⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Annette Madison”

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002-07-09 · Published · cited 1× · 295 F.3d 280
CALABRESI, Circuit Judge. Petitioners-Appellants, who are limited partners of Madison Recycling Associates (“Madison”), a limited partnership organized under the laws of the State of New York, appeal from judgments of the Tax Court sustaining adjustments sought by the Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service (the “Commissioner” or the “IRS”) to Madison’s 1982 partnership return and holding them liable for taxes. The prin
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1996-06-27 · Published · cited 9× · 551 N.W.2d 596; 203 Wis. 2d 261; 1996 Wisc. App. LEXIS 854
203 Wis.2d 261 (1996) 551 N.W.2d 596 Annette D. CARY and Daniel D. Cary, Victoria S. Alvarez and Alexander Z. Gonzalez, Plaintiffs-Appellants, UNIFORM SERVICES BENEFIT PLANS, INC., Adminastar Defense Services, Inc. and Monumental General Insurance Corporation, Subrogated-Plaintiffs, v. The CITY OF MADISON and Wisconsin Municipal Mutual Insurance Company, Defendants-Respondents. No. 95-3559.
South Dakota Supreme Court · 2020-03-18 · Published · cited 1× · 941 N.W.2d 223; 2020 S.D. 13
#29075-r-SRJ 2020 S.D. 13 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA **** CHRISTINA LAPLANTE, Claimant and Appellant, v. GGNSC MADISON, SOUTH DAKOTA, LLC d/b/a GOLDEN LIVING CENTER – MADISON and INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, Employer, Insurer and Appellees.
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2018-10-24 · Published · cited 0×
10/24/2018 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON September 13, 2018 Session RONALD DANA HARPER v. ANNETTE CARROL HARPER Appeal from the Chancery Court for Madison County No. 73947 James F. Butler, Chancellor ___________________________________
Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2017-06-22 · Published · cited 27× · 376 Wis. 2d 35; 2017 WI 65; 897 N.W.2d 16; 2017 Wisc. LEXIS 384
¶ 1. ANNETTE KINGSLAND ZIEGLER, J. This is a review of an unpublished decision of the court of appeals, Benson v. City of Madison, No. 2015AP2366, unpublished slip op. (Wis. Ct. App. Aug. 25, 2016), which affirmed the Dane County circuit court's1 judgment dismissing a lawsuit filed by the petitioners against the City of Madison ("the City") pursuant to the Wisconsin Fair Dealersh
Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2022-07-08 · Published · cited 25× · 976 N.W.2d 584; 403 Wis. 2d 369; 2022 WI 65
2022 WI 65 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2020AP1032 COMPLETE TITLE: John Doe 1, Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 3 and Jane Doe 4, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Petitioners, John Doe 5 and Jane Doe 5, Plaintiffs-Appellants, John Doe 6, Jane Doe 6, John Doe
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1980-06-05 · Published · cited 13× · 103 Misc. 2d 996; 431 N.Y.S.2d 251; 1980 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2238
OPINION OF THE COURT Per Curiam. Final judgment entered December 26, 1979 (Nason, J.) modified to the extent of reversing so much thereof as dismissed tenant’s counterclaim for legal fees; the tenant’s counterclaim for legal fees is reinstated, judgment upon the issue of liability upon the counterclaim is awarded in favor of the tenant, and the matter is remitted to the court below for an asses
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2010-03-31 · Published · cited 3× · 325 S.W.3d 603; 2010 Tenn. App. LEXIS 238; 2010 WL 1240682
325 S.W.3d 603 (2010) William MITCHELL v. MADISON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and the Madison County Civil Service Commission for Madison County Sheriff's Department. No. W2009-00099-COA-R3-CV. Court of Appeals of Tennessee, Western Section, at Jackson. October 28, 2009 Session. March 31, 2010. Petition to Rehear Denied April 26, 2010.
Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2008-07-09 · Published · cited 0× · 2008 WI 83; 752 N.W.2d 260; 311 Wis. 2d 402; 2008 Wisc. LEXIS 333
PATIENCE DRAKE ROGGENSACK, J. ¶ 47. (dissenting). I agree with the lead opinion that this case turns on the interpretation of the statutory phrase, "bridge on a highway maintainable by the town," found *428in Wis. Stat. § 81.38(1),1 now Wis. Stat. § 82.08(1).2 However, the lead opinion concludes that a highw
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2018-06-27 · Published · cited 1× · 588 B.R. 50
Hon. Catherine J. Furay, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Debtor Cranberry Growers Cooperative ("CranGrow") filed a chapter 11 petition on September 25, 2017 ("Petition Date"). Maxwell Foods ("Maxwell") filed a Motion to Approve Recoupment or to Exercise Right of Setoff. CranGrow has moved for Summary Judgment on Maxwell's Motion. FACTS On February 24, 2017, CranGrow and Maxwell Foods entered i
Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco) · 2014-10-09 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-13-00392-CV STUART FETTER, Appellant v. MARSHALL BROWN, ALLISON MADISON AND LAUREN WILSON, Appellees From the 414th District Court McLennan County, Texas Trial Court No. 2
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1997-12-02 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE WESTERN SECTION AT JACKSON ANNETTE DUBOSE, ) ) Plaintiff/Appellant, ) Madison Circuit No. C-94-321 VS. ) ) Appeal No. 02A01-9705-CV-00096 FILED ) D
Tatera v. FMC Corp.public domain
Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2010-07-20 · Published · cited 79× · 2010 WI 90; 786 N.W.2d 810; 328 Wis. 2d 320; 2010 Wisc. LEXIS 170
786 N.W.2d 810 (2010) 2010 WI 90 Walter TATERA, deceased and Vicki Tatera, individually and as Special Administrator of the Estate of Walter Tatera, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. FMC CORPORATION, Defendant-Respondent-Petitioner, United Healthcare and American Medical Security, Subrogated Defendants, Kelsey-Hayes Company p/k/a K H Corporation, Defendant. No. 2008AP170. Suprem
Kielhurn v. Rossipublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002-10-16 · Published · cited 0× · 48 F. App'x 359
SUMMARY ORDER UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the decision of said district court be and it hereby is AFFIRMED in part, VACATED in part, and REMANDED with instructions. Defendant-appellant Claudia Giammarinaro, pro se, appeals from the Judgement entered May 2, 2001 in United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Arthur D. Spatt, Judge) following a jury t
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2018-09-21 · Published · cited 1× · 592 B.R. 325
Hon. Catherine J. Furay, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Debtor Cranberry Growers Cooperative ("Debtor" or "CranGrow") filed for relief under Chapter 11. The United States Trustee ("UST") claims additional quarterly fees are due. CranGrow objects to the Administrative Claim of the Office of the United States Trustee. The UST opposes Debtor's Objection. The parties submitted an extensive stipulation of facts and agreed no evidentiary hearing w
Konneker v. Romanopublic domain
Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2010-07-07 · Published · cited 37× · 2010 WI 65; 785 N.W.2d 432; 326 Wis. 2d 268; 2010 Wisc. LEXIS 57
785 N.W.2d 432 (2010) 2010 WI 65 Robert D. KONNEKER and Ann M. Konneker, Plaintiffs-Respondents-Petitioners, v. Robert S. ROMANO and Francis A. Romano, Defendants-Appellants, Norman E. Nelson and Lawrence A. Nelson, Defendants. No. 2008AP1546. Supreme Court of Wisconsin. Argued February 11, 2010. Decided July 7, 2010.
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2026-06-30 · Published · cited 0× · 2026 Ohio 2477
[Cite as Ragouzis v. Madison House Condominium Owners Assn., Inc., 2026-Ohio-2477.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO EDGAR T. RAGOUZIS, : APPEAL NO. C-250333 TRIAL NO. A-2204283 Plaintiff-Counterclaim-Defendant- : Appellant, : and
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2017-08-30 · Published · cited 0×
MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be FILED regarded as precedent or cited before any Aug 30 2017, 5:22 am court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK the defense of res judicata, collateral Indiana Supreme Court Court
District Court, E.D. New York · 2001-04-27 · Published · cited 1× · 148 F. Supp. 2d 219; 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5379; 2001 WL 459731
148 F.Supp.2d 219 (2001) Annette KIELHURN, Plaintiff, v. Claudia GIAMMARINARO and Beverly Rossi, Defendants. No. CV 98-6789 ADS. United States District Court, E.D. New York. April 27, 2001. *220 *221 Annette Kielhurn, Madison, CT, Pro Se. Katich, Werse & Petillo, Fair Haven, NJ, By
Goble v. Astruepublic domain
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2009-05-22 · Published · cited 0× · 620 F. Supp. 2d 948; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44669; 2009 WL 1437526
620 F.Supp.2d 948 (2009) Annette GOBLE, Plaintiff, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. No. 08-cv-529-bbc. United States District Court, W.D. Wisconsin. May 22, 2009. *951 Frederick J. Daley, Daley, Debofsky & Bryant, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff. Richard D. Humphrey, U.S. Attorney's Office,