Cases

JUSTICE STOUDER delivered the opinion of the court: The petitioner, Cheryl A. Eller, appeals from the trial court’s order denying her continued rehabilitative maintenance. We reverse the decision and remand the cause for proceedings consistent with this opinion. The record shows that Cheryl and the respondent, Walter A. Eller, were divorced in 1

FAIR, J., for the Court: ¶ 1. Our supreme court has held that parties generally may only appeal from a final judgment. M.W.F. v. D.D.F., 926 So.2d 897, 899 (¶ 4) (Miss.2006). “A final, appealable[ ] judgment is one that ‘adjudicates the merits of the controversy which settles all issues as to all the parties’ and requires no further action by the [trial] court.” Walters v. Walters, 956 So.2d

GREMILLION, Judge. |!Defendant, Calvin Charles Barfield, was convicted of simple escape, in violation of La.R.S. 14:110, and was initially ordered to serve four years at hard labor, with the first two years to be served without benefit of probation, parole, and suspension of sentence. Prior to the conclusion of the hearing, however, the prosecution filed a habitual offender bill charging Defendant as a fourth felony offender.<

CONLEY, District Judge. In 2014, following investigations by the Indiana Attorney General and FBI, a grand jury issued a four-count indictment for Medicaid fraud against defendants Wanda Shorter and her company, Empowerment Non-Emergency Medical Transport, Inc. (“Empowerment”). Specifically, Shorter and Empowerment were charged with one count

OPINION BY Judge ROBERT SIMPSON. This is a Right-to-Know Law (RTKL)1 appeal from a final determination of the Office of Open Records (OOR) that denied access to certain information under the attorney-client privilege and the work-product doctrine. Ryan Bagwell (Requester) sought records from the Department of Education (Department) regarding correspondence sent to the Secretary of

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-03-00191-CR NO. 03-03-00192-CR Larry Ralph Elliott, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIA

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-03-00191-CR NO. 03-03-00192-CR Larry Ralph Elliott, Appellant</

79 Ill. App.3d 1146 (1979) 399 N.E.2d 252 GRINNELL MUTUAL REINSURANCE COMPANY, a Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ANNETTE FRIERDICH et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 78-553. Illinois Appellate Court — Fifth District. Opinion filed December 27, 1979. Cornelius Thomas Ducey, Jr., of Ducey & Feder, Ltd., of Belleville, for appellant.

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-03-00191-CR NO. 03-03-00192-CR Larry Ralph Elliott, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, 277TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 02-256-K277 & 02-257-K277, HONORABLE KEN ANDERSON, JUDGE P

191 F.Supp.2d 1292 (2002) HOUSEHOLD BANK, f.s.b., Plaintiff, v. JFS GROUP, et al., Defendants, H & R Block, et al., Plaintiffs/Intervenors. No. CIV.A. 01A1405N. United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division. March 8, 2002. *1293 *1294 Stewart M. Cox, Andrew J. Noble, II

822 S.W.2d 933 (1991) STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Carl Douglas MACKEY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 57831. Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three. December 17, 1991. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer Denied January 14, 1992. Application to Transfer Denied February 25, 1992.

MEMORANDUM OPINION JOHN F. GRADY, District Judge. Before the court are several motions: (1) plaintiffs’ motion for class certification; (2) defendants’ motion to strike the impact analyses in plaintiffs expert’s declarations; (3) the motion of defendant University of Chicago Hospitals (“UCH”) to strike the testimony of plaintiffs’ expert, as applied to UCH’s nurses; and (4) plaintiffs’ motion t

264 F.3d 344 (3rd Cir. 2001) IN RE: ORTHOPEDIC BONE SCREW PRODUCT LIABILITY LITIGATION (MDL No. 1014)J.T. Bradley and Kathy W. Bradley, Appellants in No. 00-3899Regina M. Luellen and Eurston Luellen, Sr., Appellants in No. 00-3900Randal Jon Uribe, Appellant in No. 00-3901Mitchell H. Walker and Kim S. Walker, Appellants in No. 00-3902Jose Morfin, Appellant in No. 00-3903Mary K. Mullen Schmelter and Kurt Allen Schmelter, Appel

414 F.Supp. 1235 (1975) AETNA CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY et al., Plaintiffs, v. Donald AHRENS et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 74-H-1288. United States District Court, S. D. Texas, Houston Division. January 2, 1975. Supplemental Memorandum and Order May 6, 1976. *1236 *1237 Ja

611 P.2d 31 (1980) Chin HILBERS (aka Susie Hilbers) dba Aloha Massage and New Toyko Massage, Jan Augenstein Meyer dba Touch `N' Glow Massage and Gold Dust Modeling Studio, Tae Yon Greening dba Anna's Massage, Penny Hazen dba The Body Shop, Il Kum Belt dba U & I Massage, Chong Suk Woodward dba Glass Slipper, Juanita Cration dba K's Massage, Yi Ki Sum dba Shanghai Massage, Cornell Walker dba Fantasia Massage, Dwight Sherwood dba Ruby's Massage, Chung S

57 N.J. Super. 53 (1959) 153 A.2d 854 THE NATIONAL STATE BANK OF NEWARK, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS AND CROSS-APPELLANTS, v. LUCILLE NADEAU, NOW KNOWN AS LUCILLE BENNETT, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS AND CROSS-RESPONDENTS. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued April 13, 1959. Decided July 23, 1959.

833 P.2d 486 (1992) Marvin Jay BOUWKAMP, II, Appellant (Defendant), v. STATE of Wyoming, Appellee (Plaintiff). No. 90-57. Supreme Court of Wyoming. June 2, 1992. *487 Public Defender Program: Leonard D. Munker, State Public Defender, Steven E. Weerts, Sr. Asst. Public Defender, David Gosar, Appellate Counsel, Cheyenne, for appell

OPINION OF THE COURT REAVLEY, Circuit Judge. This Federal Torts Claims Act (FTCA) claim against the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for granting clearance to market certain types of pedicle screw fixation devices (referred to generally as bone screws) was dismissed by the District Court pursuant to the discretionary function exception to the FTCA.1 Appellants contend here that