⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Annette Ulrich”

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004-08-16 · Published · cited 171× · 379 F.3d 802; 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 16739; 85 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,764; 94 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 353; 2004 WL 1811992
FISHER, Circuit Judge. Annette Thomas was the municipal court administrator for the City of Beaver-ton, Oregon. Her supervisor, Sandy Miller, placed her on extended probation after Thomas refused to pass over a subordinate employee, Susie Perry, for a promotion to senior court clerk in 2001 despite Miller’s initial insistence that Perry should not be promoted. Perry, an African
Mikulich v. Wrightpublic domain
Missouri Court of Appeals · 2002-09-24 · Published · cited 0× · 85 S.W.3d 117; 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 1917; 2002 WL 31107100
PAUL M. SPINDEN, Judge. This lawsuit involves a pyramid scheme, Women’s Empowerment Network, in which the circuit court ordered Phyllis Wright to pay $10,000 to Kraig and Sara Mikulich, $10,000 to DeLyne K. Knox, and $20,000 to Annette Willett. These amounts were double what these individuals had contributed to the pyramid scheme. The circuit court determined that Wright had induced or caused the Miku-liches, Knox, and Wille
Missouri Court of Appeals · 1999-01-12 · Published · cited 24× · 984 S.W.2d 205; 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 41; 1999 WL 8317
984 S.W.2d 205 (1999) Neal Henry HONDERICK, Appellant, v. Annette Kay HONDERICK now Annette Kay Gallet and Missouri Department of Social Services, Respondents. No. WD 55247. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. January 12, 1999. *207 Linda L. Sherman, Harrisonville, MO, Attorney for Appellant, Annette Kay Gallet, F
Dice v. Darlingpublic domain
Missouri Court of Appeals · 1998-08-18 · Published · cited 4× · 974 S.W.2d 641; 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 1523; 1998 WL 479512
974 S.W.2d 641 (1998) Randoe E. DICE and Sheila M. Dice, Appellants, v. Christopher DARLING, Respondent. No. WD 55222. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. August 18, 1998. *642 Jo Annette Jacobs, Marshall, for Appellants. Lawrence R. McClure, Marshall, for Respondent. Before SPINDEN, P.J., and ULRICH and ED
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990-01-08 · Published · cited 1× · 157 A.D.2d 646; 549 N.Y.S.2d 745; 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 240
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondents dated September 7, 1988, which, after hearing, found that the petitioners demonstrated untrustworthiness and incompetency and suspended their real estate licenses for three months, or in lieu thereof, imposed fines. Adjudged that the petition is granted, on the law, without costs or disbursements, to the extent that the determination of the amount of the f
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014-08-20 · Published · cited 1× · 151 So. 3d 2; 2014 WL 4086807; 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 12784
ON REHEARING BY ORDER OF THE COURT: We grant the motions for rehearing to the extent that we hereby clarify that our opinion did not reach the issue of attorney fees. See Ulrich v. Eaton Vance Distrib., Inc., 764 So.2d 731, 733 (Fla.2d DCA 2000). The motions are denied in all other respects.
Missouri Court of Appeals · 1994-10-21 · Published · cited 0× · 886 S.W.2d 662; 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1642; 1994 WL 580085
PER CURIAM. At issue in this case is the legality of the fiscal note summary attached to an initiative proposition, Proposition A concerning campaign finance disclosure, which will appear on the ballot in the November 8, 1994, general election. The trial court rewrote the fiscal note after concluding that the one prepared by the Oversight Division of the Committee on Legislative Research was not sufficient. The committee and i
DaVee v. Mathispublic domain
Missouri Court of Appeals · 1991-06-11 · Published · cited 13× · 812 S.W.2d 816; 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 836; 1991 WL 96391
812 S.W.2d 816 (1991) Annette R. DaVEE, Appellant, v. Captain Robert MATHIS, Daniel Mulloy, Sgt. Gary Chapman, Kathy Pierce, Sergeant Ivan Wicke, Calvin Hayden, Kent Willnauer, Michael Marshall, Vince Werkowitch, Charles Barnes, Carolyn Lewis, Janet Baker, Respondents. No. WD43090. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. June 11, 1991. Motion for Rehearing
109OAG32public domain
Maryland Attorney General Reports · 2024-05-10 · Published · cited 0×
32 [109 Op. Att’y ACCOUNTANTS UNAUTHORIZED PRACTICE OF LAW – BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP INFORMATION REPORTING – WHETHER ASSISTANCE BY A CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT WITH THE BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP INFORMATION REPORTING REQUIREMENT OF THE CORPORATE TRANSPARENCY ACT WOULD CONSTITUTE THE UNAUTHORIZED PRACTICE OF LAW May 8, 2024 Jan L. Williams, Ph.D., CPA Chair, State Board of Public Accountanc
