Cases

OPINION AND ORDER SEIBEL, District Judge. Before the Court are the Motions to Dismiss of Defendants City of White Plains (the “City”), Police Officers Maurice Love, Steven Demchuk, and Marek Mar*374kowski, Sergeants Stephen Fottrell and Keith Martin, and Lieutenant James Spencer (collectively, the “City Defendants”), (Doc. 45), Defendant White Plai

16-3935 Chamberlain v. City of White Plains In the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit August Term, 2018 Argued: March 22, 2018 Decided: May 29, 2020 Docket No. 16-3935

21-2019 Bartlett v. Baasiri In the United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term, 2022 No. 21-2019 ROBERT BARTLETT, TERREL CHARLES BARTLETT, LINDA JONES, SHAWN BARTLETT, MAXINE E. CROCKETT, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF RICKY LEON CROCKETT, MARVISE L. CROCKETT, TRACIE ARSIAGA, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF ROBERT R. ARSIAG

Cite as 2015 Ark. 200 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS IN RE SUSPENSIONS OF Opinion Delivered May 7, 2015 ATTORNEYS WHO FAILED TO PAY ANNUAL ATTORNEY-LICENSE FEE PER CURIAM On May 14, 2014, we held unconstitutional former Rule VII(C) of the Rules Governing Admission to the Bar to the extent the former rule provided for the suspension of attorneys

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1582 JIHAD ADBUL-MUMIT; MATTHEW ABEDI; MONICA ADAIR SARGENT; MARK AGEE; ALIZ AGOSTON; YVONNE ALSTON; DAN AMATRUDA; KRISTY AMBROSE; KIMBERLEY AMICK; WANDA G. AMOS; CHRISTOPHER ARAUZA; CARL ARSENAULT; BROOKE ASHER; MICHELLE ATKINS; RAYMOND O. ATKINS; MATTHEW ATWELL; DAVID AUB; SOHA AYYASH; ASIF AZIZ; SUSAN BAILEY; KAREN BAKER; HAB BA

Affirmed in Part and Reversed and Remanded in Part and Opinion filed February 13, 2003 Affirmed in Part and Reversed and Remanded in Part and Opinion filed February 13, 2003.

102 S.W.3d 205 (2003) HRN, INC., et al.,[1] Appellants, v. SHELL OIL COMPANY, Motiva Enterprises, L.L.C., Equilon Enterprises, L.L.C., and Equiva Services, L.L.C., Appellees. No. 14-01-00597-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (14th Dist.). February 13, 2003. Rehearing Overruled May 1, 2003. *207 Ge

George Z. Singal, United States District Judge Before the Court is a Motion for Summary Judgment by Defendants St. John Valley Soil and Water Conservation District, Duane Theriault, and Kurt Coulombe (ECF No. 67 ) ("Joint Motion") and a Motion *327for Summary Judgment by Defendant David Potter (ECF No. 68 ) ("Potter's Motion"). After careful re

491 U.S. 164 (1989) PATTERSON v. McLEAN CREDIT UNION No. 87-107. Supreme Court of United States. Argued February 29, 1988 Reargued October 12, 1988 Decided June 15, 1989 CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT *167 Julius LeVonne Chambers reargued the cause

113 F.Supp.2d 441 (2000) Akil AL-JUNDI, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Vincent MANCUSI, et al., Defendants. No. 75-CV-132. United States District Court, W.D. New York. August 28, 2000. *442 Ellen Yacknin, Rochester, NY, Brooklyn, NY, Michael Deutsch, Chicago, IL, Dennis Cunningham,

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER1 JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) the Defendants’ Opposed Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint for Violation of Civil Rights, filed August 16, 2013 (Doe. 26) (“MTD”); and (n) the Plaintiffs Opposed Motion to Amend Complaint and Memorandum Brief in Support Thereof, filed May 30, 2014 (Doc

548 F.Supp. 875 (1982) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. DALLAS COUNTY COMMISSION, et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 78-578-H. United States District Court, S. D. Alabama, N. D. September 10, 1982. *876 W. A. Kimbrough, Jr., U. S. Atty., Mobile, Ala., J. Gerald Hebert and Ellen M. Weber, Voting Section, Civ. Rights Div., Dept

ACCEPTED 03-15-00293-CV 8312780 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

ACCEPTED 04-14-00829-cv 04-14-00829-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXA

Report to the Senate. On motion of the parties, and a stipulation filed by the parties requesting that the facts therein agreed to be found by the court, the court adopted as its special findings of fact the stipulation with the affidavit appended thereto, and rendered a decision in accordance with its opinion in the case of Maud M. Wright and Maxine Roberts, formerly Maxine Mills v. United States, Congressional No. 17850, decided March

548 F.Supp. 794 (1982) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. DALLAS COUNTY COMMISSION, et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 78-578-H. United States District Court, S. D. Alabama, S. D. September 3, 1982. *795 W. A. Kimbrough, Jr., U. S. Atty., Mobile, Ala., J. Gerald Hebert and Ellen M. Weber, Voting Section, Civ. Rights Div., Dept.

ACCEPTED 03-15-00409-CV 8019009 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 11/30/2015 4:14:06 PM

ACCEPTED 03-14-00725-CV 3737749 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 1/12/2015 4:19:03 PM

ACCEPTED 04-15-00469-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 9/3

THACKER, Circuit Judge: This appeal arises from the dismissal of three consumer actions based on Virginia state law claims. The actions focus on a series of misrepresentations made by Hyundai Motor America ("Hyundai") regarding the Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") estimated fuel economy for the 2011, 2012, and 2013 models of the Hyundai Elantra. A Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation ("JPML") consolidated dozens of si