Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Anthony B. Payne and Denise R. Payne”
Payne v. General Motors Corp.public domain
731 F.Supp. 1465 (1990) Allen PAYNE, Plaintiff, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, Defendant. Civ. A. No. 88-2482-O. United States District Court, D. Kansas. February 14, 1990. *1466 *1467 Larry Delano Coleman, Kansas City, Mo., Denise L. Adams, Rosie M. Quinn & Associates, Kansas City, Kan.,
Corus Construction Venture, LLC v. Laketown Wharf Marketing Corp. (In Re Laketown Wharf Marketing, Corp.)public domain
433 B.R. 419 (2010) In re LAKETOWN WHARF MARKETING, CORPORATION, n/k/a Laketown Wharf Marketing, LLC, Debtor. Corus Construction Venture, LLC, Plaintiff, v. Laketown Wharf Marketing Corporation, et al., Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 08-40692-LMK. Adversary No. 09-04009-LMK. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Florida, Tallahassee Division. July 19, 2010.
United States v. McGregorpublic domain
*1283OPINION AND ORDER MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge. Following a nine-week trial and a week of deliberations, a jury returned 91 not-guilty verdicts and 33 unresolved counts in this complex public-corruption case. Two defendants — Robert B. Geddie, Jr. and Quinton T. Ross, Jr. — were acquitted entirely. The government has elected to retry the
Corus Construction Venture, LLC v. Laketown Wharf Marketing Corp. (In re Laketown Wharf Marketing Corp.)public domain
AMENDED ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT LEWIS M. KILLIAN, JR., Bankruptcy Judge. This matter is before the Court on Co-rus Construction Venture, LLC’s (CCV) Motion for Partial Summary Judgment which seeks a declaratory judgment that defendants Jonathan R. Adkins, et al. and defendants Peter Bell, et al. (collectively, the “Ori
State v. Orrpublic domain
*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr
People v. Letner and Tobinpublic domain
Opinion GEORGE, C. J. Defendants Richard Lacy Letner and Christopher Allan Tobin were convicted of first degree murder (Pen. Code, § 187),1 burglary (§ 459), robbery (§§ 211, 212.5), attempted rape (§§ 664, 261, subd. (a)(2)), and theft of an automobile (Veh. Code, § 10851, subd. (a)), arising from the murder of Ivon Pontbriant in her home in Visalia, California, on March 1, 1988. A
ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV
State ex rel. AutoZone Stores, Inc. v. Indus. Comm.public domain
[Cite as State ex rel. AutoZone Stores, Inc. v. Indus. Comm., 2023-Ohio-633.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT State of Ohio ex rel. Autozone Stores, Inc., : Relator, : v. : No. 21AP-294 Industrial Commission of Ohio et al., : (REGULAR
Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court
In Re: Alumina Refinery Toxic Dust Claimspublic domain
Published Opinions - Superior Court of the Virgin Islands Skip to Content
Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC2022-1050 ____________ PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHWEST AND CENTRAL FLORIDA, et al., Petitioners, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, et al., Respondents. ____________ No. SC2022-1127
State v. Fisherpublic domain
[Cite as State v. Fisher, 2024-Ohio-4484.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-appellee, : No. 113205 v. : DACEE FISHER, :
Household Bank v. JFS GROUPpublic domain
191 F.Supp.2d 1292 (2002) HOUSEHOLD BANK, f.s.b., Plaintiff, v. JFS GROUP, et al., Defendants, H & R Block, et al., Plaintiffs/Intervenors. No. CIV.A. 01A1405N. United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division. March 8, 2002. *1293 *1294 Stewart M. Cox, Andrew J. Noble, II
Scanlan v. Texas A&M Universitypublic domain
PRADO, Circuit Judge. The above numbered and styled appeals arise from six lawsuits filed in the Southern District of Texas by, and on behalf of, those injured and killed during the Texas A&M University bonfire disaster that occurred on November 18, 1999. The district court dismissed all of the plaintiffs’ claims and entered a final judgment in each lawsuit. The plaintiffs a
In Re Laketown Wharf Marketing Corp.public domain
433 B.R. 401 (2010) In re LAKETOWN WHARF MARKETING CORPORATION, n/k/a Laketown Wharf Marketing, LLC, Debtor. Corus Construction Venture, LLC, Plaintiff, v. Laketown Wharf Marketing Corporation, et al., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 08-40692-LMK. Adversary No. 09-4009-LMK. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Florida, Tallahassee Division. June 7, 2010.
Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr
State v. Whitepublic domain
362 S.W.3d 559 (2012) STATE of Tennessee v. Jason Lee WHITE. No. M2009-00941-SC-R11-CD. Supreme Court of Tennessee, at Nashville. November 1, 2011 Session. March 9, 2012. *561 Robert E. Cooper, Jr., Attorney General and Reporter; Gordon W. Smith and Joseph F. Whalen, Associate Solicitors General; Rachel E. Willis
State v. Juan J.public domain
July 5, 2022 CONNECTICUT LAW JOURNAL Page 45 CASES ARGUED AND DETERMINED IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. JUAN J.* (SC 20406) Robinson, C. J., and McDonald, D
ACCEPTED 15-25-00013-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 12:26 PM No. 15-25-00013-CV
ENTRY ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT TANYA WALTON PRATT, JUDGE This matter is before the Court on Defendant, Indianapolis-Marion County Forensics Services Agency’s (the “Agency”), Motion for Summary Judgment (Filing No. 55). Following termination of her employment as a forensic scientist for the Agency, Plaintiff Tami Atwell (“Ms. At-well”), filed a complaint alleging disability discriminat