Cases

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA 2023 Fall Term FILED _____________________ December 8, 2023 released at 3:00 p.m. No. 22-ICA-208 EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK INTE

Liu, J. *164 The Automobile Sales Finance Act (ASFA), also known as the Rees-Levering Motor Vehicle Sales and Finance Act (Civ. Code, § 2981 et seq. ) is a consumer protection statute that governs the sale of vehicles where the buyer finances all or part of the car's purchase price. We gra

CORMAC J. CARNEY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE I. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND On November 8, 2018, Plaintiffs Kevin Sabicer and Marilyn Sabicer filed this action in Los Angeles County Superior Court against Defendants Ford Motor Company ("Ford"), Santa Margarita Ford, and Does 1 through 10. (Dkt. 1-2 [Complaint, hereinafter "Compl."].) On January 22, 2012, Plaintiffs purchased a 2011 Ford F-150 ("th

COLLINS, J. *266Plaintiffs Marline Petitpas1 and Joseph Petitpas sued Ford Motor Company, Exxon Mobil Corporation, Rossmoor Corporation,2 and others, alleging that exposure to asbestos caused by these defendants resulted in Marline's mesothelioma. Motions for summary adjudication were g

EDWARD M. CHEN, United States District Judge Plaintiffs allege that Ford manufactured vehicles with defective door latches which permit the door sensors to become contaminated over time, and thus to falsely signal that a door is not closed when in fact it is, posing a variety of safety risks. Plaintiffs bring causes of action for breach of express and implied warranty and under consumer fraud laws for failure to disclose a material

KRAUSE, Circuit Judge. Problematic as a lemon of a vehicle may be, the problem becomes more complex when it is peeling. This appeal involves a putative consumer class action seeking damages resulting from the delamination, i.e., peeling and flaking, of the lining of certain Ford truck fuel tanks between 2001 and 2010-a problem that plagued numerous Ford F-Series and E-Series vehicles i

KRAUSE, Circuit Judge. Problematic as a lemon of a vehicle may be, the problem becomes more complex when it is peeling. This appeal involves a putative consumer class action seeking damages resulting from the delamination, i.e., peeling and flaking, of the lining of certain Ford truck fuel tanks between 2001 and 2010-a problem that plagued numerous Ford F-Series and E-Series vehicles i

PER CURIAM. We grant the motion for rehearing, withdraw our opinion and judgment of June 20, 2014, and substitute the following opinion and corresponding judgment. At issue in this appeal is the legal sufficiency of circumstantial evidence. A jury determined that a settlement agreement was procured by fraud, and the trial court rendered judgment setting the agreement aside. The court of appeals, however, rev

590 F.3d 782 (2009) Richard Herman FORD, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Cheryl PLILER, Warden, Respondent-Appellant. No. 06-56092. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 9, 2009. Filed December 30, 2009. *783 Lisa M. Bassis, Beverly Hills, CA, for the petitioner. Paul M. Roadarm

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES JON S. TIGAR, United States District Judge Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Attorneys’ Fees. ECF No. 69. For the reasons set forth below, the Court will grant the motion. I. BACKGROUND A. Parties and Claims Plaintiffs Jean MacDonald, Veronica Aguirre, and Brian Barbee bring this puta

WELCH, J., dissenting. 1¶1 respectfully disagree with the majority opinion herein to reverse the judgment of the trial court. I believe that the decision of the DHH was arbitrary and capricious and that the decision of the ALJ was correct.1 Therefore, I would affirm the judgment of the trial court reversing DHH’s denial of the application of the Clinic and ordering DHH to grant th

Matter of Angel L. (Angel L.) (2025 NY Slip Op 00865) Matter of Angel L. (Angel L.) 2025 NY Slip Op 00865 Decided on February 13, 2025 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judici

Matter of Angel L. (Angel L.) (2025 NY Slip Op 00864) Matter of Angel L. (Angel L.) 2025 NY Slip Op 00864 Decided on February 13, 2025 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judici

ORDER GRANTING IN PART, DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS Re: ECF No. 28 JON S. TIGAR, United States District Judge In this action for breach of implied warranty, violations of California’s Unfair Competition Law, and related claims, Defendant Ford Motor . Company moves to dismiss each of Plaintiffs’ claims for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. For

In re John Ford D/B/A The Clinic at Villas at Angel Point; — Plaintiff; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court Div. D, No. 625888-D; to the *265Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2014 CA 1262. Denied.

MEMORANDUM ** Martha Pulido-Ford, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision finding her removable for participating in alien smuggling, and ineligible for relief from removal. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo claims of due process in immigration proceedi

MEMORANDUM ** Martha Pulido-Ford, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision finding her removable for participating in alien smuggling, and ineligible for relief from removal. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo claims of due process in immigration proceedi

MEMORANDUM *** The facts and procedural history of this case are familiar to the parties and we do not repeat them here. Jenny Ford argues the district court erred by: (1) denying her the ability to conduct discovery of possible Plan conflicts of interest and (2) affirming the Plan Administrator’s denial of severance benefits under Motorola’s Involuntary Severance Plan (“the Plan”). Becaus

Angel v Strulovich (2025 NY Slip Op 04150) Angel v Strulovich 2025 NY Slip Op 04150 Decided on July 16, 2025 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is unc

Angel v Strulovich (2025 NY Slip Op 04149) Angel v Strulovich 2025 NY Slip Op 04149 Decided on July 16, 2025 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is unc