Cases

35 F.3d 640 Marguerite DEBRUYNE; Peter Debruyne; Gayle Simms; JamesSimms; Madeline Bernice Strange; Robin A. Palley; TonyaMoore; Cathy Mercantini; Shirley Badon; James Badon;Karen Motchnik; Deborah Z. Zook; Thomas D. Zook; Linda E.Hughes; Arthur S. Hughes; Lorraine Nieves; MarylandJohnson Bush; Carol Jamieson; Carol Witzel; Edward S.Witzel; Eunice A. Chattman; Ronald W. Chattman; Pamela J.Holman; Te

264 F.3d 344 (3rd Cir. 2001) IN RE: ORTHOPEDIC BONE SCREW PRODUCT LIABILITY LITIGATION (MDL No. 1014)J.T. Bradley and Kathy W. Bradley, Appellants in No. 00-3899Regina M. Luellen and Eurston Luellen, Sr., Appellants in No. 00-3900Randal Jon Uribe, Appellant in No. 00-3901Mitchell H. Walker and Kim S. Walker, Appellants in No. 00-3902Jose Morfin, Appellant in No. 00-3903Mary K. Mullen Schmelter and Kurt Allen Schmelter, Appel

35 F.3d 637 In re REPETITIVE STRESS INJURY LITIGATION.Marguerite DEBRUYNE; Peter Debruyne; Gayle Simms; JamesSimms; Madeline Bernice Strange; Robin A. Palley; TonyaMoore; Cathy Mercantini; Shirley Badon; James Badon;Karen Motchnik; Deborah Z. Zook; Thomas D. Zook; Linda E.Hughes; Arthur S. Hughes; Lorraine Nieves; MarylandJohnson Bush; Carol Jamieson; Carol Witzel; Edward S.Witzel; Eunice A. Chattman;

11 F.3d 368 62 USLW 2391, 27 Fed.R.Serv.3d 1189 In re REPETITIVE STRESS INJURY LITIGATION.Marguerite DEBRUYNE; Peter Debruyne; Gayle Simms; JamesSimms; Madeline Bernice Strange; Robin A. Palley; TonyaMoore; Cathy Mercantini; Shirley Badon; James Badon;Karen Motchnik; Deborah Z. Zook; Thomas D. Zook; Linda E.Hughes; Arthur S. Hughes; Lorraine Nieves; MarylandJohnson Bush; Carol Jam

Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court

Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr

ACCEPTED 01-12-00578-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS

137 Nev., Advance Opinion 4, IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA TEVA PARENTERAL MEDICINES, No. 81024 INC., F/K/A SICOR, INC.; BAXTER HEALTHCARE CORPORATION; AND MCKESSON MEDICAL-SURGICAL, INC., Petitioners, FILED vs. THE EIGHT

WINTER, Circuit Judge: Defendants-appellants International Business Machines Corporation (“IBM”) and Wang Laboratories, Inc. (“Wang”) appeal from Judge Weinstein’s order (“Weinstein Order”), In re: Repetitive Stress Injury Cases, 142 F.R.D. 584 (E.D.N.Y.1992), granting the plaintiffs-appellees’ motion to consolidate the forty-four cases in the Eastern District of New York that assert a claim for damages for “

68 N.J. 179 (1975) 343 A.2d 721 ANTHONY SKULSKI, THEODORE PROCTOR, MICHAEL J. PRESTIA, FRANK J. MOORE, EDWARD T. BADGER, EDNA M. O'NEILL, RAFFAELA MIGLIOCCIO, MICHAEL BONELLI, JAMES DeFELIPPO, FLORENCE KISLER, AND ALMA E. BURKE, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. JOSEPH M. NOLAN, RECEIVER OF THE HUDSON COUNTY EMPLOYEES' PENSION COMMISSION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. HELEN WISNIEWSKI, JOHN H. FITZHENRY, JAMES P. CLARK, ADRIAN BRIED, JOSE

444 B.R. 585 (2011) In re MORTGAGES LTD., Debtor. Jeffrey C. Stone, Inc. d/b/a summit builders, an Arizona corporation, Plaintiff, v. Central and Monroe, L.L.C., an Arizona limited liability company; et al., Defendants. Summers Group, Inc. d/b/a Rexel Phoenix Electric, a corporation, Cross-Claimant/Counter-Claimant, v. Central and Monroe, L.L.C., an Arizona limited liability company; Cross-Defendants; and Jeffrey C. Stone, Inc

PER CURIAM: We assume familiarity with the factual and procedural background of this dispute as laid out in our previous decisions. In In re Repetitive Stress Injury Litig., 11 F.3d 368 (2d Cir.1993), we held that the district court abused its discretion by consolidating forty-four cases representing a wide range of both factual and legal contexts, and we granted mandamus relief sua sponte.

WINTER, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs-appellees petition for rehearing following our decision in In re Repetitive Stress Injury Litig., 11 F.3d 368 (2d Cir.1993). They argue that our sua sponte grant of a writ of mandamus deprived both them and the district court of an opportunity to oppose mandamus relief. Furthermore, petitioners claim that events in the underlying litigation subsequent to the filing of the a

2023 IL App (5th) 230035 NOTICE Decision filed 01/31/23. The text of this decision may be NO. 5-23-0035 changed or corrected prior to the filing of a Peti ion for Rehearing or the disposition of IN THE the same. APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIFTH DISTRICT _______________________________________________________________

BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judge: This is an appeal from criminal convictions following one of the lengthiest and costliest trials in this nation’s history. The trial lasted over 16 months, produced over 30,000 pages of transcripts, and involved over 250 witnesses and thousands of exhibits presenting evidence involving over 2,000 narcotics transactions spanning an 11-year period. Of the 24 defendants charged in the 44-count supersed

ORINDA D. EVANS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *1229Table of Contents I. The Case on Remand...1230 II. Preliminary Matters...1236 III. FAIR USE ANALYSIS FOR INDIVIDUAL INFRINGEMENT CLAIMS...1239 A. Professor Kaufmann...1239

OPINION OF THE COURT REAVLEY, Circuit Judge. This Federal Torts Claims Act (FTCA) claim against the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for granting clearance to market certain types of pedicle screw fixation devices (referred to generally as bone screws) was dismissed by the District Court pursuant to the discretionary function exception to the FTCA.1 Appellants contend here that

MEMORANDUM DECISION GRANTING PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF MORTGAGES LTD. RANDOLPH J. HAINES, Bankruptcy Judge. The issue here is whether various mechanics’ lien claimants, who claim priority dating from the commencement of construction in November 2006, have priority over a construction deed of trust that was recorded in May of 2007. Among other defenses, the construction lender asserts the doctri

ORDER ORINDA D. EVANS, District Judge. Table of Contents I. Case History............................................................1201 II. Eleventh Amendment Immunity and the Ex Parte Young Doctrine............1205 III. Copyright Infringement and the Fair Use Defense........................

ACCEPTED 07-14-00405-CV SEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS AMARILLO, TEXAS 2/18/2015 4:43:44 PM