Cases

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed December 8, 2005 Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed December 8, 2005. In The

Affirmed and Memorandum Majority and Concurring Opinions filed August 22, 2023. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-22-00306-CV VIJAYRAMA POREDDY, M.D. AND AUSTIN GASTROENTEROLOGY, P.A., Appellants V. MA ANGELICA HERNANDEZ DE SOLIS, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF SERAFIN SOLIS RICO, AN INCAPACITATED PERSON, AND AS NEXT FRIEND

Affirmed and Memorandum Majority and Concurring Opinions filed August 22, 2023. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-22-00306-CV VIJAYRAMA POREDDY, M.D. AND AUSTIN GASTROENTEROLOGY, P.A., Appellants V. MA ANGELICA HERNANDEZ DE SOLIS, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF SERAFIN SOLIS RICO, AN INCAPACITATED PERSON, AND AS NEXT FRIEND FOR MARCO SOLI

LESLIE H. SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judge: Three children who are natives of Mexico, through a next friend, appeal the district court’s finding under the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction that they were being wrongfully retained in the United States and should be returned to Angelica Sanchez, their mother. While this appeal was pending, the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services grant

ON SECOND PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING LESLIE H. SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judge: Today, for the third time, we address an appeal by three children who are natives of Mexico, who seek reversal of the district court’s finding under the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction that they were being wrongfully retained in the United States and should be returned to Angelica Sanchez, their

Toomey, J. The plaintiffs, Angelica Hernandez, ppa Esteban Hernandez and Esteban Hernandez (“the Hernandezes”), bring this action for medical malpractice, alleging negligence, breach of express and implied warranties and lack of informed consent. The action arises from the July 9, 1996 medical treatment of plaintiff Angelica Hernandez (“Ms. Hernandez”), who suffered three grand mal seizures during labor and is currently in a ve

MEMORANDUM *** Edmundo Hernandez-Gonzalez and Angelica Maria Martin-Iniguez, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing their appeal from an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying their application for cancellation of removal. We dismiss the petition for review. We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s discretionary det

SILER, Senior Circuit Judge. Petitioner Ana Margarita Hernandez-Cabana, 1 a native and citizen of Colombia, petitions this court for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) order affirming the immigration judge’s (“IJ”) denial of her withholding of removal claim. We deny review for reasons stated hereafter.

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas July 12, 2022 No. 04-22-00356-CR Angelica NAVARRO-DEPAZ, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas July 27, 2022 No. 04-22-00356-CR Angelica NAVARRO-DEPAZ, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT DIEGO SANJUAN, Appellant, v. GUARDIANSHIP OF MARIA ANGELICA MENA, Appellee. No. 4D21-2857 [September 7, 2022] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; M

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See and compare Asay v. State, 580 So.2d 610 (Fla.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 265, 116 L.Ed.2d 218 (1991); Sired v. State, 399 So.2d 964 (Fla.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 984, 102 S.Ct. 2257, 72 L.Ed.2d 862 (1982).

JAMES L. DENNIS, Circuit Judge: Jorge Carlos Vergara Madrigal (Ver-gara) and Angelica Fuentes Tellez (Fuentes) are the parents of two young daughters, ages five and three years (the Children). The family resided in Mexico City, Mexico, until April 2015, when Fuentes took the Children on vacation but wrongfully retained them in the United States thereafter. Vergara initiated procee

Matter of Escobar v Argueta-Hernandez (2024 NY Slip Op 03425) Matter of Escobar v Argueta-Hernandez 2024 NY Slip Op 03425 Decided on June 20, 2024 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursua

PER CURIAM. Upon the state’s proper confession of error, we reverse the sentence imposed and remand with instructions to enter the agréed-upon sentence. Reversed and remanded with instructions.

Case: 12-50783 Document: 00512549179 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/03/2014 REVISED MARCH 3, 2014 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED N

STAHL, Circuit Judge. In this appeal, plaintiffs Miguel de Case-nave and his wife, Maria A. Morales de Casenave, challenge the district court’s dismissal of their complaint as time-barred. We affirm the judgment of the district court, although on different grounds. I. Procedural Background On March 2

Case: 12-50783 Document: 00512654225 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/05/2014 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 12-50783 FILED

REINHARDT, Circuit Judge. I The issue before us is whether a driver who transports a group of illegal aliens from a drop-off point in the United States to another destination in this country commits only the offense of transporting aliens “within” the United States or whether that individual is also guilty of the additional offense of aiding and abetting the crime of “bringing” the aliens “to” the Unit

NUMBER 13-21-00454-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG TEXAS SOUTHMOST COLLEGE, Appellant, v. LINDA HERNANDEZ, Appellee. On appeal from the 445th District Court