Cases

103 Cal.Rptr.2d 672 (2001) 24 Cal.4th 945 16 P.3d 94 CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S OF LONDON et al., Petitioners, v. The SUPERIOR COURT of Los Angeles County, Respondent; Powerine Oil Company, Inc., et al., Real Parties in Interest. No. S084057. Supreme Court of California. February 1, 2001. Rehearing Denied

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA G REG SHEPHERD, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION, Defendant/Appellee. No. CV-19-0144-PR Filed March 8, 2021 Appeal from the Superior Court in Maricopa County The Honorable Aimee L. Anderson, Judge

TIMBERS, Circuit Judge: The question presented is whether the district court correctly exercised its discretion in staying proceedings in the Massachusetts District Court pending the outcome of a related action in the California Superior Court. We hold that it did. Appellant, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (L

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT EDWIN HARDEMAN, Nos. 19-16636 Plaintiff-Appellee/ 19-16708 Cross-Appellant, D.C. Nos. v. 3:16-cv-00525-VC 3:16-md-02741-VC MONSANTO COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant/ Cross-Appellee. OPINION Appeal from

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE RICHARD F. BURKHART, WILLIAM E. ) KELLY, RICHARD S. LAVERY, ) THOMAS R. PRATT, and GERALD ) GREEN, individually and on behalf of all ) others similarly situated, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2018-0691-NAC

Reversed; Dismissed in part and Remanded in part; Opinion Filed January 21, 2020 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-19-01177-CV VENATOR MATERIALS PLC, SIMON TURNER, KURT D. OGDEN, STEPHEN IBBOTSON, RUSS R. STOLLE, HUNTSMAN CORPORATION,

William H. Orrick, United States District Judge Genus Lifesciences Inc. ("Genus") is a competitor of Lannett Company Inc. and Cody Laboratories, Inc., Lannett's wholly owned subsidiary, in the market for cocaine hydrochloride nasal spray. It is suing Lannett and Cody for false advertising and maintaining a monopoly related to Lannett's production of C-Topical® ("C-Topical"), a cocaine hydrochloride solution that competes with Genus'

On September 7, 2018, Radiant filed a six-count Verified Complaint ("Complaint") against Charles "Chad" Furstenau, Jr., and BTX Air Express of Detroit, a Connecticut limited liability company ("BTX Detroit"), alleging the following claims: Count I - Declaratory Judgment (Against Furstenau); Count II - Breach of Fiduciary Duty (Against Furstenau); Count III - Misa

NEWMAN, Circuit Judge, dissenting. This en banc court has split into two factions, neither of which resolves the issues of divided infringement. A scant majority of the court adopts a new theory of patent infringement, based on criminal law, whereby any entity that “advises, encourages, or otherwise induces,” maj. op. 1307, or “causes, urges, encourages, or aids the infringing conduct,” id. a

ZELON, J. *548This appeal arises out of a wrongful death suit brought by the family of Sunja An against a number of business entities, alleging that a humidifier cleaning agent manufactured in Korea and sold in California caused An's death. One of the defendants named in the action is appellant Jayone Foods, Inc. (Jayone), a California importer

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT SANFORD S. WADLER, No. 17-16193 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 3:15-cv-02356- JCS BIO-RAD LABORATORIES, INC., a Delaware Corporation; NORMAN SCHWARTZ,

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT SANFORD S. WADLER, No. 17-16193 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 3:15-cv-02356- JCS BIO-RAD LABORATORIES, INC., a Delaware Corporation; NORMAN SCHWARTZ,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS MARGARET M. MORROW, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE On May 22, 2014, ScripsAmerica, Inc. (“Scrips”) filed this action against Iron-ridge Global LLC d/b/a Ironridge Global IV, Ltd., John Kirkland, and Brendan O’Neil (collectively “Ironridge”), as well as certain fictitious defendants.1 The complaint alleges, claims for securities fraud, br

RAWLINSON, Circuit Judge, with whom Judge BERZON joins, dissenting: This is admittedly a fairly close case but, upon reflection, I respectfully dissent from the conclusion of my esteemed colleagues that this case fits within the parameters for removal under the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (CAFA). I start from the well-established premise that removal is disfavored when determining fed

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MARGALIT CORBER; RENE CARO; No. 13-56306 STEVE DANTZLER; LINDA SOWARDS; LORI HUISMAN; JOHNNY GEORGE, D.C. No. SR.; TERRY PERRY; WILLIAM 2:12-cv-09986- RACKLEY; ANGELA YOUNG; PAMELA PSG-E RODRIGUEZ; STEVEN SYVERSON; OLGA CAICOYA; JANET CARROLL; ROSE CASH; ULAD CELENTANO; VIRGINIA COSTANZO; KIMBERLY FILLIGIM; ARMELDIA SMITH; CARLA WEST; JOANNE B

Filed 11/27/13 (unmodified opn. attached) CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION [NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT] IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR WILLIAM PFEIFER et al., B232315

*1280 Opinion MANELLA, J. William and Anne Pfeifer asserted claims for negligence, strict liability, and loss of consortium against John Crane, Inc. (JCI), alleging that its asbestos-laden products caused William Pfeifer’s mesothelioma. During the trial, the court rejected JCI’s pr

OPINION & ORDER KATHERINE B. FORREST, District Judge: On March 11, 2014, Regeneron filed twin patent infringement actions: one against Merus B.V. (“Merus”), a company based in the Netherlands, and another against Ablexis LLC (“Ablexis”). (See ECF No. 1.) In short complaints, each consisting of a few substantive paragraphs, Regeneron accused both companies of infringing U.S. Patent No.

Opinion by Judge RAWLINSON; Dissent by Judge GOULD. OPINION RAWLINSON, Circuit Judge: This case presents the issue of whether removal was proper under the “mass action” provision of the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (CAFA), Pub.L. No. 109-2, 119 Stat. 4 (2005), when plaintiffs moved for coordination pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure section 404. CAFA authorizes federal

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JUDITH ROMO; VINCENT TALDONE; No. 13-56310 ROBIN TAYLER; MARGARET TAYLOR; RANDY TAYLOR; RAY D.C. No. TEETS; LAWRENCE TELLS; KATHRYN 5:12-cv-02036- TEMCHACK; CHARLES TERRY; PSG-E VERONICA TERRY; ROBERTA THORNE; MARGARET TIVIS; LINDA TODD; DELORES TOOHEY; OPINION DEBRA TOURVILLE; DENA TSOUALS; ALLEN TURNER; CAROLYN TURNER; WANDA TURNER; STARLET TYRONE; GLORIA