Cases

In a proceeding pursuant to Election Law § 16-102 to invalidate a petition designating (1) Daniel J. Halloran and Jean Leavey as candidates in a primary election to be held on September 13, 2011, for the Republican Party positions of Male Member and Female Member of the Republican Party State Committee from the 25th Assembly District, respectively, (2) Daniel J. Halloran and Andre Pecot as candidates in a primary election to be held on September 13, 2011, fo

The defendant, a former Connecticut resident now living in California, has moved to dismiss this action on the ground of insufficient service of process. Service was allegedly made on the defendant by a deputy sheriff who left a copy of the writ, summons and complaint in the defendant's Connecticut hotel room while the defendant was in Connecticut temporarily on business. The issue presented is whether a hotel room where the defendant was staying at the time service was made is a usual place

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered December 24, 1979, granting summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and denying plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and other relief, is affirmed, with costs to defendant-respondent. In the present action, plaintiff, claiming to be a former employee of the corporation De Pasquale Brothers, Inc., seeks to hold defendant Halloran liable for alleged unpaid wages and commissions under section 630 of the Busin

Per Curiam. “In order to grant a writ of mandamus, the court must find that the relator has a clear legal right to the relief prayed for, that the respondent is under a clear legal duty to perform the requested act, and that relator has no plain and adequate remedy at law.” State, ex rel. Westchester, v. Bacon (1980), 61 Ohio St. 2d 42 [15 O.O.3d 53], paragraph one of the syllabus.

41 N.Y.2d 386 (1977) Frank Halloran et al., Respondents, v. Virginia Chemicals Incorporated, Appellant, and A & E Auto Glass & Service Corporation, Respondent. Virginia Chemicals Incorporated, Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Crown Can Company et al., Third-Party Defendants-Respondents. Court of Appeals of the State of New York. Submitted January 10, 1977 Dec

DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge. On February 8, 1983, Anthony Hall, then an inmate at Pontiac Correctional Center, fatally stabbed Frieda King and stuffed her body .in a closet next to a large walk-in freezer in the prison kitchen. King had been the civilian supervisor of the kitchen at Pontiac. After a brief investigation, Hall was charged with the murder and went to trial before

211 F.3d 658 (1st Cir. 2000) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE,v.ANTHONY M. SHEA, DEFENDANT, APPELLANT.UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE,v.MICHAEL K. O'HALLORAN DEFENDANT, APPELLANT.UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE,v.PATRICK J. MCGONAGLE, DEFENDANT, APPELLANT.UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE,v.STEPHEN G. BURKE, DEFENDANT, APPELLANT.UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE,v.MATTHEW MCDONALD, D

The majority opinion holds that the evidence in this case establishes as a matter of law that Herbig and the defendant, Halloran, were concurrently negligent in causing plaintiff's damage, and consequently the general release without reservations given by plaintiff to Herbig, upon a substantial consideration, operated to release the defendant. "Concurrent negligence" arises where an injury is proximately caused by the concurring wrongful acts or omissions of two or more persons acting

White, J. Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (initiated in this Court pursuant to CPLR 506 [b] [1]) to, inter alia, prohibit respondent Essex County Judge from enforcing a trial order of dismissal in connection with a particular criminal action. This proceeding arose as a result of a six-count indictment returned by the Essex County Grand Jury on May 20, 1996 charging respondent Richard E. Connors w

* NOTE: Opinion filed at September Term, 1939, May 4, 1940; respondent's motions for rehearing and to transfer to Court en Banc filed; motions overruled at May Term, 1940, July 3, 1940. This is an action by Elizabeth Schwind, the widow of Charles A. Schwind, against Anthony A. O'Halloran, as Administrator pendente lite of the estate of Charles A. Schwind, deceased, and Ferdinand Schwind and Eugene Schwind. Plaintiff see

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Anthony M. Shea Case No. 19-cv-1006-SM v. Opinion No. 2021 DNH 178 United States of America O R D E R Petitioner, Anthony Shea, raises issues in this Section 2255 (28 U.S.C. § 2255) case that are substantively identical to those raised by his codefendants McDonald and O’Halloran.

JON 0. NEWMAN, Chief Judge: On this criminal appeal, which is before our Court on remand from the Supreme Court, we have given in banc consideration to a fairly narrow issue of evidence that has potentially broad implications for the administration of criminal justice. The issue concerns Rule 804(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Evidence, which provides that testimony given by a currently unavailable witness at a prior hearing

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE THE HONORABLE GERALD W. ) HOCKER and STEVEN ) WASHINGTON, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2026-1021-BWD ) THE HONORABLE ANTHONY J. ) ALBENCE,

BAUER, Circuit Judge. Happy Radio, a closely held corporation formally incorporated on May 14, 1980, entered an agreement with Defendants E.B. and Naomi Groen, sole shareholders of Bret Broadcasting Company, in April 1980 to buy all of the Groens’ stock in Bret Broadcasting over a twelve-year period. During this period, Happy Radio had the right to manage Bret Broadcasting’s rad

*781Opinion DUARTE, J. — This case returns to us on remand from the California Supreme Court for reconsideration in light of People v. Banks (2015) 61 Cal.4th 788 [189 Cal.Rptr.3d 208, 351 P.3d 330] (Banks), which articulated the standards to apply in determining whether an accomplice who lacks the intent to kill may qualify as

ORDER After the Village of Forest Park, Illinois, declined to renew William Messner’s license to operate a business from his rented home, he sued under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claiming, as relevant here, that the village, its mayor, and several municipal employees had violated his right to equal protection by treating him differently from all other licensees. The district court granted summary judgment for the defendants and denied Messner’s

OPINION SUE E. MYERSCOUGH, United States District Judge: Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Amended Complaint Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) (d/e 14). Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. (1) Plaintiff Terry Hoffman’s Complaint plausibly alleges a prima facie case for First Amendment retaliation; (2) Hoffman cannot sue State’s Attorney Dan Markwell in his

GEORGE B. DANIELS, United States District Judge: Plaintiff Everton Sterling, pro se, moves by order to show cause for the issuance of a preliminary injunction and temporary restraining *725order enjoining Defendants from interfering with his interests in the property located at 726 East 219 Street, Bronx, New York 10467 (the "Property"

PER CURIAM. These are five pro se applications for a certificate of appealability (COA), filed by petitioners Anthony Shea, Matthew McDonald, Stephen Burke, Michael O’Hallo-ran, and Patrick McGonagle. Petitioners were convicted at a joint trial of various offenses related to a series of bank and armored-car robberies and were sentenced to lengthy prison terms. Except in one mino

(2008) Helen KARNEY, Executrix of the Estate of Anthony E. Karney, Plaintiff, v. LEONARD TRANSPORTATION CORP. and Eugene Badger, Defendants. No. 3:05-cv-1785 (WWE). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. June 23, 2008. MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND MOTION TO STRIKE WARREN W. EGINTON, Senior Distr