Cases

NEWSOM, Circuit Judge: Ricky Hinkle died in the Birmingham City Jail after being shocked with a taser, twice. Hinkle's son, Nyreekis Hunter, brought suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging several claims on his behalf, including, as relevant here, (1) an excessive-force claim against Deputy Habimana Dukuzumuremyi an

PER CURIAM. We reverse the award of attorney’s fees and remand with direction that any award is to be for fees at the trial court level only, in light of our previous ruling upon the untimely motion for appellate attorney’s fees for the prior appeal. We denied that motion; the trial court therefore had no jurisdiction to award attorney's fees for that appeal. The trial court is further directed to cond

PER CURIAM. We reverse the trial court’s order of modification and remand with direction to restore primary residential responsibility of the mother. The record does not support the trial court’s bare assertion of a substantial change of circumstances. See Haines v. Haines, 417 So.2d 819, 820 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982). HERSEY, C.J., and LETTS and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., concur.

RODGERS, Senior Judge. Bonnie L. Piazza (Appellant) appeals from the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Washington County denying her motion for post-trial relief. We affirm. On January 21, 1996, Troy W. Piazza (decedent) was travelling northbound on State Route 980, when he lost control of his car, which traveled off the west berm of the roadway and down an embankment. As the vehicle traveled down the

In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana No. 06-18-00050-CV ANTHONY JOSEPH PIAZZA, JR., Appellant V. CAROLYN NEILL JENNINGS, Appellee On Appeal from the 123rd District Court Shelby County, Texas Trial Court No. 16CV33571 Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Moseley

NO. 12-18-00253-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS CAROLYN NEILL JENNINGS, § APPEAL FROM THE 123RD APPELLANT V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT ANTHONY JOSEPH PIAZZA, JR., APPELLEE §

SUMMARY ORDER Riccelli Enterprises, Inc. (“Riccelli”) appeals from the orders and judgment of the District Court (Sannes, J.) denying Riccel-li’s motion for an extension of the deadline for the production of documents, granting summary judgment in favor of Pennsylvania Manufacturers’ Association Insurance Company (“PMA”) on its breach of contract claims, and awarding PMA damages and prejudgment interest. We assume the parties’ familiari

[Cite as In re Resignation of Piazza, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2020-Ohio-3398.] IN RE RESIGNATION OF PIAZZA. [Cite as In re Resignation of Piazza, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2020-Ohio-3398.] Attorneys at law—Resignation with disciplinary action pending—Gov.Bar R. VI(11)(C). (No. 2020-0666—Submitted June 17, 2020—Decided June 22, 2020.) ON APPLICATION FOR RETIREMENT OR RESIGNATION PURSUANT TO GOV.BAR R. VI(11).

MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER DAVID N. HURD, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Rudolph A. Buckley (“Buckley” or “plaintiff’) initially filed this action in the Supreme Court, Oneida County, against his former employer, defendant Slocum-Dickson Medical Group (“Slocum-Dickson” or “defendant”) asserting, inter alia, a state law breach of contract claim and seek

509 F.Supp.2d 242 (2007) Patrick W. McALPIN, Plaintiff, v. RLI INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. No. 04-CV-6125L. United States District Court, W.D. New York. September 5, 2007. *243 *244 Anthony J. Piazza, Gary H. Abelson, Hiscock & Barclay LLP, Rochester, NY, for Plaintiff. Joseph D.

SUMMARY ORDER UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of the district court be and it hereby is AFFIRMED. Defendant-appellant Cincinnati Insurance Company (“Cincinnati”) appeals a February 21, 2006, judgment of the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York (Thomas J. McAvoy, Judge) granting summary judgment in favor of plaintiffs-appelle

MINORA, J, I. INTRODUCTION Currently before the court are potentially dipositive motions for summary judgment filed on behalf of defendants, SIT Controls USA Inc., Hearth-N-Home Technologies Inc., HON Industries Inc. and S&T Coombe Inc. Since the potentially case dispostive authority from the case of Burnish v. KWI Building Company, 602 Pa. 402, 980 A.2d 535 (2009) dealing with th

[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as Disciplinary Counsel v. Piazza, Slip Opinion No. 2020-Ohio-603.] NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any typograp

This appeal arises as a result of the judgment entered by the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas which affirmed the decision of the Unemployment *Page 355 Compensation Board of Review to deny unemployment benefits to the appellant, Robert W. Piazza ("appellant"). Appellant appeals two decisions of the board. Both have been consolidated by this court. The facts giving rise to this appeal as contained in the record provide: On September 19, 1986,

(2008) Geoffrey Willard ATWELL, Plaintiff v. Thomas LA VAN, et al., Defendants. Civil No. 1:CV-03-1728. United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania. March 26, 2008. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER SYLVIA H. RAMBO, District Judge. Before the court is a December 21, 2007 report and recommendation of the magistrate judge addressing the cross-mot

16 F.Supp.2d 569 (1998) James BURDEN, Sr. Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of James Burden, Jr., Plaintiff, v. WILKES-BARRE AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant. No. Civ.A. 3:97-CV-1224. United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania. February 11, 1998. *570 Chester F. Dudick, Forty-Fort, PA, for Plaintiff. Anth

*155OPINION OF THE COURT Rosenblatt, J. The appeal before us involves a suit by a policyholder against its insurance broker, contending that the broker did not obtain a policy that would have covered the loss involved. We hold that, as a matter of law, the policyholder did not establish that it made a specific request for the coverage in question or t

112 F.Supp.2d 369 (2000) NAP, INC., Plaintiff, v. SHUTTLETEX, INC., and the St. Paul Companies, Inc. as Successor-in-Interest to USF & G Corp., Defendants. No. 98 Civ. 7776(VM). United States District Court, S.D. New York. September 11, 2000. *370 Mark Walfish, Judith Shampanier, Esanu, Katsky, Korins & Siger, LLP, New Yo

362 F.Supp.2d 403 (2005) Mary BUCK, Individually and on Behalf of the Estate of David N. Buck, Sr., Plaintiff, v. HORSEHEADS INDUSTRIAL CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, II, LLC, as Successor in Interest to Horseheads Industrial Capital Management, LLC, et al., Defendants. No. 02-CV-6506L. United States District Court, W.D. New York. March 31, 2005. James B. Reed, Ziff, Weiermill

ALVIN B. RUBIN, Circuit Judge: A manufacturer and supplier of custom-designed automobile wheels seized merchandise and accessories in the possession of one of its distributors under a writ of sequestration. The distributor contends that it did not purchase the wheels and, therefore, does not owe the manufacturer for them.