Cases

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge GREGORY wrote the opinion, in which Judge AGEE and Judge DIAZ joined. GREGORY, Circuit Judge: On August 15, 2013, a jury awarded Donna Cisson $250,000 in compensatory damages on a design defect and failure to warn claim against C.R. Bard, Inc. (“Bard”), and awarded an additional $1,750,000 in punitive damages. The puniti

ORDER PATRICK J. SCHILTZ, District Judge. Plaintiffs Anthony and Philip Conway founded and operated Rochester Medical Corporation (“RMC”), a publicly traded medical-device company. C.R. Bard, Inc., (“Bard”) offered to purchase RMC at a very attractive price. There was a hitch, though: Bard would go forward with the deal only if the Conways would sign five-year non-compete agreements. The Con-ways reluctan

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER (Motion for a New Trial) JOSEPH R. GOODWIN, District Judge. Pending before the court is Defendant C.R. Bard, Inc.’s Motion for a New Trial [Docket 450]; Defendant C.R. Bard, Inc.’s Request for Ruling, or Alternatively for Hearing, on Motion for New Trial [Docket 479]; and Defendant C.R. Bard, Inc.’s Second Request for Ruling, or Alternatively for

870 F.Supp. 1085 (1994) Dan BERAHA, M.D., Plaintiff, v. C.R. BARD, INC., B & K Medical A/S and B & K Medical Systems Inc., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 1:88-CV-2823-JTC. United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division. July 28, 1994. *1086 *1087 Thomas C. Harney, Mary Lillian W

*600MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER (Daubert Motions) JOSEPH R. GOODWIN, District Judge. Pending before the court are C.R. Bard, Inc. (“Bard”)’s Daubert motions:1 Defendant C.R. Bard, Inc.’s Motion to Limit the Opinions and Testimony of Denniz Zol-noun, M.D., M.P.H. [Docket 91]; Defendant C.R

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS NO . 03-981 JOHN R. GALLAGHER, APPELLANT , V. ANTHONY J. PRINCIPI, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE. Before FARLEY, IVERS, and STEINBERG, Judges. ORDER On September 26, 2003, in a single-judge order, the Court dismissed Mr. Gallagher's appeal of the February 14, 20

657 F.Supp.2d 1069 (2009) ST. FRANCIS MEDICAL CENTER, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. C.R. BARD, INC., Defendant. No. 1:07cv0031 TCM. United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Southeastern Division. September 28, 2009. *1076 Christopher Studebaker, David E. Kovel, Karina Shostakovsky, Kenn

NO. 07-04-0573-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL D SEPTEMBER 7, 2005 ______________________________ JASON ANTHONY JUVENAL,

AMY BERMAN JACKSON, United States District Judge Plaintiff Gary Anthony brought this action against defendants District Lodge 1, a union affiliated with the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, and the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers National Pension Fund (the "Fund"). Compl. [Dkt. # 1] at 1-2. He alleges that defendants violated the terms of the Plan and breached their fiducia

LOURIE, Circuit Judge. Arjun Singh appeals from the remand decision of the United States Patent and Trademark Office Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences awarding judgment in an interference to Anthony Brake. Brake v. Singh, Inter. No. 102,728, Paper No. 199 (Bd. Pat.App. & Inter. June 19, 2001). Because the Board’s decision was supported by substant

OPINION OF THE COURT Pigott, J. Plaintiff Sean R. was born with severe mental and physical disabilities, which he attributes to in útero exposure to unleaded gasoline vapor caused by a defective fuel hose in his mother’s BMW. The question on this appeal is whether the courts below properly

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX ERBEY HOLDING CORPORATION; JOHN R. CASE NO. SX-2018-CV-00146 ERBEY FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, BY ITS GENERAL PARTNER JUPITER CAPITAL INC.; SALT Complex Litigation Division POND HOLDINGS, LLC; MUNUS, L.P.; CARISMA TRUST, BY ITS TRUSTEE VENIA, LLC; TRIBUE Action for Damages LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; AND ALTISOURCE ASSET MANAGEMENT CORPORATION,

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX ERBEY HOLDING CORPORATION; JOHN R. CASE NO. SX-2018-CV-00146 ERBEY FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, BY ITS GENERAL PARTNER JUPITER CAPITAL INC.; SALT Complex Litigation Division POND HOLDINGS, LLC; MUNUS, L.P.; CARISMA TRUST, BY ITS TRUSTEE VENIA, LLC; TRIBUE Action for Damages LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; AND ALTISOURCE ASSET MANAGEMENT CORPORATION,

Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge LOURIE. Opinion concurring in the judgment filed by Circuit Judge GAJARSA. LOURIE, Circuit Judge. Arjun Singh appeals from the judgment of the United States Patent and Trademark Office Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences awarding priority of invention to Anthony J. Brake. See Singh v. Brake, Paper No. 164 (BPAI May 11, 1998). Because certain of

SCHALL, Circuit Judge. Phillip Andre appeals from the order of the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (“Veterans Court”) that dismissed part of his appeal for lack of jurisdiction and affirmed the rest. Andre v. West, 14 Vet.App. 7 (2000). The Veterans Court concluded that it lacked jurisdiction over Mr. Andre’s appeal insofar as it related to

400 A.2d 1023 (1979) BARD BUILDING SUPPLY CO., INC. d/b/a Bard Home Decorating Center v. UNITED FOAM CORPORATION. No. 229-78. Supreme Court of Vermont. April 3, 1979. *1024 Anthony B. Lamb of Paul, Frank & Collins, Inc., Burlington, for plaintiff. Brooke Pearson of Gravel, Shea & Wright, Burlington, for defendant.<

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued May 1, 2002 Decided June 21, 2002 Nos. 02-5052 & 02-5053 Timothy C. Pigford, et al., Appellees v. Ann M. Veneman, Secretary, United States Department of Agriculture, Appellant Appeals from the Uni

PAULINE NEWMAN, Circuit Judge. This exclusion action was initiated on the complaint of Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and Ultimate Abrasive Systems L.L.C. (collectively “3M”) under 19 U.S.C. § 1337(a)(l)(B)(ii), formerly § 1337(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended (variously called § 337(a)). The International Trade Commission found that the process claimed in United

MARKEY, Chief Judge. Appeal from a summary judgment of the United States District Court for the Central District of Illinois in favor of Charles R. Christianson and International Trade Services, Inc. (ITS) (Christianson). The court held Colt Industries Operating Corp. (Colt) liable under: (1) sections 4 and 16 of the Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. §§ 15, 26) and sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act (15 U.S.C. §§ 1, 2), because Colt

ESCHBACH, Senior Circuit Judge. The primary question we address in this appeal is whether this court has appellate jurisdiction over the dispute. For the reasons stated below, we will hold that the instant case “arises under” the patent laws of the United States and, therefore, that exclusive jurisdiction over the appeal from the di