Cases

FILED Jul 24 2023, 9:19 am CLERK Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ___________ Nos. 15-2823, 16-3837, 16-3959 ANGELA BORRELL, Appellant in 16-3837 v. BLOOMSBURG UNIVERSITY ARTHUR F. RICHER; GEISINGER MEDICAL CENTER, Appellants in 15-2823 MICHELLE FICCA, Appella

MEMORANDUM DECISION FILED Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Aug 08 2019, 8:46 am Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the CLERK Indiana Supreme Court purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata,

By the Court, STIGLICH, J.: Nevada adheres to the American Rule of attorney fees-attorney fees may not be awarded unless there is a statute, rule, or contract providing for such an award. This court, however, has recognized a narrow and limited exception for attorney fees as special damages. We have outlined certain requirements for pleading and proving attorney fees as special damages, and we have recognized scenarios that may warr

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER SUSAN RICHARD NELSON, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Partial Motion to Dismiss Counts Two Through Seven [Doc. No. 16]. For the reasons set forth herein, Defendant’s Motion is granted, and portions of Counts Two through Five are dismissed, and Counts Six and Seven are dismissed in their entirety. I. BACKGROUND

FILED Sep 25 2023, 1:39 pm CLERK Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals

MEMORANDUM A. Richard Caputo, United States District Judge Presently before me are Defendant Dr. Michelle Ficca’s (“Dr. Ficca”) Post Trial Motions (Doc. 255) and Defendants Geis-inger Medical Center (“GMC”) and Arthur Richer’s (“Mr. Richer”) (collectively “Geis-inger Defendants”) Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law or New Trial or Remit-titur. (Doc. 257) Because Dr. Ficca is not entitled to judgment as

MEMORANDUM A. RICHARD CAPUTO, District Judge. Presently before the Court are three motions: Plaintiff Angela Borrell’s' (“Bor-rell”) Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, (Doc. 86); Defendant Michelle Fic-ca’s (“Dr. Ficca”) Motion for Summary Judgment, (Doc. 114); and Defendants Geisinger Medical Center (“Geisinger”) and Arthur Richer’s (“Richer”) Motion for Summary Judgment, (Doc. 116).

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION ONE JOHN PATTY, D.O., LLC, ) No. ED106747 ) Plaintiff, ) Appeal from the Circuit Court ) of St. Louis County and )

SULLIVAN, Justice. A juvenile challenges the admissibility of his confession in a delinquency proceeding on grounds that he was not afforded an opportunity for meaningful consultation with his mother and that the waiver of his rights was not knowing and voluntary. We conclude that there was substantial evidence of probative value to support the juvenile court’s decision to admit the confession. We also conclude that the juve

MEMORANDUM A. RICHARD CAPUTO, District Judge. Presently before the Court are motions to dismiss Plaintiff Angela Borrell’s Amended Complaint filed by Defendants Bloomsburg University and Michelle Ficca (Doc. 29) and Geisinger Medical Center and Arther F. Richer. (Doc. 32.) Angela Borrell, formerly a student in the Nurse Anesthesia Program offered by Bloomsburg University in partnership with Geisin

130 F.Supp.2d 222 (2001) UNITED STATES of America, v. Jonathan WILKES, Defendant. No. CR. 97-10235-NG. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. February 20, 2001. *223 *224 Stewart H. Grimes, New Bedford, MA, for Joseph Tremblay, Defendant. Martin Boudreau, Milton, MA, for Paul L

ORDER OF SUMMARY DISPOSITION T1 Rule 1.201 of the Oklahoma Supreme Court Rules provides that "[iJn any case in which it appears that a prior controlling appellate decision is dispositive of the appeal, the court may summarily affirm or reverse, citing in its order of summary disposition this rule and the controlling decision." Okla. S.Ct. Rule 1.201. 12 After reviewing the record in this case, THE COURT FINDS that

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ROBERT M. DOW, Jr., United States District Judge Although four-letter words have a reputation for causing trouble, it is a three-letter acronym, UHC, that has precipitated the present dispute between Plaintiff University Healthsystem Consortium and Defendant UnitedHealth Group, Incorporated. Plaintiff alleges that Defendant improperly has used its trademark, “UHC,” in

55 P.3d 470 (2002) 2002 OK CIV APP 89 Linda SEGARS, as administrator of the Estate of John Segars, and Linda Segars, an individual, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Denver McCORMICK, an individual; Linda McCormick, an individual; Arlena Dunbar, an individual; and Jackie Bosler, an individual, Defendants/Appellees, and Southwest Health Care, an Oklahoma Corporation, d/b/a Highland Park Manor, an Oklahoma Nursing Home; and Southw

Cite as 2016 Ark. 112 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CV-15-711 KENNY QUARLES, AS SPECIAL ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF Opinion Delivered: March 17, 2016 BENNIE JEAN QUARLES, DECEASED, AND ON BEHALF OF THE WRONGFUL APPEAL FROM THE CLARK DEATH BENEFICIARIES OF BENNIE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT JEAN QUARLES, DECEASED [CV-2011-11] APPELLANT HONORABLE ROBERT V.

DAVIS, Judge. Angela I. Gessa, by and through Miriam G. Falatek, her attorney-in-fact, challenges the trial court’s order granting Manor Care of Florida, Inc.’s motion to compel arbitration in Gessa’s action against Manor Care for negligence, violation of resident’s rights, and breach of fiduciary duty. We affirm. Gessa was admitted as a resident of Manor Care of Carrollwood on two occasions. Upon each admis

490 F.Supp.2d 565 (2007) JOHN G. and Gloria G., as Parents and Natural Guardians of a Minor, J.M.G., Plaintiffs, v. NORTHEASTERN EDUCATIONAL INTERMEDIATE UNIT 19, Susan Comerford Wzorek, The School District of Abington Heights, Fred R. Rosetti, Ed.D, Clarence Lamanna, Ed.D., David Arnold, Ed.D., William McNulty, and Mariellen Sluko, Defendants. No. 3:06-CV-01900. United States District Court, M.D. Penn

MEMORANDUM A. RICHARD CAPUTO, District Judge. Plaintiffs in this consolidated action comprising both individual cases and putative class actions have moved for final approval of a settlement agreement (the “Settlement”) between Plaintiffs and Defendants Robert K. Mericle and Mericle Construction, Inc. (collectively “Mericle”). (Doc. 1227.) The Settlement received preliminary approval on .February 2

516 F.Supp.2d 424 (2007) JOSEPH M. and Judith M., as Parents and Natural Guardians of a Minor, B.M., Plaintiffs, v. NORTHEASTERN EDUCATIONAL INTERMEDIATE UNIT 19, Susan Comerford Wzorek, The School District of Abington Heights, Fred R. Rosetti, Ed.D, Clarence Lamanna, Ed.D., David Arnold, Ed.D., William McNulty, and Mariellen Sluko, Defendants. No. 3:06-CV-01903. United States District Court, M.D. Penn