Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Angel L. Gonzalez, Jr.”
Gonzalez v. Holderpublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** In these consolidated petitions, Eric Ar-mejo Gonzalez and Lizbeth Angel Lopez, husband and wife and natives and citizens of Mexico, seek review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s decision pretermitting their applications for cancellation of removal, and the BIA’s order denying their motion to reopen based on ineffective assist
Gonzalez v. Holderpublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** In these consolidated petitions, Eric Ar-mejo Gonzalez and Lizbeth Angel Lopez, husband and wife and natives and citizens of Mexico, seek review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s decision pretermitting their applications for cancellation of removal, and the BIA’s order denying their motion to reopen based on ineffective assist
Gonzalez v. Holderpublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** Pedro Gonzalez Gonzalez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review. The evidence Gonzalez Gonzalez presented with his motion to reopen concerned the same basic hardship grounds
Gonzalez v. Holderpublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** Pedro Gonzalez Gonzalez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review. The evidence Gonzalez Gonzalez presented with his motion to reopen concerned the same basic hardship grounds
Gonzalez v. Statepublic domain
ROTHENBERG, Judge. The petitioner, Angel R. Gonzalez, acting pro se, seeks a writ of prohibition, seeking to prohibit the trial court from trying the charges against him. As the petitioner is currently represented by trial counsel in the action below, as well as by specially appointed appellate counsel, his petition must be filed by or adopted by his counsel. Logan v. State, 846 So.2d 472, 475 (Fla.2003). Accordingl
Gonzalez v. Holderpublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** Isaac Francisco Gonzalez, a native and citizen of Nicaragua, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s order denying his applications for relief under 8 U.S.C. §§ 1182(h) and 1255. We dismiss the petition for lack of jurisdiction. Petitioner contends that the agency incorrectly categorized
Martin Gonzalez, Sr. v. City of Maywoodpublic domain
OPINION N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judge: 42 U.S.C. § 1988 authorizes district courts to award the prevailing party in civil rights litigation a “reasonable attorney’s fee.” Several important principles bear on the district court’s determination of a reasonable fee amount. First, the court must compute the fee award using an hourly rate that is based on the “p
Gonzalez v. Holderpublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** Isaac Francisco Gonzalez, a native and citizen of Nicaragua, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s order denying his applications for relief under 8 U.S.C. §§ 1182(h) and 1255. We dismiss the petition for lack of jurisdiction. Petitioner contends that the agency incorrectly categorized
United States v. Gonzalez Becerrapublic domain
OPINION MURPHY, Circuit Judge: I. INTRODUCTION Carlos Gonzalez Becerra pleaded guilty to possessing stolen mail, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1708. In calculating his advisory sentencing range under the United States Sentencing Guidelines, the district court increased Gonzalez Becerra’s offense level by four because the offense “invol
Jaime Gonzalez v. Owens Corningpublic domain
HARDIMAN, Circuit Judge. This appeal involves a putative class action brought by consumers in four states who alleged that Appellees Owens Corning and Owens Corning Sales, LLC (collectively, Owens Corning) sold defective roof shingles and misrepresented the shingles' expected useful life. Appellants challenge an order of the United States District Court for the Western District of Pen
COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE MORGAN T. ZURN LEONARD L. WILLIAMS JUSTICE CENTER VICE CHANCELLOR 500 N. KING STREET, SUITE 11400 WILMINGTON, DELAWARE 19801-3734
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE CARLOS EDUARDO LOREFICE ) LYNCH and GRUPO BELLEVILLE ) HOLDINGS, LLC, a Delaware Limited ) Liability Company, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2019-0356-MTZ ) R. ANGEL GONZALEZ
926 N. Ardmore Ave., LLC v. Cnty. of L. A.public domain
Corrigan, J. *324 Here we consider whether the County of Los Angeles can impose a documentary transfer tax on a written instrument that transfers beneficial ownership of real property from one person to two others. We hold that the tax may be imposed if the document reflects a sale: that i
Abrahamyan v. Gonzalezpublic domain
MEMORANDUM *** Arsen Abrahamyan, a native and citizen of Armenia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) summary affirmance of an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. Where the BIA affirms an IJ’s order without opinion, we review
Miguel Angel Ortiz Jr. v. Statepublic domain
NUMBER 13-14-00427-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG MIGUEL ANGEL ORTIZ, JR., Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. On appeal from the 389th District Court of Hidalgo Count
Gonzalez v. Ashcroftpublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** Cesar Ponce Gonzalez and his wife Julia Aquino, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order affirming without opinion an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying their application for cancellation of removal. Petitioners contend that the IJ erred in finding that Ponce-Gonzalez was ineligible for cancellation of removal
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY A. The Brady List In late 2016, the Association counted among its members approximately 7,800 deputy sheriffs. The Department sent a letter to roughly 300 of those deputies, informing them that a review of "individual employees' personnel records" had "identified potential exculpatory or impeachment
By the Court, DOUGLAS, C.J.: In this original petition for extraordinary relief, we consider whether documents disclosed to third parties constitute waiver of the work-product privilege. In considering this petition, we adopt the common interest rule that allows attorneys to share work product with third parties that have common interest in litigation without waiving the work-product privilege. Petitioner shared assertedly work-pr
Gonzalez v. Herrerapublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT LEON ABEL GONZALEZ, No. 24-2371 Petitioner - Appellant, D.C. No. 2:23-cv-10554- v. DSF JUAN HERRERA, Bureau of Prisons Residential Reentry Manager for Long OPINION Beach, in his official capacity; COLETTE S. PETERS, AKA C. Peters, Director of the Federal Bureau
Tempur-Pedic Int'l Inc. v. Angel Beds LLCpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER VANESSA D. GILMORE, District Judge. Pending before the Court is Defendants Angel Beds, LLC, the Merrick Group, LLC, the Merrick Group Capital 1, LTD, and Philip A. Krim’s (“Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss and Motion for a More Definite Statement (Instrument No. 9). After a careful review of the pleadings; the motion, responses, and replies; the record; and the app