Cases

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

OPINION HERSCHEL P. FRANKS, Special Justice. Plaintiffs’ suit to enjoin the commissioner from collecting taxes assessed upon plaintiffs’ businesses for the sale of alcoholic beverages was dismissed by the trial court. The judge held he was without subject matter jurisdiction,1 but issued an order enjoining the commissioner from forcing payment of the taxes pending this appeal.

*1239CORRECTED1 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER RE FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 106) RE DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS (Doc. 89) Lawrence J. O’NEILL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE a. The Constitutional Right at Issue. Although it is beyond dispute that Plaintiffs have a constituti

716 S.E.2d 61 (2011) STATE of North Carolina v. Antonio Lee JACKSON and Rodrico Lewis Jackson. No. COA10-1566. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. September 6, 2011. *63 Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Angel E. Gray, Assistant Attorney General, and June S. Ferrell, Assistant Attorney General, for the State. James W. Carte

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CHARLIE DAVID JACKSON, No. 15-15547 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 3:12-cv-02516- CRB R. FONG; K. FREIHA; P. BURTON, Defendants-Appellees. OPINION Appea

729 F.Supp.2d 1165 (2010) Stephen JACKSON Jr., aka Stephen Jackson, aka Khidr Omowale, Petitioner, v. Tom FELKER, Respondent. Case No. CV 07-3982-GAF(RC). United States District Court, C.D. California. July 23, 2010. *1168 Stephen Jackson, Susanville, CA, pro se. John Yang, CAAG-Office of Attorney General of California, Lo

MEMORANDUM ** California prisoner Raymond D. Jackson, Sr. appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that defendants violated his constitutional rights by refusing to search for and provide potentially exculpatory DNA evidence. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Kirtley v. Rainey, 326 F.3d 1088, 1092 (9th Cir.2003).

Proceedings: Order re: Pretrial Motions (Dkt. Nos. 72, 77-85) (IN CHAMBERS) The Honorable JESUS G. BERNAL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court are five motions in limine filed by Plaintiff Robert Jackson III, (Dkt. Nos. 81-85); four motions in li-mine filed by Defendants Bannes and the County of San Bernardino, (Dkt. Nos. 77-80); and a'motion to facilitate jury selection through written question

MEMORANDUM ** California prisoner Raymond D. Jackson, Sr. appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that defendants violated his constitutional rights by refusing to search for and provide potentially exculpatory DNA evidence. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Kirtley v. Rainey, 326 F.3d 1088, 1092 (9th Cir.2003).

*378 Motion to Strike; Summary Judgment; Credibility; Reliability; Genuine Issue of Material Fact; Rule 56(c). ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO STRIKE DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT WILLIAMS, Judge. This matter comes bef

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 13-50215 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 2:12-cr-00510-PSG-1 DEONDRAE JACKSON, Defendant-Appellant. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Philip S. Gutierrez, District J

Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.

MEMORANDUM ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL RON CLARK, District Judge. Petitioner David Lee Jackson was convicted of murder and the use of a dangerous weapon to commit murder, in violation of federal law, and sentenced to death. His conviction and sentence were affirmed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, and the Supreme Court denied Mr. Jackson’s petiti

Justice GINSBURG delivered the opinion of the Court. *586 Under the Bankruptcy Code, filing a petition for bankruptcy automatically "operates as a stay" of creditors' debt-collection efforts outside the umbrella of the bankruptcy case.

MEMORANDUM ** Arthur Duane Jackson appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that defendants violated his Fourteenth Amendment due process rights by denying him postconviction discovery of potentially exculpatory evidence. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo an order granting a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim

MEMORANDUM ** Arthur Duane Jackson appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that defendants violated his Fourteenth Amendment due process rights by denying him postconviction discovery of potentially exculpatory evidence. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo an order granting a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim

ORDER AMENDING We grant appellee’s request to take judicial notice of the California State Bar Association records involving Walter J. Roberts IV. We deny as unnecessary the request to take judicial notice of the motions filed with the district court. Judge Graber votes to grant the petition for panel rehearing in full. Judges B. Fletcher and Pregerson vote to grant the petition for panel rehearing in part, to the

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. # 27) ANTHONY W. ISHII, Senior District Judge. This is an action in diversity for damages arising from the termination of the employment of plaintiff Marcella Jackson (“Plaintiff’) by her employer Kaplan Higher Education, LLC, et al. (“Defendant” or “Kaplan Higher Education Corporation” (“KHEC”)). Plaintiffs action was remove

MEMORANDUM ** David Jackson appeals from the six-month sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Jackson’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental bri

MEMORANDUM ** David Jackson appeals from the six-month sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Jackson’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental bri