⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Anthony Capasso, Jr”

Jenkins v. Capassopublic domain
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2003-02-05 · Published · cited 6× · 836 So. 2d 1286; 2003 WL 298997
836 So.2d 1286 (2003) Sheryl A. JENKINS v. Anthony T. CAPASSO, La Auto Insurance and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. Anthony T. Capasso v. Sheryl A. Jenkins. Nos. 2002-CA-0625, 2002-CA-0626. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit. February 5, 2003. Rehearing Denied February 28, 2003. Robert B. NcNEAL, Monica L. Lack
In re Jungpublic domain
New York Court of Appeals · 2008-10-28 · Published · cited 41× · 11 N.Y.3d 365; 899 N.E.2d 925
OPINION OF THE COURT Per Curiam. Petitioner, a Judge of the Family Court, Fulton County, com*367menced this proceeding to review a determination of the State Commission on Judicial Conduct that sustained five charges of misconduct against him and imposed the sanction of removal from judicial office. Upon our plenary review of the record, we accept t
New York Court of Appeals · 1990-02-22 · Published · cited 249× · 75 N.Y.2d 860; 552 N.Y.S.2d 918; 552 N.E.2d 166; 1990 N.Y. LEXIS 283
OPINION OF THE COURT Memorandum. The order of the Appellate Division, First Department, should be affirmed and the question certified, "Was the order of the Supreme Court, as affirmed by this Court, properly made?”, should be answered in the affirmative. The sole issue presented for our review is whether the trial court, as affirmed "on the law” by the Appellate Division, abused its discretion as a matter of law in de
New York Court of Appeals · 2007-10-23 · Published · cited 77× · 878 N.E.2d 966; 9 N.Y.3d 124; 848 N.Y.S.2d 551
9 N.Y.3d 124 (2007) 878 N.E.2d 966 848 N.Y.S.2d 551 CITY OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v. WELSBACH ELECTRIC CORP., Respondent, et al., Defendant. Court of Appeals of the State of New York. Argued September 6, 2007. Decided October 23, 2007. *125 Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel,
New York Court of Appeals · 2007-07-02 · Published · cited 34× · 874 N.E.2d 723; 9 N.Y.3d 47; 842 N.Y.S.2d 759
9 N.Y.3d 47 (2007) 874 N.E.2d 723 842 N.Y.S.2d 759 GLENFORD MORRIS, Appellant, v. PAVARINI CONSTRUCTION et al., Respondents. (And a Third-Party Action.) Court of Appeals of the State of New York. Argued June 6, 2007. Decided July 2, 2007. *48 Sacks and Sacks, LLP, New York Ci
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2010-03-23 · Published · cited 6× · 927 N.E.2d 794; 399 Ill. App. 3d 456
927 N.E.2d 794 (2010) MUELLER INDUSTRIES, INC., and B and K Industries, Inc., Plaintiffs and Counterdefendants-Appellees, v. Peter D. BERKMAN and Jeffrey A. Berkman, Defendants and Counterplaintiffs-Appellants (William O'Hagan, Greg Christopher, Robert Hodes, Nicholas Moss, Harvey L. Karp, Alexander P. Federbush, Gennaro J. Fulvio, Gary S. Gladstein, and Terry Hermanson, Counterdefendants-Appellees; Homewerks Worldwide LLC, Counterplaintiff).
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015-05-13 · Published · cited 6× · 786 F.3d 899; 114 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1749; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 7856; 2015 WL 2216261
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ AKAMAI TECHNOLOGIES, INC., THE MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, Plaintiffs-Appellants v. LIMELIGHT NETWORKS, INC., Defendant-Cross-Appellant ______________________ 2009-1372, 2009-1380, 2009-1416, 2009-1417 ______________________ Appeals from the Unite
Connecticut Appellate Court · 2020-06-09 · Published · cited 0× · 198 Conn. App. 1
*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1996-07-15 · Published · cited 23× · 933 F. Supp. 431; 26 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 21614; 43 ERC (BNA) 1853; 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11389; 1996 WL 450596
933 F.Supp. 431 (1996) GOULD INC., Plaintiff, v. A & M BATTERY & TIRE SERVICE, et al., Defendants. No. 3 CV-91-1714. United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania. July 15, 1996. *432 Dennis R. Suplee, Diana S. Donaldson, Schnader, Harrison, Segal & Lewis, Philadelphia, PA, Jacob P. Hart, Schnader, Harrison, Segal &
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1996-07-15 · Published · cited 0× · 933 F. Supp. 431
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER CONABOY, District Judge. Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Gould’s motion for partial summary judgment against certain defendants.1 Gould moves for partial summary judgment against the battery supplier defendants on the basis that each defendant arranged for the disposal or treatment of a hazardous substance at the site at which Marjol and Gou
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998-12-15 · Published · cited 62× · 162 F.3d 748
162 F.3d 748 Denice H. REIN, individually and as Executrix of the Estateof Mark Alan Rein, deceased, Barbara A. Ahern, individuallyand as Co-Administrator of the Estate of John M. Ahern,deceased, Thomas A. Ahern, individually and asCo-Administrator of the Estate of John M. Ahern, deceased,Marion K. Alderman, individually and as Administratrix ofthe Estate of Glenn John Bouckley, deceased, Marion K.Alderman, individually
