Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Annette Madison”
Madison Recycling Associates v. Commissionerpublic domain
CALABRESI, Circuit Judge. Petitioners-Appellants, who are limited partners of Madison Recycling Associates (“Madison”), a limited partnership organized under the laws of the State of New York, appeal from judgments of the Tax Court sustaining adjustments sought by the Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service (the “Commissioner” or the “IRS”) to Madison’s 1982 partnership return and holding them liable for taxes. The prin
Cary v. City of Madisonpublic domain
203 Wis.2d 261 (1996) 551 N.W.2d 596 Annette D. CARY and Daniel D. Cary, Victoria S. Alvarez and Alexander Z. Gonzalez, Plaintiffs-Appellants, UNIFORM SERVICES BENEFIT PLANS, INC., Adminastar Defense Services, Inc. and Monumental General Insurance Corporation, Subrogated-Plaintiffs, v. The CITY OF MADISON and Wisconsin Municipal Mutual Insurance Company, Defendants-Respondents. No. 95-3559.
Laplante v. Ggnsc Madisonpublic domain
#29075-r-SRJ 2020 S.D. 13 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA **** CHRISTINA LAPLANTE, Claimant and Appellant, v. GGNSC MADISON, SOUTH DAKOTA, LLC d/b/a GOLDEN LIVING CENTER – MADISON and INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, Employer, Insurer and Appellees.
Ronald Dana Harper v. Annette Carrol Harperpublic domain
10/24/2018 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON September 13, 2018 Session RONALD DANA HARPER v. ANNETTE CARROL HARPER Appeal from the Chancery Court for Madison County No. 73947 James F. Butler, Chancellor ___________________________________
Thomas F. Benson v. City of Madisonpublic domain
¶ 1. ANNETTE KINGSLAND ZIEGLER, J. This is a review of an unpublished decision of the court of appeals, Benson v. City of Madison, No. 2015AP2366, unpublished slip op. (Wis. Ct. App. Aug. 25, 2016), which affirmed the Dane County circuit court's1 judgment dismissing a lawsuit filed by the petitioners against the City of Madison ("the City") pursuant to the Wisconsin Fair Dealersh
John Doe 1 v. Madison Metro School Districtpublic domain
2022 WI 65 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2020AP1032 COMPLETE TITLE: John Doe 1, Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 3 and Jane Doe 4, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Petitioners, John Doe 5 and Jane Doe 5, Plaintiffs-Appellants, John Doe 6, Jane Doe 6, John Doe
N. V. Madison, Inc. v. Saurweinpublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT Per Curiam. Final judgment entered December 26, 1979 (Nason, J.) modified to the extent of reversing so much thereof as dismissed tenant’s counterclaim for legal fees; the tenant’s counterclaim for legal fees is reinstated, judgment upon the issue of liability upon the counterclaim is awarded in favor of the tenant, and the matter is remitted to the court below for an asses
Mitchell v. Madison County Sheriff's Departmentpublic domain
325 S.W.3d 603 (2010) William MITCHELL v. MADISON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and the Madison County Civil Service Commission for Madison County Sheriff's Department. No. W2009-00099-COA-R3-CV. Court of Appeals of Tennessee, Western Section, at Jackson. October 28, 2009 Session. March 31, 2010. Petition to Rehear Denied April 26, 2010.
Town of Madison v. County of Danepublic domain
PATIENCE DRAKE ROGGENSACK, J. ¶ 47. (dissenting). I agree with the lead opinion that this case turns on the interpretation of the statutory phrase, "bridge on a highway maintainable by the town," found *428in Wis. Stat. § 81.38(1),1 now Wis. Stat. § 82.08(1).2 However, the lead opinion concludes that a highw
In re Cranberry Growers Coop.public domain
Hon. Catherine J. Furay, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Debtor Cranberry Growers Cooperative ("CranGrow") filed a chapter 11 petition on September 25, 2017 ("Petition Date"). Maxwell Foods ("Maxwell") filed a Motion to Approve Recoupment or to Exercise Right of Setoff. CranGrow has moved for Summary Judgment on Maxwell's Motion. FACTS On February 24, 2017, CranGrow and Maxwell Foods entered i
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-13-00392-CV STUART FETTER, Appellant v. MARSHALL BROWN, ALLISON MADISON AND LAUREN WILSON, Appellees From the 414th District Court McLennan County, Texas Trial Court No. 2
Annette Dubose v. Debbie Rameypublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE WESTERN SECTION AT JACKSON ANNETTE DUBOSE, ) ) Plaintiff/Appellant, ) Madison Circuit No. C-94-321 VS. ) ) Appeal No. 02A01-9705-CV-00096 FILED ) D
Tatera v. FMC Corp.public domain
786 N.W.2d 810 (2010) 2010 WI 90 Walter TATERA, deceased and Vicki Tatera, individually and as Special Administrator of the Estate of Walter Tatera, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. FMC CORPORATION, Defendant-Respondent-Petitioner, United Healthcare and American Medical Security, Subrogated Defendants, Kelsey-Hayes Company p/k/a K H Corporation, Defendant. No. 2008AP170. Suprem
Kielhurn v. Rossipublic domain
SUMMARY ORDER UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the decision of said district court be and it hereby is AFFIRMED in part, VACATED in part, and REMANDED with instructions. Defendant-appellant Claudia Giammarinaro, pro se, appeals from the Judgement entered May 2, 2001 in United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Arthur D. Spatt, Judge) following a jury t
In re Cranberry Growers Coop.public domain
Hon. Catherine J. Furay, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Debtor Cranberry Growers Cooperative ("Debtor" or "CranGrow") filed for relief under Chapter 11. The United States Trustee ("UST") claims additional quarterly fees are due. CranGrow objects to the Administrative Claim of the Office of the United States Trustee. The UST opposes Debtor's Objection. The parties submitted an extensive stipulation of facts and agreed no evidentiary hearing w
Konneker v. Romanopublic domain
785 N.W.2d 432 (2010) 2010 WI 65 Robert D. KONNEKER and Ann M. Konneker, Plaintiffs-Respondents-Petitioners, v. Robert S. ROMANO and Francis A. Romano, Defendants-Appellants, Norman E. Nelson and Lawrence A. Nelson, Defendants. No. 2008AP1546. Supreme Court of Wisconsin. Argued February 11, 2010. Decided July 7, 2010.
[Cite as Ragouzis v. Madison House Condominium Owners Assn., Inc., 2026-Ohio-2477.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO EDGAR T. RAGOUZIS, : APPEAL NO. C-250333 TRIAL NO. A-2204283 Plaintiff-Counterclaim-Defendant- : Appellant, : and
MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be FILED regarded as precedent or cited before any Aug 30 2017, 5:22 am court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK the defense of res judicata, collateral Indiana Supreme Court Court
Kielhurn v. Giammarinaropublic domain
148 F.Supp.2d 219 (2001) Annette KIELHURN, Plaintiff, v. Claudia GIAMMARINARO and Beverly Rossi, Defendants. No. CV 98-6789 ADS. United States District Court, E.D. New York. April 27, 2001. *220 *221 Annette Kielhurn, Madison, CT, Pro Se. Katich, Werse & Petillo, Fair Haven, NJ, By
Goble v. Astruepublic domain
620 F.Supp.2d 948 (2009) Annette GOBLE, Plaintiff, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. No. 08-cv-529-bbc. United States District Court, W.D. Wisconsin. May 22, 2009. *951 Frederick J. Daley, Daley, Debofsky & Bryant, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff. Richard D. Humphrey, U.S. Attorney's Office,