Welder v. Wiggspublic domain
Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1990-06-13 · Published · cited 1× · 31 Ark. App. 163; 790 S.W.2d 913; 1990 Ark. App. LEXIS 388
George K. Cracraft, Judge. Nudie Mae Welder appeals from an order of the White County Chancery Court quieting title to parcels of land in favor of appellees James and Odissia Wiggs, Edwin and Lou Hubach, and Larry and Betty Taylor. We find no error and affirm. The forty-acre tract in issue, which is located in White County, was owned by Elijah Moore at the time of his death i
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2023-12-07 · Published · cited 1× · 251 N.E.3d 415; 2023 IL App (1st) 231459
2023 IL App (1st) 231459 SECOND DIVISION December 7, 2023 No. 1-23-1459 ______________________________________________________________________________ IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS F
Krueger v. Obertopublic domain
Appellate Court of Illinois · 1999-12-29 · Published · cited 0×
29 December 1999 Nos. 2--98--1611 & 2--98--1637 cons. _________________________________________________________________ IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS SECOND DISTRICT _________________________________________________________________ WILLI
Krueger v. Obertopublic domain
Appellate Court of Illinois · 1999-12-29 · Published · cited 45× · 724 N.E.2d 21; 309 Ill. App. 3d 358; 243 Ill. Dec. 712
724 N.E.2d 21 (1999) 309 Ill. App.3d 358 243 Ill.Dec. 712 William KRUEGER and Audrey Krueger; Terrence J. Brady and Debra R. Brady; Patrick Lubenow and Paula Lubenow; Michael McNamara and Beth McNamara; Ruth Prest; Jerry Quist and Danielle Quist; Kathleen Osmond and Walter Osmond, Jr., Kevin Gherlone and Kimberly Gherlone; Clifton Stewart; Roberta Bernard; Susan MacCauley; Pat Bell and George R. Bell, Jr.;
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012-11-13 · Published · cited 0×
Case: 10-15968 Date Filed: 11/13/2012 Page: 1 of 49 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 10-15968 ________________________
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012-11-13 · Published · cited 212× · 701 F.3d 334; 27 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 400; 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 23345; 2012 WL 5477523
MARCUS, Circuit Judge: In this appeal, Susan and James Liese, the plaintiffs, challenge the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the defendant, Indian River Memorial Hospital, Inc. (“IRMH” or the “Hospital”). The Lieses, who both suffer from severe hearing impairment, brought this suit against IRMH under § 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (the “RA” o
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1922-02-13 · Published · cited 4× · 278 F. 694; 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 2860
MORROW, Circuit Judge. Buntaro Kaneda, the appellant, a citizen and subject of the empire of Japan, aged 22 years, arrived at the port of Honolulu, Hawaii, on the 5th day of October, 1919, as a first-class passenger on the steamship Korea Maru. He had been provided with a passport by the Japanese authorities, with which he applied for admission to the United States, stating to the board of special inquiry in the Immigration Serv
Maryland Attorney General Reports · 2024-05-08 · Published · cited 0×
32 [109 Op. Att’y ACCOUNTANTS UNAUTHORIZED PRACTICE OF LAW – BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP INFORMATION REPORTING – WHETHER ASSISTANCE BY A CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT WITH THE BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP INFORMATION REPORTING REQUIREMENT OF THE CORPORATE TRANSPARENCY ACT WOULD CONSTITUTE THE UNAUTHORIZED PRACTICE OF LAW May 8, 2024 Dr. Jan L. Williams Chair, State Board of Public Accountancy Chris
Nevada Supreme Court · 1976-01-23 · Published · cited 11× · 92 Nev. 24; 544 P.2d 1204; 1976 Nev. LEXIS 506
*25OPINION By the Court, Batjer, J.: Myers Realty, Inc., plaintiff below and respondent on appeal, brought an action against Nevada Wholesale Lumber Company (hereinafter referred to as Lumber Company), appellant, and Title Insurance and Trust Company to compel the latter as trustee to release and reconvey Lumber Company’s interest in lan
Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2025-07-02 · Published · cited 4× · 2025 WI 32
2025 WI 32 JOSH KAUL, et al., Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. JOEL URMANSKI, et al., Defendant-Appellant. No. 2023AP2362 Decided July 2, 2025 APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the Dane County Circuit Court (Diane Schlipper, J.), No. 2022CV15
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2021-11-04 · Published · cited 0×
Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court