Cases

THIRD DIVISION MCFADDEN, C. J., DOYLE, P. J., and HODGES, J. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. https://www.gaappeals.us/rules DEADLINES ARE NO LONGER TOLLED IN THIS

SILBERMAN, Judge. In the midst of a very contentious divorce, Jose Antonio Vazquez (the Husband) received military orders assigning him to a post in Norfolk, Virginia. At this point in the proceedings, the Husband had majority time-sharing with the parties’ two young children and Rossy Vazquez-Robel-ledo (the Wife) had limited visitation at a supervised visitation center. It was

ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL ESPECIAL1 ANTONIO L. VÁZQUEZ Revisión procedente del Departamento de Recurrente Corrección y Rehabilitación v. KLRA202500084 Sobre: ADMINISTRACIÓN DE

ORDER PER CURIAM. AND NOW, this 3rd day of September, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The order of the Superior Court is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED to the Superior Court to reconsider in light of our opinion in *249Commonwealth v. Wallace, 626 Pa. 362, 97 A.3d 310 (2014), currently available at 2014

Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL I ANTONIO L. VÁZQUEZ RECURSO DE REVISIÓN Recurrente procedente del Departamento de v. KLRA202300272 Corrección y

OPINION PER CURIAM. Antonio Vazquez appeals from the District Court’s denial of his motion for issuance of a conditional writ of habeas corpus. For the following reasons, we will summarily affirm. In July 2000, a jury sitting in the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas found Vazquez guilty of first-degree murder and a judge sentenced him to life in prison. After filing an unsuccessful direct

OPINION PER CURIAM. Antonio Vazquez appeals from the District Court’s denial of his motion for issuance of a conditional writ of habeas corpus. For the following reasons, we will summarily affirm. In July 2000, a jury sitting in the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas found Vazquez guilty of first-degree murder and a judge sentenced him to life in prison. After filing an unsuccessful direct

ORDER PER CURIAM. AND NOW, this 3rd day of September, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The order of the Superior Court is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED to the Superior Court to reconsider in light of our opinion in Commonwealth v. Wallace, — Pa. -, 97 A.3d 310 (2014), currently available at 2014 WL 357

PER CURIAM: Juan Antonio Vazquez filed an action against the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) seeking to set aside the 2006 forfeiture of more than $7,000, and citing 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 41. The district court held that the forfeiture was based on 21 U.S.C. § 881 and that Vazquez’s exclusive

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied. Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition. Same case below, 430 Fed. Appx. 741.

OPINION BAILEY, Judge. Case Summary The State of Indiana appeals the denial *705 of a motion to correct error 1 challenging a grant of summary judgment to Antonio Gonzalez-Vazquez (“Vazquez”

MEMORANDUM OPINION RICHARD J. LEON, District Judge. This action brought in part under the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), 5 U.S.C. § 552, is on remand from the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit for reconsideration of defendants’ invocation of FOIA exemption 2 in light of Milner v. Dep’t of the Navy, — U.S. —, 131 S.Ct. 1259, 179 L.Ed.2d 268 (2011)

GRIFFIN, J. Appellant, Antonio Vazquez, Jr. [“Vazquez”], appeals the trial court’s denial of his Rule 3.850 motion. We affirm as to all claims. In 2004, Vazquez was charged in a three-count information with aggravated battery with a deadly weapon, aggravated assault with a deadly weapon, and battery. These charges arose out of a domestic dispute during which Vazquez is alleged to have thrown a coffee tabl

764 F.Supp.2d 117 (2011) Juan Antonio VAZQUEZ, Plaintiff, v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 10-0039 (RJL). United States District Court, District of Columbia. February 10, 2011. *118 Juan Antonio Vazquez, Texarkana, TX, pro se. Tyler James Wood, U.S. Attorney's Office for D.C., Washington,

555 F.3d 923 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Juan Antonio VAZQUEZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 08-4044. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. February 10, 2009. *925 Steven B. Killpack, Federal Public Defender, and Scott Keith Wilson, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Salt Lake City, UT, for Defenda

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas February 1, 2023 No. 04-22-00785-CR EX PARTE Luis VAZQUEZ HERNANDEZ From the County Court, Kinney County, Texas Trial Court No. 12657CR Honorable Tully Shahan, Judge Presiding

550 F.3d 270 (2008) Antonio VAZQUEZ, Appellant v. Harry WILSON; The District Attorney of The County of Philadelphia; The Attorney General of The State of Pennsylvania. No. 07-2162. United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. Argued October 27, 2008. Filed: December 19, 2008. *271 Steffen N. Johnson, Luke W. Go

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas January 23, 2023 No. 04-23-00035-CR IN RE Osvaldo Vazquez MONTANEZ Original Mandamus Proceeding ORDER Relators moved to consolidate this original proceeding with Cause Nos. 04-23-00028- CR, 04-23-00029-CR, 04-

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas JUDGMENT No. 04-22-00847-CV Wilbur Cornell ODOM, Appellant v. Patricia VAZQUEZ, Appellee From the 57th Judicial

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-22-00348-CV Isabel Carolina VAZQUEZ, Appellant v. SACATAR PROPERTIES, App