Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Anthem Health Plans of Virginia, Inc. v. AGS Health, Inc.”
Estate of Spinner v. Anthem Health Plans of Va.public domain
(2008) ESTATE OF John Cecil SPINNER, Deceased, Plaintiff, v. ANTHEM HEALTH PLANS OF VIRGINIA, et al., Defendants. Civil No. 6:07CV00050. United States District Court, W.D. Virginia, Lynchburg Division. December 18, 2008. MEMORANDUM OPINION NORMAN K. MOON, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the Motion to Dismiss (docket
United States of America v. Anthem, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AMY BERMAN JACKSON, United States District Judge Anthem and Cigna, the nation’s second and third largest medical health insurance carriers, have agreed to merge. They propose to create the single largest seller of medical healthcare coverage to large commercial accounts, in a market in which there are only four national carriers still sta
In re Anthem, Inc. Data Breach Litigationpublic domain
*965ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART ANTHEM DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART NON-ANTHEM DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS Re: Dkt. No. 410, 413 LUCY H. KOH, United States District Judge Plaintiffs1 bring this putative class action against Anthem,
176 F.Supp.2d 1207 (2001) COVENTRY HEALTH CARE OF KANSAS, INC., Plaintiff, v. VIA CHRISTI HEALTH SYSTEM, INC., et al., Defendants. No. 01-1261-JTM. United States District Court, D. Kansas. December 19, 2001. *1208 *1209 *1210 Alan L. Rupe, Alisa A. Nickel,
IN RE: Sr. Health Ins. Co. of PA In Rehabilitationpublic domain
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN RE: Senior Health Insurance : Company of Pennsylvania : In Rehabilitation : No. 1 SHP 2020 RE: Application for Approval of the Plan of Rehabilitation for Senior Health Insurance Company of Pennsylvania BEFORE: HONORABLE MARY HANNAH LEAVITT, Judge FILED: August 24, 2021 OPINION AND ORDER
Attias v. Carefirst, Inc.public domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CHANTAL ATTIAS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 15-cv-882 (CRC) CAREFIRST, INC., et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER In April 2014, a cyberattack executed through an email spear phishing campaign gave hackers unauthorized
HealthOne of Denver, Inc. v. UnitedHealth Group Inc.public domain
*1159ORDER ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT WILEY Y. DANIEL, Chief Judge. I. INTRODUCTION THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Motion for Summary Judgment filed on January 6, 2012 by Defendant United-Health Group Incorporated [“Defendant” or “United Health”]. A response was filed on March 13, 2012, and a reply was file
United States of America v. Aetna Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION JOHN D. BATES, United States District Judge INTRODUCTION .. .8 BACKGROUND.. .9 I. The Parties and Proposed Merger... 9 II. Original Medicare and Medicare Advantage.. .11 III. The Public Exchanges... 16 IV. Procedural History...
United States v. Energy Solutions, Inc.public domain
OPINION ROBINSON, Senior District Judge I. INTRODUCTION The Department of Justice, Antitrust Division (the “government”), seeks to enjoin Rockwell Holdco, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary Energy Solutions, Inc. (“Energy Solutions”) from acquiring Andrews County Holding, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary Waste Control Specialists LLC (‘WCS,” and collectively with the other defend
Gerawan Farming, Inc. v. Agric. Labor Relations Bd.public domain
LEVY, J. *1140This case involves the intersection of two of the fundamental purposes of the Agricultural Labor Relations Act ( Labor Code, 1 § 1140 et seq.; the ALRA): one is the policy to provide agricultural workers with the right to choose in questions of labor representation through a secret ballot election process (§§ 1140.2, 1152, 115
Filed 5/30/18 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT GERAWAN FARMING, INC., F073720 Petitioner, (42 ALRB No. 1) v. OPINION AGRICULTURAL LA
Proceedings: (In Chambers) Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendants WellPoint, Inc., United HealthGroup, Inc., and Inge-nix, Inc.’s Motions to Dismiss PHILIP S. GUTIERREZ, District Judge. Wendy K. Hernandez, Deputy Clerk. Pending before the Court are Defendants WellPoint, Inc., UnitedHealth Group, Inc., and Ingenix, Inc.’s Motions to Dismiss the Corrected Third Consolidate
SD3, LLC v. Black & Decker Inc.public domain
ON REHEARING PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1746 SD3, LLC; SAWSTOP LLC, Plaintiffs – Appellants, v. BLACK & DECKER (U.S.) INC.; BLACK & DECKER CORPORATION; CHANG TYPE INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD.; DELTA POWER EQUIPMENT CORP.; HITACHI KOKI CO., LTD.; HITACHI KOKI USA LTD.; MAKITA CORPORATION; MAKITA U.
Merritt v. WellPoint, Inc.public domain
615 F.Supp.2d 440 (2009) E. Thomas MERRITT, III, Elizabeth W. Granger, and Townley Sheap, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. WELLPOINT, INC., d/b/a/ Anthem Health Plans of Virginia, Inc., and/or Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield, Defendant. Action No. 3:08-CV-272. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Richmond Division. January 16,
SD3, LLC v. Black & Decker (U.S.) Inc.public domain
AGEE, Circuit Judge: SD3, LLC and its subsidiary, SawStop, LLC (together, “SawStop”), contend that several major table-saw manufacturers conspired to boycott SawStop’s safety technology and corrupt a private safety-standard-setting process, all with the aim of keeping that technology off the market. Consequently, SawStop sued nearly two dozen saw manufacturers and affiliated entities, alleging that they violated § 1 of the She
POOLER, Circuit Judge: *107 This case provides us an occasion to clarify pleading standards under the Commodities Exchange Act ("CEA") and to differentiate those standards from the standard for pleading constitutional standing. Drawing on Commodities Future Trading Comm
Craig v. Fed Ex Ground Package System, Inc.public domain
722 F.Supp.2d 1033 (2010) In re FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC., Employment Practices Litigation. This Document Relates to: Carlene M. Craig, et al. v. Fed Ex Ground Package System, Inc., Civil No. 3:05-CV-530 RLM (KS). Cause No. 3:05-MD-527 RM. MDL No. 1700. United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, South Bend Division. June 28, 2010.
Birkhead v. St. Anne's-Belfield, Inc.public domain
384 F.Supp.2d 962 (2005) L. Douglas BIRKHEAD, Plaintiff, v. ST. ANNE'S-BELFIELD, INC., Defendant. No. CIV.A.3:04 CV 00092. United States District Court, W.D. Virginia, Charlottesville Division. April 18, 2005. Dexter Brock Green, Jones & Green, Charlottesville, VA, for Plaintiff. MEMORANDUM OPINION MOON, District Judge. This
Gill v. Nelnet Loan Services, Inc. (In Re Gill)public domain
326 B.R. 611 (2005) In re Herbert T. & Jean C. GILL, Debtors. Jean C. Gill, Plaintiff, v. Nelnet Loan Services, Inc., State of Colorado, Colorado Student Loan Program, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 04-74963-SCS, Adversary No. 04-7155-SCS. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia, Norfolk Division. June 21, 2005. *612
Clarabal v. Dep't of Educ. of Statepublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT BY POLLACK, J. "The language of a people is an inextricable part of the identity of that people. Therefore, a revitalization of a suppressed language goes hand in hand with a revitalization of a suppressed cultural and political identity." Shari Nakata, Language Suppression, Revitalization, and Native Hawaiian Identity , 2 Chap. Diversity & S