Appellate Court of Illinois · 1989-08-15 · Published · cited 14× · 543 N.E.2d 293; 187 Ill. App. 3d 458; 135 Ill. Dec. 58; 1989 Ill. App. LEXIS 1226
187 Ill. App.3d 458 (1989) 543 N.E.2d 293 JOSEPH STEVENS, Adm'r of the Estate of Ingrid Stefanski, Deceased et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. LOU'S LEMON TREE, LTD., et al., Defendants-Appellees (Vernell Ayers, Jr., Defendant). Nos. 1-88-0963, 1-88-2206 cons. Illinois Appellate Court — First District (2nd Division). Opinion filed August 15, 1989.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982-06-04 · Published · cited 7× · 681 F.2d 127; 110 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2788; 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 18663
OAKES, Circuit Judge: Connecticut Distributors, Inc., seeks review of, and the National Labor Relations Board seeks to enforce, an order based on the company’s supposed violations of sections 8(a)(5) and (1) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 158(a)(5) and (1), in promising benefits to its employees, circulating disaf
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996-07-03 · Published · cited 110× · 88 F.3d 111; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 15951
88 F.3d 111 In re STATE POLICE LITIGATION.CONNECTICUT CRIMINAL DEFENSE LAWYERS ASSOCIATION, JosephKeefe, Individually and as President of Connecticut CriminalDefense Lawyers Association, John R. Gulash, William J.Sweeney, Denise Derby, Donald Couture, Timothy B. Young,Roderick Young, Barbara Schuyler, Conrad Seifert, Attorney,William Gerace, Attorney, Martin Minella, Attorney, WilliamDow, Jay Martin Sulzach, Attorney, Ro
Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1997-07-17 · Published · cited 50× · 695 A.2d 1381; 150 N.J. 209; 1997 N.J. LEXIS 214
150 N.J. 209 (1997) 695 A.2d 1381 NATIONAL WASTE RECYCLING, INC. AND JOHN GRYWALSKI, PLAINTIFFS, AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND DIVISION OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT SERVICES, INTERVENORS-APPELLANTS, v. THE MIDDLESEX COUNTY IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY AND WASTE MANAGEMENT OF NORTH JERSEY, INC., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. The Supreme Court of New Jersey. Argued February 18,
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977-01-26 · Published · cited 3× · 371 A.2d 365; 147 N.J. Super. 417
147 N.J. Super. 417 (1977) 371 A.2d 365 PETER A. LEONARDIS, MARY A. LEONARDIS, MARVIN L. RUBIN, JOYCE RUBIN, STANLEY GOLDBERG, KENNETH SCHEIHOFER, GARY W. PARIS, VIRGINIA PARIS, MYRNA LOPAT AND SHERMAN LOPAT, ON BEHALF OF THE TOWNSHIP OF UNION, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, IN THE COUNTY OF UNION, IN THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFFS, v. ROBERT BUNNELL, BUNNELL BROS., INC., ALTON VAN HORN, HENRY H. KAGEL, HUGO C. BIERTUEMPFEL
Strawn v. Canusopublic domain
Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1995-04-25 · Published · cited 94× · 657 A.2d 420; 140 N.J. 43; 41 A.L.R. 5th 859; 1995 N.J. LEXIS 54
140 N.J. 43 (1995) 657 A.2d 420 JOANNE STRAWN, GERALD L. STRAWN, TRACEY A. STRAWN AND BRANDON M. STRAWN, BY THEIR GUARDIAN AD LITEM JOANNE STRAWN, RUSSELL C. BURTON, AND BRETT C. BURTON, BY HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM RUSSELL C. BURTON, ANTHONY ALVAREZ, RITA ALVAREZ, LISA ALVAREZ, JOHN M. GAVEN, SR., ANNETTE M. GAVEN, AND JOHN M. GAVEN, JR., YOUNG D. KIM, JULIA S. KIM AND PATRICK KIM AND ROY KIM, BY THEIR GUARDIAN AD LITEM YOUNG D. KIM,
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1957-06-07 · Published · cited 0× · 163 F. Supp. 36; 1957 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2691
LA BUY, District Judge. The complaint in the above cause filed October 10, 1956, prays for the cancellation of a certificate of naturalization granted September 27, 1928, to Paul De Lucia for the reason that it was procured by concealment of material facts and by wilful misrepresentation. During the course of the trial the court reserved its ruling on defendant’s objections to the admissibility of several ex
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998-12-15 · Published · cited 1× · 162 F.3d 748; 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 31223; 1998 WL 865767
CALABRESI, Circuit Judge: Defendants-appellants, collectively “Libya,” appeal from the denial of their motion to dismiss. The plaintiffs, who are the survivors and representatives of persons killed aboard Pan Am 103 above Lockerbie, Scotland, brought suit against Libya alleging wrongful death, pain and suffering, and a variety of other injuries. Libya moved to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, contending that
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996-07-03 · Published · cited 1× · 88 F.3d 111
KEARSE, Circuit Judge: Defendants Lester J. Forst and other present and former officials of the Connecticut State Police (“State Police”) appeal from so much of an order of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut, T.F. Gilroy Daly, Judge, as denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing claims brought principally under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) and Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control