Cases

HENDERSON, Circuit Judge, concurring in Part VI: I write separately to express my view that the aftermath of Slatten’s mandamus petition did not, and could not, give rise to a realistic likelihood of prosecutorial vindictiveness. United States v. Meyer, 810 F.2d 1242, 1246 (D.C. Cir. 1987). Although the majority notes that “the extraordinary mandamus grant here, followed by a rather sharply-worde

DANIEL L. DYSART, Judge. | jPeter Yokum (‘Yokum”) and Polly Anderson (“Anderson”), Vieux Carre Property Owners Residents and Associates, Inc., and French Quarter Citizens, Inc., filed suit against Nicholas S. Karno II, Inc., d/b/a Old Opera House (“Karno”), requesting that a preliminary injunction be issued against Karno for violation of existing statutes and ordinances prohibiting excessive noise at its establishment in the F

PER CURIAM. Smith appeals his judgment and sentence after a jury found him guilty of burglary and petit theft, and the trial court found him in violation of probation. Smith argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal. We affirm as to that issue. Smith also argues, and the State concedes, that the trial court erred in failing to enter a sufficient

SUMMARY ORDER UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of said district court be and it hereby is AFFIRMED IN PART and the cause is REMANDED. Plaintiff-appellant Jason B. Nicholas appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of defendants Tucker and Selsky and the district court’s qualified immunity ruling in favor of defendant Cook, resulting in t

PER CURIAM. Defendants Anthony Tiano and Nicholas Lord appeal their criminal convictions on twelve counts of wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343 (1982). 1 Defendants were *1029 convicted, after a jury trial, for their involvemen

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan March 28, 2014 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan July 29, 2014 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF SUSAN B. ANTHONY LIST’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON DEFAMATION (Doc. 34) TIMOTHY S. BLACK, District Judge. This civil action is currently before the Court on Plaintiff Susan B. Anthony List’s (“SBA List’s”) motion for summary judgment on Mr. Driehaus’s counterclaim for defamation (Doc. 34), and the parties’ responsive memoranda (Docs. 53, 58). The Court heard oral argument on 7/12/

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan February 28, 2014 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice 148172

JOHNSON, Circuit Judge: Defendant Anthony Nicholas Carrion appeals his conviction, arguing that the district court should have instructed the jury on the issue of entrapment. Defendant Fred Solmor appeals his conviction, arguing that the district court erred in imposing consecutive sentences for possession with intent to distribute and distribution, in denying severance of the

State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department Decided and Entered: July 23, 2015 106085 ________________________________ THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v MEMORANDUM AND ORDER MICHAEL A. NICHOLAS, Appellant. ________________________________ Calendar Date: May 28, 2015 Bef

Matter of Nicholas L. (Melissa L.) (2021 NY Slip Op 05746) Matter of Nicholas L. (Melissa L.) 2021 NY Slip Op 05746 Decided on October 21, 2021 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Report

Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 07/10/2024 06:09 PM CDT - 308 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 316 Nebraska Reports STATE V. ANTHONY Cite as 316 Neb. 308 State of Nebraska, appellee, v.

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS Elizabeth Smith, Plaintiff Below, Petitioner FILED May 26, 2020 vs.) No. 19-0105 (Nicholas County 17-C-141) EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK S

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed July 3, 2024. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D22-1836 Lower Tribunal No. M19-4397 ________________ Michael Anthony Arcamone, Appellant,

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT NICHOLAS DeFRIES, No. 23-35119 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:21-cv-00205-SB v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD OPINION COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court

Appellate Case: 21-6015 Document: 010110630862 Date Filed: 01/12/2022 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS January 12, 2022

OPINION OF THE COURT STAPLETON, Circuit Judge: I. The United States appeals from an order acquitting the defendants on two counts of a multicount indictment after a jury had returned guilty verdicts as to those counts. The district court ruled that, as applied to the indictment before it, 18 U.S.C. § 666 was ambiguous. It applied the

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT MICHAEL ANTHONY REEVES, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v.

Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC17-1975 ____________ GENGHIS NICHOLAS KOCAKER, Appellant, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. ____________ N