⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Annette D Stone”

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011-12-14 · Published · cited 0× · 454 F. App'x 140
*141OPINION OF THE COURT HARDIMAN, Circuit Judge. Petitioner D.C.A.G., a native and citizen of Jamaica, appeals a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) that: (1) upheld the Immigration Judge’s (IJ’s) determination that D.C.A.G.’s asylum application was untimely and not subject to an exception under 8 U.S.C. § 1158(a)(2)(D); (2) did not di
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2020-07-14 · Published · cited 0×
FILED Jul 14 2020, 8:19 am CLERK Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals
District Court, D. Hawaii · 1990-09-28 · Published · cited 11× · 748 F. Supp. 749; 21 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20383; 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13261; 1990 WL 146945
748 F.Supp. 749 (1990) GREENPEACE USA, a California non-profit corporation; Stichting Greenpeace Council, sometimes known as Greenpeace International, a not-for-profit stichting incorporated in the Netherlands; Institute For the Advancement of Hawaiian Affairs, a Hawaii non-profit corporation; World Council of Indigenous Peoples — Hawaii, a Hawaii non-profit corporation; and Walter Keli Iokekai Paulo, an individual, Plaintiffs, v. Michael P. STON
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017-01-04 · Published · cited 0× · 672 F. App'x 284
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Alfred L. Stone appeals the district court’s order granting defendants’ Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) motions to dismiss his complaint for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Stone v. Baltimore Washington Hotel, Inc., No. 1
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978-03-09 · Published · cited 10× · 572 F.2d 397; 1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 12233
GURFEIN, Circuit Judge: In this consolidated appeal, defendant Annette Boney appeals from judgments of conviction entered on August 18, 1977 and September 29, 1977 after jury trials in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Mishler, Chief Judge). At the first trial, appellant was f
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2022-06-14 · Published · cited 0×
SECOND DIVISION RICKMAN, C. J., MILLER, P. J., PIPKIN, J. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. https://www.gaappeals.us/rules J
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2025-07-16 · Published · cited 0×
Judgment rendered July 16, 2025. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 922, La. C. Cr. P. No. 56,312-KA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA ***** STATE OF LOUISIANA
District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2014-02-12 · Published · cited 0× · 996 F. Supp. 2d 490; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18401; 2014 WL 580764
ORDER AND REASONS KAREN WELLS ROBY, United States Magistrate Judge. Before the Court is Defendant, the Louisiana Attorney General of the State of Louisiana, through its Department of Revenue’s (“Department”) Motion to Dismiss, Alternatively, Motion for Summary Judgment (R. Doc. 30) of Plaintiff, Joanne Stone’s (“Stone”)1 complaint. The Motion
Stone v. Acuitypublic domain
Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2008-04-11 · Published · cited 12× · 2008 WI 30; 747 N.W.2d 149; 308 Wis. 2d 558; 2008 Wisc. LEXIS 174
ANN WALSH BRADLEY, J. ¶ 1. The petitioner, Acuity, seeks review of a published court of appeals decision affirming orders of the circuit court for Milwaukee County that denied Acuity's motions for summary judgment and reconsideration and that awarded G. Vaughn Stone and Christine Stone $500,000 pursuant to the parties' stipulation.1 Acuity contends that the court of appeals erred in its conclusions (1
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1978-02-03 · Published · cited 7× · 444 F. Supp. 1254; 1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19753
444 F.Supp. 1254 (1978) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Douglas Mark STONE, Pearl Marie Stone, Robert Douglas Stone, Michael Noel Stone, Joseph Garry Stone, Douglas James Stone, Clifford Clair Benjamin, Jr. and Marie Annette Benjamin (nee Stone), Defendants. No. 77-Cr-192. United States District Court, E. D. Wisconsin. February 3, 1978.
United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2012-03-14 · Published · cited 0×
FILED MAR 14 2012 1 ORDERED PUBLISHED SUSAN M SPRAUL, CLERK 2 U.S. BKCY. APP. PANEL O F TH E N IN TH C IR C U IT 3 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL 4
Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana) · 2004-04-29 · Published · cited 0×
In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana ______________________________ No. 06-03-00151-CR ___________________
Court of Appeals of Utah · 2014-03-20 · Published · cited 2× · 322 P.3d 1180; 2014 UT App 62; 756 Utah Adv. Rep. 30; 2014 WL 1096474; 2014 Utah App. LEXIS 59
Opinion on Rehearing2 DAVIS, Judge: ¶ 1 We previously addressed this case in Paget v. Department of Transportation, 2013 UT App 161, 2013 WL 3226212. There, we affirmed the trial court’s determination that the Pagets’ expert testimony establishing the standard of care that the Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT) allegedly violated was inadmissible. Id. ¶ 1
Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso) · 2023-04-11 · Published · cited 0×
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS § THE CITY OF EL PASO, TEXAS, No. 08-22-00155-CV § Appellant, Appeal from the §
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2023-01-11 · Published · cited 0×
Judgment rendered January 11, 2023. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 2166, La. C.C.P. ***** ON REMAND ***** No. 54,364-CA
Supreme Court of Iowa · 2024-01-26 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 22–0303 Submitted December 13, 2023—Filed January 26, 2024 BRADLEY A. CHICOINE, D.C.; DR. BRADLEY A. CHICOINE, D.C., P.C.; MARK A. NILES, D.C.; NILES CHIROPRACTIC, INC.; and ROD R. REBARCAK, D.C., on behalf of themselves and those like situated, Appellants, and BEN WINECOFF; STEVEN A. MUELLER, D.C.; BRADLEY J. BROWN, D.C.; BROWN CHIROPRACTIC, P.C.; MARK A. KRUSE, D.C.; MARK A
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · 2009-03-04 · Published · cited 0×
i i i i i i MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-08-00181-CV Rochelle COHEN-SAGI and Annette Goldberg, Appellants v. PROFINANCE ASSOCIATES, INC., and Michael B. Jones, Individually,
M.H. v. D.A.public domain
Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2009-08-25 · Published · cited 2× · 17 So. 3d 610; 2009 Miss. App. LEXIS 555
ISHEE, J., for the Court. ¶ 1. Following a hearing on December 20, 2007, the Chancery Court of the First Judicial District of Hinds County granted *612custody of Marshall,1 a minor child, to his maternal grandparents, Donald and Annette. The chancery court also terminated the parental rights of Marshall’s father, Mark. Mar
District Court, C.D. California · 2012-11-07 · Published · cited 61× · 905 F. Supp. 2d 1088; 41 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1248; 105 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1541; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 169112; 2012 WL 5938563
ORDER RE PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION DOLLY M. GEE, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction [Doc. # 41]. Defendants filed an opposition to the Motion on September 4, 2012 [Doc. # 71]. Plaintiffs filed their reply on September 7, . 2012 [Doc. # 79]. *1092The Court held a h
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008-12-24 · Published · cited 46× · 551 F.3d 374; 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 26085; 105 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 19; 2008 WL 5396243
551 F.3d 374 (2008) Peter G. GRAIN, M.D., and Annette Barnes, M.D., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. TRINITY HEALTH, MERCY HEALTH SERVICES INC., d/b/a Mercy Hospital, and Mary R. Trimmer, Defendants-Appellees. No. 08-1410. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Submitted: December 12, 2008. Decided and Filed: December 24, 2008.