance Company’s.(MSA’s) motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) on Huey Holmes’s failure-to-warn claims, because Holmes had made an inadequate-warnings claim, as opposed to a claim for lack of any warnings. Second,

146 F.Supp.2d 1334 (2001) ACCESS NOW, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. AMBULATORY SURGERY CENTER GROUP, LTD., et al., Defendants. No. 99109CIV. United States District Court, S.D. Florida. May 2, 2001. *1335 Miguel Manuel De La O, David Everett Marko, De La O & Marko, Miami, FL, for plaintiffs. Ronald M. Rosengarden, Jennif

601 F.3d 414 (2010) ULTIMATE APPLIANCE CC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The KIRBY COMPANY et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 09-3297. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Submitted: March 10, 2010. Decided and Filed: April 1, 2010. *415 ON BRIEF: Joel Levin, Aparesh Paul, Levin & Associates Co., L.P.A., C

374 F.Supp.2d 825 (2005) NETWORK APPLIANCE, INC., Plaintiff, v. BLUEARC CORP., Defendant. No. C 03-5665 MHP. United States District Court, N.D. California. June 27, 2005. *826 *827 *828 Philip A. Rovner, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE, An

Case: 23-1715 Document: 64 Page: 1 Filed: 07/28/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ JIAXING SUPER LIGHTING ELECTRIC APPLIANCE, CO., LTD., OBERT, INC., Plaintiffs-Appellees v. CH LIGHTING TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., ELLIOTT ELECTRIC SUPPLY, INC., SHAOXING RUISING LIGHTING CO., LTD., Defendants-Appellants ________

John Z. Lee, United States District Judge Plaintiffs Sears Home Appliances Showrooms, LLC ("SHAS") and Sears Authorized Hometown Stores, LLC ("SAHS") *804filed suit against Brent and Minena Turley ("the Turleys") and Appliance Alliance, LLC (together, "Defendants") for breaching the parties' franchise agreements. In turn, Defen