Cases

299 S.W.3d 843 (2009) Richard FLORES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. 08-07-00330-CR. Court of Appeals of Texas, El Paso. October 28, 2009. Rehearing Overruled January 13, 2010. *847 Ruben P. Morales, El Paso, TX, for Appellant. Jaime E. Esparza, District Attorney, El Paso, TX, for State.</

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS RICHARD FLORES, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. §

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS RICHARD FLORES, § No. 08-07-00330-CR Appellant, § Appeal from the v. §

84 S.W.3d 675 (2002) Robert FLORES, Jr., Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. 01-01-00390-CR. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (1st Dist.). March 21, 2002. Rehearing Overruled July 25, 2002. *677 Lewis Dickson, DeGuerin & Dickson, Houston, for Appellant. Calvin Hartmann, Asst. Dist. Atty.,

776 F.Supp. 61 (1991) Iris Velia RIVERA FLORES, Plaintiff, v. PUERTO RICO TELEPHONE COMPANY, Defendant. Civ. No. 89-1697 HL. United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. September 5, 1991. *62 Guillermo J. Ramos-Luina, Hato Rey, P.R., for plaintiff. Rogelio Capestany-Morales, San Juan, P.R., for defendant.

332 F.3d 1255 Iris MENA, Plaintiff-Appellee, andJose E. Mena, Plaintiff,v.CITY OF SIMI VALLEY; Randy G. Adams; Marvin Hodges; Roy Jones; Vincent Allegra; Alan McCord; Richard Thomas; Ronald Chambers; WilliamLappin; Arnold Baynard; Jeffrey Dominick; Jack Greenburg; Richard Lamb; Frank Ahlvers; John Adamczyk; Tim Brown, Defendants, andDarin L. Muehler; Robert Brill, Defendants-Appellants. No. 01-56673.

OPINION AND ORDER JOHN G. KOELTL, District Judge: The advent of new technologies in the field of biometrics—the field of science relating to the identification of, humans based upon unique biological traits, such as fingerprints, DNA, and retinas—has produced new ways of conducting commercial transactions. In 2008, to promote, regulate, and safeguard the use of biometrics in financial transactions, Illinois

ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV

Filed 12/15/20 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR MARIA GARCIA, B301929 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC718221) v. KND DEVELOPMENT 52, LLC, et al., Defendants and Appellants. APPEAL from a

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 22-1377 JOSE A. RIVERA-PINA; DENISE MALAVE-FONSECA; ELIZABETH BRUNO-ORTEGA; EUNICE A. ROSARIO-ABREU; GUILLERMO E. DE LA CRUZ-ABREU; IRIS N. FLORES-CARABALLO; JAVIER RODRIGUEZ-RODRIGUEZ; JUAN C. ROMANACCE-RODRIGUEZ; LISBETH DE LEON-MARQUEZ; LUZ J. GARCIA-ORTIZ; MARISELA FIGUEROA-VEGA; RICHARD RIVERA-CANALES; ROLANDO A. LOPEZ-SOSA; RUBEN RODRIGUEZ-JIMENEZ; HOWARD DE LEON-ROD

Mr. Justice de Jesús delivered the opinion of the Court. On November 25, 1937, Ernesto Flores Rodríguez and his wife Amada Bulls mortgaged an urban property to secure two notes to bearer for $2,500 each, maturing on November 25,1939. The mortgage was recorded in the Registry of Property. On June 22, 1938, Amada Bulls died intestate and her children Ana Nereida, Pedro Ernesto, Nora Catalin

BROWNING, Circuit Judge, dissenting. The facts are simple. The Shaars were granted voluntary departure. During their period for voluntary departure, they became eligible for suspension of deportation and filed motions to reopen requesting such relief.1 The immigration judge had not decided the motions when the period for voluntary departure expired, and petitioners did not depart.

ACCEPTED 03-14-00725-CV 4956355 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

ACCEPTED 01-14-00870-cv FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 4/8/2015 12:33:22 PM CHRISTOPHER PRINE

ACCEPTED 15-25-00013-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 12:26 PM No. 15-25-00013-CV

KAYATTA, Circuit Judge. Luis Yoel Díaz-Rosado (“Díaz”) was convicted of carjacking under 18 U.S.C. § 2119. On appeal, he challenges the sufficiency of the evidence on the issue of intent, the admission of an alleged confession, the rejection of a proposed supplemental jury instruction, and the admission of an in-court witness identification. For the following reasons, we affirm. I. Background

ACCEPTED 12-15-00216-CV TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 10/9/2015 2

USCA1 Opinion Not for Publication in West's Federal Reporter Citation Limited Pursuant to lst Cir. Loc. R. 32.3 United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

647 F.Supp.2d 103 (2009) WATCHTOWER BIBLE TRACT SOCIETY OF NEW YORK, INC., et al., Plaintiffs v. Roberto SÁNCHEZ-RAMOS, et al., Defendants. Civil No. 04-1452 (JP). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. August 10, 2009. *107 Nora Vargas-Acosta, San Juan, PR, Paul D. Polidoro, Patterson, NY, for Plaintiffs. Luis A. R

management of his finances. Albert created GWB Trust into which any interest he may have held in the Estate could be funneled. He then created Renhaw, Inc., and Pentex FILED IN Royalty Trust, 6th COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS int