⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

8 opinions for “Angela Kay Ragsdale”

District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2014-10-20 · Published · cited 0× · 62 F. Supp. 3d 535; 23 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1040; 30 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1757; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 148822; 2014 WL 5342582
MEMORANDUM RULING PATRICIA MINALDI, District Judge. Before the. court is Bishop Noland Episcopal Day School’s (“EDS”) Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 16], to which the plaintiff, Heather Bernard (“Bernard”), has filed an Opposition [Doc. 20], to which the defendant has filed a Reply [Doc. 21]. For the following reasons, the defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 16] be and hereby is GRANTED,
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021-10-07 · Published · cited 0× · 2021 NY Slip Op 05388
Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (2021 NY Slip Op 05388) BODY { font-family : "Times New Roman", Times, serif; font-size : larger; } P { line-height: 150%; text-indent: 2em } Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law  468-a
District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2003-01-29 · Published · cited 10× · 243 F. Supp. 2d 386; 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1354; 2003 WL 231309
243 F.Supp.2d 386 (2003) VOLUMETRICS MEDICAL IMAGING, INC., Plaintiff, v. ATL ULTRASOUND, INC., Defendant. No. 1:01-CV-182. United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina. January 29, 2003. *389 Michael S. Connor, Alston & Bird, LLP, Charlotte, NC, Michael P. Kenny, Angela Payne James, Alston & Bird, Atlanta, GA, Mark
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 2013-08-13 · Published · cited 0×
Affirm in part; Reverse and Render in part; Remand and Opinion Filed August 13, 2013 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas __________________________________ NO. 05-12-00963-CV CITY OF DALLAS, TEXAS, Appellant V. ANTHONY ARREDONDO, CHARLES S. SWANER, JAM
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 2013-08-13 · Published · cited 0×
Affirm in part; Reverse and Render in part; Remand and Opinion Filed August 13, 2013 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas __________________________________ NO. 05-12-00963-CV CITY OF DALLAS, TEXAS, Appellant V. ANTHONY ARREDONDO, CHARLES S. SWANER, JAM
Armstrong v. Statepublic domain
Supreme Court of Florida · 2003-10-30 · Published · cited 37× · 862 So. 2d 705; 2003 WL 22454933
862 So.2d 705 (2003) Lancelot Uriley ARMSTRONG, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. Lancelot Uriley Armstrong, Petitioner, v. James V. Crosby, Jr., etc., Respondent. Nos. SC01-1874, SC02-1122. Supreme Court of Florida. October 30, 2003. Rehearing Denied December 19, 2003. *709 Terri L. Backhus,
District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2009-03-31 · Published · cited 3× · 257 F.R.D. 260; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33967; 2009 WL 1040107
*264MEMORANDUM OPINION KARON OWEN BOWDRE, District Judge. These consolidated securities fraud cases come before the court on motions to certify *265classes. The Bondholder Plaintiffs1 seek certification of the following class: All pers
Court of Appeals of Texas · 2013-08-13 · Published · cited 0× · 415 S.W.3d 327; 2013 WL 4076868
OPINION Opinion by Justice LANG-MIERS. The City of Dallas filed these interlocutory appeals from orders denying its pleas to the jurisdiction in four lawsuits filed against the City by current and former police officers, firefighters, and rescue officers (the Officers) alleging that the City breached its contract with them regarding their pay. We consolidated the appeals for the purpose of