Cases

91 P.3d 683 (2004) 2004 OK CIV APP 51 Jewell A. DYER, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. EMERGENCY CARE, INC., an Oklahoma corporation, and Mark Brandenburg, M.D., Defendants/Appellees, and Saint Francis Hospital, an Oklahoma corporation, Defendant. No. 97,917. Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, Division No. 3. May 7, 2004.

OSCN Found Document:THURSTON v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSUR. CO. THURSTON v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSUR. CO.2020 OK 105Case Number: 118636Decided: 12/08/2020THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA Cite as: 2020 OK 105, __ P.3d __ NOTICE: THIS OPINION HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED FOR PUBLICATION. UNTIL RELE

749 A.2d 434 (2000) In the Matter of Lawrence D. GREENBERG. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Submitted July 14, 1999. Decided March 22, 2000. *435 Anthony T. Verwey, Blue Bell, for Disciplinary Board. James C. Schwartzman, for Lawrence D. Greenberg. Before FLAHERTY, C.J., and ZAPPALA, CAPPY, CASTILLE, NIGRO and SAYLOR, JJ.

OPINION AND ORDER GREGORY K. FRIZZELL, CHIEF JUDGE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Before the court is the Motion for Partial Judgment on the Pleadings [Dkt. # 13] of defendant the Bank of America, N.A. (“BANA”). This case involves a dispute over a residential mortgage taken out by plaintiffs Mark and Sharon Horton in December 1985. The Hortons brought this action against BANA in January 2016, alleging b

433 F.Supp.2d 523 (2006) Anthony DIMEO, III v. Tucker MAX No. Civ.A. 06-1544. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. May 26, 2006. *524 Matthew B. Weisberg, Prochniak Poet & Weisberg P.C., Morton, PA, for Anthony Dimeo, III. Michael K. Twersky, Montgomery McCracken Walker and Rhoads LLP, Philadelphia, PA, for

Affirmed as Modified and Opinion Filed June 9, 2014 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-12-01398-CR No. 05-12-01687-CR DARIUS EDWARDS, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

MEMORANDUM OPINION ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, United States District Judge Before the Court is the defendants’ oral motion of October 25, 2013 to dismiss the superseding indictment [304] returned against them. The defendants allege that the government obtained the superseding indictment in violation of Kastigar v. United States, 406 U.S. 441, 92 S.Ct. 1653, 32 L.Ed.2d 212 (1972), by using the def

ORDER AND JUDGMENT* BRORBY, Senior Circuit Judge. After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously to grant the parties’ request for a decision on the briefs without oral argument. See Fed. RApp. P. 34(f); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. In this diversity med

Affirmed as Modified and Opinion Filed June 9, 2014 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-12-01398-CR No. 05-12-01687-CR DARIUS EDWARDS, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Per Curiam. {¶ 1} Respondent, William Lawrence Summers of Cleveland, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0013007, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 1969 and is also licensed to practice in Kentucky. {¶ 2} On April 12, 2010, relator, disciplinary counsel, charged Summers with several violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct arising from his rep

*690OPINION AND ORDER IMPOSING RECIPROCAL DISCIPLINE Respondent, William L. Summers, whose last known bar roster address is 5910 Landerbrook Drive, Suite 200, May-field Heights, Ohio 44124, and whose KBA Member No. is 82365, was admitted to the practice of law in the Commonwealth of Kentucky in 1988. Since 1969, he has also been licensed to practice law in Ohio, but he was recent

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________ No. 04-3183 RALPH NADER, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. JOHN KEITH, et al., Defendants-Appellees. ____________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the North

Vacated and remanded by published opinion. Judge MOTZ wrote the opinion, in which Judge DAVIS and Judge WYNN joined. DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, Circuit Judge: The Commonwealth of Virginia (“Virginia”) brings this action against Kathleen Sebelius, the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (“the Secretary”). Virginia challenges one provision of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act as an u

689 So.2d 691 (1997) Barbara LACHNEY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON/ORTHO BIOTECH, Defendant-Appellant. No. 96-724. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit. February 19, 1997. Writ Denied May 1, 1997. *692 Jay Anthony Pucheu, Marksville, Chris J. Roy, Jr., Alexandria, for Barbara Lachney. <

POSNER, Circuit Judge. Ralph Nader, joined by his campaign committee and two registered Illinois voters who support his candidacy, brought this suit to require the State of Illinois to place his name on the ballot for the forthcoming Presidential election. He appeals to us from the district court’s denial of a preliminary injunction that would order the state to do that. We have e

ALTIMARI, Circuit Judge: The principal issue raised by the instant appeal following a nonjury trial in the United States District Court for the Western District of New York (Elfvin, J.) is whether efforts by the Secretary of Health and Human Services (the “Secretary”) to improve the quality and efficiency of the work of Administrative Law Judges (“AUs”) impaired their asserted right to “decisional independence” under the Admi

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 04–3183 RALPH NADER, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. JOHN KEITH, et al., Defendants-Appellees. __________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for th

ROVNER, Circuit Judge. Lisa Williamson was arrested along with her husband Lance on a charge that they had stolen someone else’s horse. After being acquitted on the charge, Williamson filed suit against two Lake County, Illinois sheriffs deputies pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that they arrested her without probable cause in violation of the Fourth Amendment and deprived

ORDER AND JUDGMENT * Per Curiam Plaintiffs filed these actions in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma to challenge a regulation issued by the Environmental Protection Agency defining the term “waters of the United States” for purposes of the Clean Water Act. The district court dismissed both cases, concluding

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-04-00750-CV Capital City Church of Christ, Appellant v. Ralph Martin Novak, Jr.; Robert E. Reetz, Jr. and Hilgers & Watkins P.C., Appellees FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 98TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. GN303974, HONORABLE PETER M. LOWRY, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORA