Cases

151 Ariz. 180 (1985) 726 P.2d 596 David L. RAWLINGS and Elizabeth Rawlings, his wife, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Joseph APODACA and Jane Doe Apodaca, his wife; Farmers Insurance Company of Arizona, an Arizona corporation, Defendants-Appellants. William RANEY, Jr., Pamela Kay Raney, his wife; and Jara Enterprises, an Arizona corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Joseph APODACA and Jane Doe Apodaca, his wife, Defendant

HIGHTOWER, Justice, joined by DOGGETT, GAMMAGE and SPECTOR, Justices, dissenting. On December 31,1992, this court issued an opinion in this cause which held that an injured plaintiff, as the assignee of the insured, is not precluded from recovering damages from the insurer by the existence of a covenant between the plaintiff and the insured to seek relief only from the

599 F.Supp.2d 1165 (2009) Patrice BJORNSTAD as trustee of the Thomas and Isis Davidson Family Trust, on behalf of Isis Davidson, Plaintiff, v. SENIOR AMERICAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign corporation; Black Corporations I-X; White Partnerships I-X; John Does I-X; and Jane Does I-X, Defendants. No. CV-08-00248-PHX-GMS. United States District Court, D. Arizona. March 2, 2009

524 P.2d 874 (1974) HAWKEYE-SECURITY INSURANCE CO., a corporation, Appellant (Plaintiff below), v. Alfred APODACA and Byrlie Lee Apodaca, Appellees (Defendants below). No. 4307. Supreme Court of Wyoming. July 9, 1974. *875 F.M. Andrews, Jr., Riverton, for appellant. Frank P. Hill, Riverton, for Alfred Apodaca, appellee.

TATE, Circuit Judge: The defendant, Apodaca, appeals from his conviction for corporate income tax evasion and for making and subscribing materially false corporate income tax returns. Apodaca raises five issues on appeal: (a) that the jury selection process in the district does not represent a fair cross-section of the community; (b) that certain jurors should have been excused

MEMORANDUM ORDER AND OPINION ON REMAND John L. Kane, U.S. Senior District Judge. This insurance coverage dispute is before me on remand from the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals’ reversal of my earlier opinion granting summary judgment in favor of Defendants. Defendants again move for summary judgment and Plaintiffs cross-move for the same.1 At issue is whether the Defendants

DECISION AND ORDER McMAHON, District Judge. The court, for its rulings in limine on the motions filed by U.S. Bank National Association (“U.S. Bank”) arid PHL Variable Life Insurance Company (“Phoenix”) (see Docket ## 179, 182 in No. 13 Civ. 1580 and Docket ## 386, 389 in No. 12 Civ. 6811), and on an untimely motion for judgment by the pleadings filed by Phoenix, (see Docket # 398

OPINION SERNA, Justice. {1} The City of Albuquerque (City) appeals from the district court’s order, entered in response to the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment, holding that the City’s juvenile Curfew Ordinance (Curfew) violates the New Mexico Constitution and is also preempted by the State Children’s Code. The district court denied the City’s motion for a st

990 P.2d 211 (1999) 128 N.M. 98 1999-NMCA-137 Jerry W. WILLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED MERCANTILE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, a credit life insurance company, Defendant-Appellee. No. 19,600. Court of Appeals of New Mexico. July 12, 1999. *212 M.J. Keefe, Albuquerque, for Appellan

SPECTOR, Justice, announced the judgment of the Court and delivered an opinion in which CORNYN, BAKER and ABBOTT, Justices, join. The two issues in this case are whether any evidence supports an insured’s judgment against her health insurer for breach of the duty of good faith and fair dealing, and whether any evidence supports a punitive damages award. In deciding the first issue, we attempt to ease

OPINION FELDMAN, Justice. ¶ 1 This is a bad faith action in which a class of policyholders of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company sought discovery of files and other documents relating to State Farm’s rejection of their underinsured and uninsured motorist claims. State Farm resisted discovery, arguing the documents were protected by the attorney-client privilege. We granted review to consider the

TROUT, Justice. This is a declaratory judgment action in which Truck Insurance Exchange (Truck) seeks a judicial declaration that it did not act in bad faith in refusing to enter into a settlement agreement with an injured third party. I. BACKGROUND The Dotys purchased an automobile from the Bisharas in 1985 upon which new tires had been installed by Elias Bishara a

841 P.2d 344 (1992) Edward BALLOW; Foot Associates, P.C.; Mark P. Berland; Richard N. Bernhardt; Richard N. Bernhardt, M.D., P.C.; Leonard D. Bernstein, The OB/GYN Associates, P.C.; J. Tashof Bernton; J. Tashof Bernton, M.D., P.C.; Roland J. Brandt; High Country Orthopedic Associates of Colorado Springs, P.C.; Robert A. Brumfield; Rustic Hills Orthopaedic Association, P.C.; W.M. Campbell; Southern Colorado OB/GYN, P.C.; Joseph Carpenter; Joseph Carpenter

APPEL, Justice (dissenting). I respectfully dissent. As will be seen below, I view the case differently than the majority. I. would reverse ,the decision of the district court and allow the insured’s bad-faith claim to proceed to trial. I.' Background Facts and Proceedings. ,. The majority’s overview of the facts and proceedings does not present the entire picture. Afte

107 F.Supp.2d 841 (2000) In re JACKSON NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY PREMIUM LITIGATION No. MDL 1122. United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division. July 5, 2000. *842 *843 *844 *845 Stephen L. Hubbard, Hubbar

*493GORDON, Chief Justice. Jack and Cynthia Hawkins (Hawkins) petitioned this court to review a decision of the court of appeals reversing the trial court’s grant of a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict in favor of Allstate Insurance Company (Allstate) and affirming the trial court’s grant of Allstate’s motion for a new trial. Hawkins v. Allstate Insura

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 14–0298 Filed January 8, 2016 Amended April 6, 2016 BEN VILLARREAL JR., CLEO MARTINEZ, and LaCASA MARTINEZ TEXMEX, INC., Appellants, vs. UNITED FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY d/b/a UNITED FIRE GROUP, Appellee. On review from the Iowa Court of Appeals. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Cerro Gordo County, Rustin T. Davenport, Judge.

763 P.2d 673 (1988) Thomas AINSWORTH, Appellant, v. COMBINED INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Respondent. No. 17625. Supreme Court of Nevada. October 26, 1988. Peter Chase Neumann, Bradley & Drendel, Reno, for appellant. Mortimer, Sourwine, Mousel, Sloane & Knobel, Reno, Lionel, Sawyer & Collins and M. Kristina Pickering, Las Vegas, for respondent.</

FfUIB IN The §6Uftsf Appeals RECEIVED \H Sixth DfStffet The Court of Aopeals Sixth District 1 9 2015

153 Ariz. 95 (1986) 735 P.2d 125 TRUS JOIST CORPORATION, and American Bankers Insurance Company of Florida, individually and as assignee of Trus Joist Corporation, Plaintiffs Counterdefendants-Appellees, Cross-Appellants, v. SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Defendant Counterclaimant-Appellant, Cross-Appellee. No. 1 CA-CIV 7367. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Depart