Cases

ORDER The opinion in the above-captioned matter filed on February 25, 2015, and published at 778 F.3d 1096, is amended and replaced by the amended opinion filed concurrently with this order. With this amendment, no petitions for rehearing or requests for amendment will be accepted. OPINION GOULD, Circuit Judge: Anthony Nigro appeals the district court’s entry of sum

*795Memorandum Opinion and Order Edmond E. Chang, United States District Judge I. Introduction Weber-Stephen Products LLC ■ makes and sells Weber grills. Sears Holding Corporation and Sears, Roebuck & Company own and operate retail and online stores.1 Sears also makes and sells its own grills under t

349 F.3d 1326 Marian SEARS, Claimant-Appellant,v.Anthony J. PRINCIPI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee. No. 03-7005. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. DECIDED: November 20, 2003. Kenneth M. Carpenter, Carpenter Chartered, of Topeka, KS, argued for claimant-appellant.

IVERS, Judge, filed the opinion of the Court. STEINBERG, Judge, filed a concurring opinion. IVERS, Judge: Veteran Virgil G. Lawton, through his legal custodian, the appellant, Marian Sears, appeals a May 25, 1999, decision of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA or Board), which denied an effective date earlier than October 26, 1995, for service connection for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The May

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ANTHONY V. NIGRO, No. 12-57262 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 3:11-cv-01541- MMA-JMA SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO., Defendant-Appellee. ORDER AND

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ANTHONY V. NIGRO, No. 12-57262 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 3:11-cv-01541- MMA-JMA SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO., Defendant-Appellee. OPINION Appeal from t

946 F.Supp. 1241 (1996) Henry TASSIN, et al., v. SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO., et al. Civil Action No. 93-147. United States District Court, M.D. Louisiana. December 5, 1996. *1242 *1243 Anthony M. Fazzio, Lafayette, LA, Daniel J. McGlynn, McGlynn, Blanchfield & Glisson, Baton Rouge, LA, for Hen

[Cite as Sears v. Sears, 2012-Ohio-5968.] COURT OF APPEALS KNOX COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT CATHY A. SEARS JUDGES: Hon. W. Scott Gwin, P.J. Plaintiff-Appellee Hon. William B. Hoffman, J. Hon. Julie A. Edwar

CRABB, Chief District Judge. Appellants John H. Sears, Dorothy M. Sears, William J. Sears, Connie J. Sears, Todd A. Sears, Christopher J. Sears, Herman T. Hinshaw and Ruth A. Hinshaw appeal the district court’s dismissal of their complaint raising claims against defendants under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), the Securities Act of 1933, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and Rule 10b-5 (17 C.F.R

FILED TN COURT OF 1\, OR'IURS' ,C . ·fR 'ATIO ClAIMS

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS ANTHONY G. BUZBEE AND THE § No. 08-20-00138-CV BUZBEE LAW FIRM, § Appeal from the Appellants, § Court District Court v.

DECISION AND ORDER ELIZABETH A. WOLFORD, United States District Judge This case involved a hotly-contested dispute as to whether the plaintiff, Christina Costa, was unlawfully retaliated against by her former employer in violation of Title VII. After discovery and dispositive motion practice, a jury trial commenced in October 2015. Before the jury rendered a final verdict, the parties resolved the underlyi

DECISION AND ORDER ELIZABETH A. WOLFORD, United States District Judge. BACKGROUND On April 30, 2012, Plaintiff Christina Costa (“Plaintiff’) commenced this action alleging unlawful retaliation against Defendants Sears Home Improvement Products, Inc. (“SHIP”), and Sears Holdings Corporation (collectively, “Defendants”) in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

DECISION AND ORDER ELIZABETH A. WOLFORD, District Judge. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Christina Costa (“Plaintiff’) brings this retaliation action against De*338fendants Sears Home Improvement Products, Inc. (“SHIP”), and Sears Holdings Corporation (collectively, “Defendants”) pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act o

(2008) Willie DUNN, Petitioner, v. Lawrence F. SEARS, Respondent. No. 06 CV 4757 (VM). United States District Court, S.D. New York. June 18, 2008. DECISION AND ORDER VICTOR MARRERO, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Pro se petitioner Willie Dunn ("Dunn") seeks a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254

FOURTH DIVISION DILLARD, P. J., RICKMAN and BROWN, JJ. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. https://www.gaappeals.us/rules DEADLINES ARE NO LONGER TOLLED IN THIS C

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD Terrance Garcia Glenn ) Docket No. 2017-06-0584 )

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT No. 23-16147 ANTHONY T. DEFRANCESCO, D.C. No. Plaintiff-Appellant, 4:20-cv-00011- CKJ v. ROBERT C. ROBBINS, in his OPINION individual capacity; MICHAEL D. DAKE, in his individ

550 F.Supp.2d 1295 (2008) PENNSYLVANIA NATIONAL MUTUAL CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. ROBERTS BROTHERS, INC., et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 07-0085-WS-M. United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Southern Division. March 11, 2008. *1298 R. Larry Bradford, Bradford & Sears, P.C., Birmingham, AL, for Plainti

66 Ill. App.3d 664 (1978) 384 N.E.2d 91 ANTHONY C. CRISCIONE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SEARS, ROEBUCK AND COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. No. 78-469. Illinois Appellate Court — First District (5th Division). Opinion filed November 17, 1978. *665 Costello & Fee, of Chicago (Russell J. Fee, of counsel), for