⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

5 opinions for “Angiuoni v. Town of Billerica”

Supreme Court of the United States · 2017-02-27 · Published · cited 0× · 137 S. Ct. 1206; 197 L. Ed. 2d 247
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016-09-23 · Published · cited 4× · 838 F.3d 34; 101 Fed. R. Serv. 641; 207 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3303; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 17419; 100 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,642; 2016 WL 5335492
LIPEZ, Circuit Judge. Joseph Angiuoni, a military veteran, brought a claim against the Town of Biller-ica and Daniel Rosa, Chief of the Billerica Police Department, under the Uniform Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (“USERRA”), see 38 U.S.C. § 4301-4335, claiming that his status as a veteran was a motivating factor for defendants’ termination of his employment. A ju
District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2014-02-05 · Published · cited 3× · 999 F. Supp. 2d 318; 2014 WL 494803; 198 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2416; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14517; 97 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,005
MEMORANDUM & ORDER GORTON, District Judge. This case arose after plaintiff Joseph Angiuoni (“plaintiff’ or “Angiuoni”) was terminated from his position as a probationary officer with the Billerica Police Department., Plaintiff filed suit against the Town of Billerica (“the Town”) and its Chief of Police, Daniel Rosa (“Rosa”) (collectively, “defendants”). He alleges that defendants violated the
District Court, W.D. New York · 2014-08-05 · Published · cited 13× · 35 F. Supp. 3d 359; 2014 WL 3866130; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 108429
DECISION AND ORDER ELIZABETH A. WOLFORD, District Judge. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff William Croft (“Officer Croft” or “Plaintiff’), a patrolman with defendant the Village of Newark Police Department (the “NPD”), sued Defendants alleging that he was denied promotions and other employment-related benefits as a result of his service in the National Guard, and retaliated against for ass
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016-12-12 · Published · cited 3× · 843 F.3d 129; 2016 WL 7187320; 208 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3001; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 21993; 100 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,700
*130 OPINION OF THE COURT FUENTES, Circuit Judge. After the District Court denied Plaintiff Anthony J. Carroll’s motion for partial summary judgment and Defendant' Delaware River Port Authority’s motion for summary judgment, it certified the following legal question for our review: