⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

4 opinions for “Appelbaum v. Stain-Less, Inc.”

United States Court of Federal Claims · 2016-07-13 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 08-504V (To be published) ***************************** * R.V. and E.V., parents and natural guardians of * Special Master Corcoran L.V., a minor, *
State v. Harrispublic domain
Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2004-10-19 · Published · cited 837× · 859 A.2d 364; 181 N.J. 391; 2004 N.J. LEXIS 1080
Justice LaVECCHIA delivered the opinion of the Court. In 1996, a jury convicted Ambrose Harris of capital murder and sentenced him to death. We affirmed the conviction and sentence, State v. Harris, 156 N.J. 122, 716 A.2d 458 (1998) (Harris I), and in a subsequent proceeding, found defendant’s capital sentence not disproportionate when compared to sentences imposed in similar cases.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004-10-06 · Published · cited 22× · 385 F.3d 1043; 21 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1545; 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 20857; 2004 WL 2238532
385 F.3d 1043 Joseph R. ANDERER, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Police Chief Arthur JONES, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 02-3669. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued February 25, 2003. Decided October 6, 2004. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Appeal from the United States District Court for
Supreme Court of Missouri · 1935-07-30 · Published · cited 63× · 85 S.W.2d 748; 337 Mo. 727; 1935 Mo. LEXIS 416
Plaintiff sued to recover for injury, resulting from dermatitis, alleged to have been caused from a hair dye called Notox, applied by an operator of the defendant. The jury returned a verdict for plaintiff for $12,500. Motion for new trial was filed, but was overruled on condition that a remittitur of $3000 be made, which was done, and judgment went for plaintiff for $9500, and defendant appealed. The petition charges upon five grounds of negligence, viz.: (1) That defendant k