Cases

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA HECTOR CASTELLANOS et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al., Defendants and Appellants; PROTECT APP-BASED DRIVERS AND SERVICES et al., Interveners and Appellants. S279622 First Appellate District, Division Four A163655 Alameda County Superior

847 A.2d 272 (2004) STATE of Rhode Island et al. v. John J. PARTINGTON et al. No. 2003-142-Appeal. Supreme Court of Rhode Island. May 3, 2004. *273 Richard B. Wooley, for Plaintiffs. Peter A. Clarkin, Gary T. Gentile, Warwick, for Defendants. Present: WILLIAMS, C.J., FLANDERS, GOLDBERG, FLAHERTY, and SUTTELL, JJ.

202 P.3d 507 (2008) Colleen WHITE, an individual; Connor White and Alexa White, minor children of Eric and Colleen White, by and through their mother, Colleen White; James White and Christine White, husband and wife; Lynn McMinn, an individual on her own behalf and on behalf of all other statutory beneficiaries of Jason Wolfe, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. STATE of Arizona, a body politic; Maricopa County, a body politic; Value Options, Inc., a Virgi

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA ALAMEDA COUNTY DEPUTY SHERIFF’S ASSOCIATION et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. ALAMEDA COUNTY EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION et al., Defendants and Respondents; STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al., Interveners and Appellants. **** CONTRA COSTA COUNTY DEPUTY SHERIFF’S ASSOCIATION et al., Plaintiffs

BERZON, Circuit Judge. “The practice of relatives or kin parenting children when their parents cannot is a time-honored tradition in most cultures.” Kinship Care: A Natural Bridge: A Report of the Child Welfare League of America (1994). Increasingly, our own society has turned to relatives for assistance in providing foster homes to children in need of them.1 The issue here is under what circumsta

321 F.3d 835 STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, Plaintiff, andEnedina Rosales, Intervenor-Appellant,v.Tommy G. THOMPSON, Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services,* Defendant-Appellee. No. 00-17266. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted February 12, 200

Filed 4/12/23 (unmodified opn. attached) CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR HECTOR CASTELLANOS et al., Plaintiffs and A163655 Respondents, v. (Alameda County Super. Ct. No. RG21088725) STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al.,

Filed 3/13/23 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR HECTOR CASTELLANOS et al., Plaintiffs and A163655 Respondents, (Alameda County v. Super. Ct. No. STATE OF CALIFORNIA RG21088725) et al., Defendants and Appellants, PROTECT APP-BASED DRI

DECISION The issue before the Court relates to the criminal case ofState v. Michael Derderian, case number K1-03-0655A. On February 20, 2003, the Defendant's nightclub, The Station, burned to the ground, killing 100 people. The Defendant was charged with 100 counts of involuntary manslaughter under the criminal negligence theory and 100 counts of involuntary manslaughter under the misdemeanor manslaughter theory.<

Opinion TOBRINER, J. In this case, an experienced bartender, knowing that a patron had just turned 21 years of age that very day, served his young customer 10 straight shots of 151 proof rum, as well as a vodka coffins and 2 beer chasers, during a period of less than an hour and a half; as a result, the 21-year-old patron died the next day, leaving 2 small childre

488 F.Supp.2d 1000 (2007) Manual LOPES, et al., Plaintiff, v. George VIEIRA, et al., Defendant. No. CV-F-06-1243 OWW/SMS. United States District Court, E.D. California. May 30, 2007. *1001 *1002 *1003 George M. Lee, Seiler Epstein Ziegler & Applegate LL

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 490 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 491 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT