Cases

ORDER DAVE WHALIN, United States Magistrate Judge. This order considers two motions. Both motions arise from a discovery dispute that involves an Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) claim. See 29 U.S.C. § 1001, et seq. (DN 43, 46). The claim is brought by Plaintiff John A. Mullins, a former employee of Gordon Food Services (GFS). GFS maintains its own employee

74 F.Supp.2d 1067 (1999) Robert MULLINS, Michael D. Desruisseaux, and Thomas Miles, Plaintiffs, v. Craven CROWELL, Johnny H. Hayes, and William H. Kennoy, Defendants. Michael G. Murks, Plaintiff, v. Craven Crowell, Johnny H. Hayes, and William H. Kennoy, Defendants. Millard Shelton, Plaintiff, v. Craven Crowell, Johnny H. Hayes, and William H. Kennoy, Defendants. James R. Williams, Plaintiff, v. Craven Crowell,

OPINION OF THE COURT BY JUSTICE VENTERS Stephen Patton (Stephen) was an eighth-grader at Allen Central Middle School (ACMS) when he committed suicide, allegedly because he was being bullied at school.1 Sheila Patton, as Adminis-tratrix of Stephen’s estate,2 filed this lawsuit alleging various teachers3 and administrators

HUNSTEIN, Justice. Appellant Valentino Jackson was convicted of felony murder and associated crimes in connection with the shooting death of Willie Bailey.1 On appeal, Jackson argues that the State engaged in pros-ecutorial misconduct during closing argument and that his trial counsel rendered constitutionally ineffective assistance. Finding no error, we affirm. The evidence pres

Opinion of the Court by Justice VENTERS. Each of the Appellants in this action was a plaintiff in a lawsuit brought in the Boone Circuit Court,1 Boone County, Kentucky, against American Home Products, the company that marketed the anti-obesity drug combination commonly known as “Fen-Phen.” As further explained below, Appellants’ claims in that case were transferred from the Boone

CRENSHAW, J., Dissenting. Because I cannot conclude that the trial court abused its broad discretion in allowing the jury to hear a partial read-back of the detective’s testimony, I must respectfully dissent. A trial court does not abuse its discretion by permitting a partial read-back of testimony that directly relates to the jury’s inquiry, is not misleading, and does not place undue emp

************************************************ The “officially released” date that appears near the beginning of an opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it is released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for the filing of postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical correct

787 F.Supp.2d 1329 (2011) UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Angela PARATO, Plaintiff, v. UNADILLA HEALTH CARE CENTER, INC., James Ray Irwin, Bob Lemmon, Charlotte Vestal, Leroy Shewman, Gred Speight, E.K. Chaney, Ronney Ledford, Betty Ward, Margaret Whitehead, Sherry Evans, Barbara Gaston, and Bruce Whyte, Defendants. Civil Action No. 5:07-CV-76 (MTT). United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Macon D

This list is being published pursuant to Gov.Bar R. 1(15). The following persons have applied to take the February 2017 Ohio Bar Examination. Allen Taylor Gene Vance Lima Ashland Sarah Kathleen Lewis Austinburg Belmont Carson Lee Schambach St. Clairsville Butler Eric ScottBeutel Liberty Township Marc Edward Bras

Opinion of the Court by Justice VENTERS. This case arose in the aftermath of the settlement of Darla S. Guard, et' ál. v. American Home Products, Inc. (Guard).1 The Guard case, which is also known as “Jonetta Moore, et al. v. American Home Products, Inc.,” or the “Moore ” case, was brought by Kentucky residents who had taken th

ORDER David S. Doty, Judge United States District Court This matter is. before the court upon the objection by plaintiff Angela Kristie Hey to the July 29, 2015, report and recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Franklin L. Noel (R & R). In the R. & R, the magistrate judge recommends that the court deny the motion for summary judgment by Hey and grant the motion for summary judgment by d

Barings LLC v. Fowler, 2025 NCBC 6. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION MECKLENBURG COUNTY 24CV012798-590 BARINGS LLC, Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND OPINION IAN FOWLER, KELSEY TUCKER, ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS and CORINTHIA GLOBAL MANAGEMENT LIMITED,

980 P.2d 1138 (1999) 160 Or. App. 166 WELLS FARGO & COMPANY and First Interstate Bank of Oregon, N.A., Appellants, v. INDUSTRIAL INDEMNITY COMPANY, Respondent. (960604180; CA A98825) Court of Appeals of Oregon. Argued and Submitted January 21, 1999. Decided April 28, 1999. *1140 Jeffre

400 F.Supp.2d 134 (2005) Besseye NEAL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DIRECTOR, D.C. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 93-2420 (RCL). United States District Court, District of Columbia. November 22, 2005. *135 Ted Justice Williams, Avis E. Buchanan, DC, Public Defender Service, Jeffrey Fred Liss, Mary Elizab

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 15-0638 Filed December 21, 2016 STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. DENNIS BROUSE, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Jeffrey D. Farrell, Judge. Dennis Brouse appeals his conviction for fraudulent practice in the first degree on retrial. R

PER CURIAM. Jesse Earl Scheuing was indicted for murder made capital pursuant to § 13A-5-40(a)(2), Ala.Code 1975, because it occurred during a robbery in the first degree of Sean Adam Cook. In a related case, Scheuing was also indicted for theft of property in the first degree for the theft of a 2003 GMC Yukon sport-utility vehicle, pursuant to I 13A-8-3, Ala.Code 1975. On May 6, 2010, the State moved the circuit court to co

This is an appeal from an action brought by First Real Estate against Winters to recover an amount paid by First Real Estate in settlement of a claim made by Ronald and Angela Key. Winters had employed First Real Estate to sell her home. The Keys, husband and wife, purchased the Winters house for $62,500. Much of the information and characteristics pertaining to the house were summarized in a multiple listing service publication. The features of Winters's home contained in the

[Cite as State v. Hurt, 2024-Ohio-3115.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO, : APPEAL NO. C-230370 TRIAL NO. B-2001994-B Plaintiff-Appellee, : vs. : O P I N I O N. DYLAN

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA September 2020 Term FILED _______________ November 23, 2020 released at 3:00 p.m. No. 20-0014 EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA September 2020 Term FILED _______________ November 23, 2020 released at 3:00 p.m. No. 20-0014 EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK