Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
2 opinions for “Aponte v. Femia”
United States v. Figueroa-Quiñonespublic domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER BESOSA, District Judge. Before the Court is defendant Oscar Figueroa-Quinones’ motion to dismiss for improper destruction of evidence (Docket No. 46), joined by defendants Mayco Aponte-Rodriguez and Axel Figueroa-Nieves (Docket Nos. 48 & 50). For the reasons discussed below, the Court DENIES the motion to dismiss. I. Background An i
Haidak v. Collagen Corp.public domain
67 F.Supp.2d 21 (1999) Debbie P. HAIDAK, Plaintiff, v. COLLAGEN CORPORATION, Defendant. No. Civ.A. 98-30056-FHF. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. October 8, 1999. *22 Steven L. Hoffman, Sugarman & Sugarman, Boston, MA, for Debbie P. Haidak, plaintiff. Joe W. Redden, Jr., W. Curt Webb, Houston, TX, Daniel