Cases

Finally, in evaluating motions to compel arbitration, "Courts treat the facts as they would in ruling on a summary judgment." Diversicare Leasing Corp. v. Hutchinson , Civil Action No. 17-42-HRW, 2018 WL 771320, at *2 (E.D. Ky. Feb. 7, 2018) (quoting Kovac v. Superior Dairy, Inc. ,

OPINION HILLMAN, District Judge. This matter involves an alleged breach of a Red Roof Inn franchise agreement. Before the Court are three motions: plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment, defendants’ motion to amend or correct their opposition to summary judgment, and defendants’ motion to strike plaintiffs affidavit. For the reasons explained below, the motion for partial summary judgment will be

B. Libel Per Quod Count Two of the Complaint alleges Defendants defamed all Plaintiffs through the airing of a series of broadcasts stating or implying various questionable business dealings with Gregory, including alleging the unlawful altering of the price term of a home-repair contract without Gregory's knowledge or consent and seeking liquidated damages based on that price term. Under Iowa law, a plaintiff must prove fi

FILED Oct 11, 2018 10:14 AM(CT) TENNESSEE COURT OF

OPINION HILLMAN, District Judge. This matter involves an alleged breach of a Red Roof Inn franchise agreement. Before the Court are three motions: plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment, defendants’ motion to amend or correct their opposition to summary judgment, and defendants’ motion to strike plaintiffs affidavit. For the reasons explained below, the motion for partial summary judgment will be

FILED Aug 13, 2018 10:35 AM(CT) TENNESSEE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION

************************************************ The “officially released” date that appears near the beginning of an opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it is released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for the filing of postopin- ion motions and petitions for certification is the “offi- cially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical cor

PER CURIAM. Appellant Yakov Segalis appeals an order denying his motion to vacate judgment and for sanctions. The judgment against Segalis was void for lack of jurisdiction and denial of due process, and the trial court erred in failing to vacate it. We therefore reverse and remand, with directions to vacate the judgment and reconsider the motion for sanctions.

HILLMAN, District Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND............. 540 A. Factual Background Related to Civil Action 10-cv-4065 ...................541 B. Factual Background Related to Civil Action 10-cv-4120 ..................542 II. DISCUSSION...........................................................542

SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ Case No. 6D2023-2559 Lower Tribunal No. 20-CA-003288 _____________________________ TYLER FORREY, DANIELLE FORREY, MILES GARNER, ROOF RX, LLC, ISLAND LIFE CHARTER COMPANY, THE BETTER ROOF GUY, LLC, and MILES HIGH, LLC, Appellants,

[Cite as State ex rel. Prime Roof Solutions, Inc. v. Indus. Comm., 2024-Ohio-5221.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT State ex rel. Prime Roof Solutions, Inc., : Relator, : No. 22AP-523 v. : (REGULAR CALENDAR) Industrial Commission of Ohio et al.,

[Cite as Parker v. Red Roof Inn, 2017-Ohio-7595.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) DONALD KEVIN PARKER C.A. No. 28489 Appellant v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT ENTERED IN THE RED RO

Leasing Control Inc. v Red Roof Inns, Inc. (2020 NY Slip Op 07457) Leasing Control Inc. v Red Roof Inns, Inc. 2020 NY Slip Op 07457 Decided on December 10, 2020 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York

Leasing Control Inc. v Red Roof Inns, Inc. (2020 NY Slip Op 07457) Leasing Control Inc. v Red Roof Inns, Inc. 2020 NY Slip Op 07457 Decided on December 10, 2020 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York

247 P.3d 1107 (2011) SIMMONS SELF-STORAGE PARTNERS, LLC, A Nevada Limited Liability Company; Anthem Mini-Storage, LLC, A Nevada Limited Liability Company; Horizon Mini-Storage, LLC, A Nevada Limited Liability Company; Montecito Mini-Storage Partners, LLC, A Nevada Limited Liability Company; Lake Mead Property, LLC; Silver Creek I, LLC; Colonial Bank, A Subsidiary of the Colonial Bancgroup, Inc., A Delaware Corporation; Southwest Steel Systems, LLC, a/k/a

[Cite as Parker v. Red Roof Inn, 2016-Ohio-3147.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) DONALD KEVIN PARKER C.A. No. 27894 Appellant v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT ENTERED IN THE RED RO

D.E. 686, Ex. 1, ¶ 16.2 (emphasis added). The subcontract between Weaver Cooke and WSI defines the "Subcontractor's Work" in Attachment A-1 to the subcontract, as follows: Provide all required labor, material, equipment, supervision, taxes and insurance to provide waterproofing, traffic coatings, and joint sealants in strict accordance with the plans and specifications and following special requirements: W

In both of its supplemental memoranda, ECM focused on the contributory negligence issue, to the exclusion of the first issue cited by the district court. D.E. 1413, 1509. Weaver Cooke did the same. D.E. 1436, 1518. The court will, however, address both of those issues, as well as the related question of proximate cause. DISCUSSION The specific damages that Weaver Cooke alleges ECM to have caused are set out

130 Nev., Advance Opinion 57 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA SIMMONS SELF-STORAGE No. 59210 PARTNERS, LLC, A NEVADA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY; ANTHEM MINI-STORAGE, LLC, A NEVADA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY; FILED HORIZON MINI-STORAGE, LLC, A AUG 07 2014 NEVADA LIMITED LIABILITY

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D2024-0132 _____________________________ FLORIDA ROOF MASTERS, LLC, and NICHOLAS D. CARLUCCI, Appellants, v. BONNIE S. PAGE, an individual, Appellee. _____________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Columbia County. Mark E. Feagle, Judge. December