Cases

MEMORANDUM *** Anne Delaney appeals the district court’s order remanding her application for Social Security disability benefits to the Commissioner of Social Security for further consideration.1 She contends we should reverse the district court’s order and direct that her application for benefits be granted. We review for abuse of discretion the disfrict court’s decision to rema

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Kohn, J.), entered July 6, 1996, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain serious injury as defined by Insurance Law § 5102 (d), and granted the plaintiffs cross motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability. Ordered

ORDER DAVID C. NORTON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter is before the court on a motion for summary judgment filed by defendant the United States of America (“government”). For the reasons set forth below, the court grants the government’s motion. I. BACKGROUND On February 24, 2012, Kalvin Hunt (“Hunt”), a Marine on involuntary leave while appealing his dishono

Order Overruling Trustee’s Objection to Amended Chapter 13 Plan for Failure to Offer All Social Security Income ROBYN L. MOBERLY, Bankruptcy Judge. The Trustee raised several objections to the Debtor’s First Amended Chapter 13 Plan, all of which hinge upon the treatment of Debtor’s social security income and whether the failure to include all of Debtor’s social security income in Debtor’s plan payments is

ENTRY ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT TANYA WALTON PRATT, JUDGE This matter is before the Court on Defendant, Indianapolis-Marion County Forensics Services Agency’s (the “Agency”), Motion for Summary Judgment (Filing No. 55). Following termination of her employment as a forensic scientist for the Agency, Plaintiff Tami Atwell (“Ms. At-well”), filed a complaint alleging disability discriminat

ORDER Hon. Jane Magnus-Stinson, Chief Judge Plaintiff Susan Amos, M.D,, is a female physician who was elected Coroner of Vigo County, Indiana in November 2012. Her predecessor as Coroner, Dr. Ronald Kohr, is a male physician specializing in pathology who performed autopsies in Vigo County without charging the County fees in addition to his Coroner salary. Prior to his retirement in 2012, Dr. Kohr advised

ENTRY ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR CONDITIONAL CERTIFICATION OF COLLECTIVE ACTION Hon. William T. Lawrence, Judge This cause is before the Court on the Plaintiffs’ Motion for Conditional Certification of Collective Action and Court-Authorized Notice Pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 216(b) (Dkt. No. 15). This motion is fully briefed, and the Court, being duly advised, DENIES the motion for the reasons, and to the exten

659 F.Supp.2d 185 (2009) Melvin DELANEY, Jr., et al., Plaintiffs, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 08-1651 (RMC). United States District Court, District of Columbia. October 6, 2009. *189 Melvin Delaney, Jr., Washington, DC, pro se. Melodie Venee Shuler, Washington, DC, pro se. M. Delane

Hon. Jane Magnus-Stinson, Chief Judge On Friday June 15, 2018, a jury returned a verdict for Plaintiffs Courtney and Brian Webster after finding that Defendant CDI Indiana, LLC ("CDI") was legally responsible for the conduct of a radiologist who negligently reviewed a CT examination performed on Ms. Webster, resulting in a missed diagnosis of recurrent, terminal rectal cancer. [Filing No. 167; Filing No. 166-1 at 17.] The j

OPINION OF THE COURT Joseph D. McGuire, J. *839Before the court is an ex parte application for a judgment of foreclosure and sale, including a request for approval of attorneys fees for counsel to the mortgagee. The court has considered the proposed judgment of foreclosure and sale and all prior submitted documents, including an e

612 F.Supp.2d 38 (2009) Melvin DELANEY, Jr., et al., Plaintiffs, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 08-1651 (RMC). United States District Court, District of Columbia. May 4, 2009. *40 Melvin Delaney, Jr., Washington, DC, pro se. Melodie Venee Shuler, Washington, DC, pro se. M. Delaney, Was

81 S.W.3d 445 (2002) Etta Jeanne DELANEY, Appellant, v. Adrian Averil DAVIS, Appellee. No. 14-00-00972-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (14th Dist.). June 20, 2002. *446 Cindy L. Miller, Bryan, Lisa Ann Hubacek, College Station, for appellant. Michael H. Norman, Houston, for appellee. Panel consists of Justice

COULSON, Justice. This is a limited appeal by the wife from a decree of divorce in which error is urged in the property division, the amount awarded as attorneys’ fees, and the amount set for child support. We reverse and remand the property division and affirm the remainder of the decree. Carolyn Ann Delaney (Mrs. Delaney or Appellant) sued George Jerome Delaney (Mr. Delaney or Appellee) for divorce. Mr.

ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT larry j. McKinney, judge This case is before the Court on Defendants’, Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc. (collectively, “Bard”), Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt.30) on Plaintiffs’j Bobby Don Bowersock, Charlotte Robinson, and Mark Bowersock (collectively “Plaintiffs’ ”), Complaint. Dkt. 1. Plaintiffs allege that a hernia patch manufactured by Bard and impl

PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. State v. Rife, 733 So.2d 541 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999). We also grant the State’s request to certify the following question also certified in Rife: ALTHOUGH WILLINGNESS OR CONSENT OF THE MINOR IS NOT A DEFENSE TO SEXUAL BATTERY OF A MINOR, MAY IT BE CONSIDERED BY THE COURT AS A MITIGATING FACTOR IN SENTENCING? AFFIRMED; QUESTION CERTI

74 F.Supp.2d 824 (1999) Raymond J. PERRY and Louis Zezoff, Jr., Plaintiffs, v. Terrence E. DELANEY, individually and in his capacity as U.S. Marshal for the Southern District of Illinois, United States Marshals Service, General Security Services Corporation, Eduardo Gonzalez, Stacia Hylton, Andrew Pierucki, Jim Marble, Charles E. Witcher, and Joseph Zak, all being sued in their capacities as individuals, Defendants. No. 97-3

5 F.Supp.2d 617 (1998) Raymond J. PERRY and Louis Zezoff, Jr., Plaintiffs, v. Terrence E. DELANEY, individually and in his capacity as U.S. Marshal for the Southern District of Illinois, United States Marshals Service, General Security Services Corporation, Eduardo Gonzalez, Stacia Hylton, Andrew Pierucki, Jim Marble, Charles E. Witcher and Joseph Zak, all being sued in their capacities as individuals, Defendants. No. 97-300

529 N.W.2d 288 (1995) Richard P. MEYERS and Judith K. Meyers, Appellants, v. Michael R. DELANEY and Robin Lynne Delaney, Appellees. No. 93-1488. Supreme Court of Iowa. March 29, 1995. *289 Kermit L. Dunahoo of Dunahoo Law Firm, Des Moines, for appellants. Ann M. Cisco of White & Johnson, P.C., Cedar Rapids, for appelle

82 Cal.Rptr.2d 610 (1999) 971 P.2d 986 20 Cal.4th 23 Kay DELANEY, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Calvin BAKER, Sr., et al. Defendants and Appellants. No. S067060. Supreme Court of California. March 4, 1999. *611 Klauschie & Shannon, Law Offices of Klauschie & Elie, Thomas J. K

SEE, Justice (dissenting). The narrow question before this Court is whether the State presented substantial evidence indicating that for tax year 1991 the taxpayers, Delaney’s, Inc., and Spring-dale Stores, Inc., changed the use of the subject property from forest use to commercial use. The jury found that the property, for tax year 1991 and for the subsequent tax years at issue, 1992 through 1994, 1996, and