⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Angel A Rosell”

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2024-06-26 · Published · cited 1× · 105 F.4th 1346
USCA11 Case: 22-11873 Document: 75-1 Date Filed: 06/26/2024 Page: 1 of 24 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-11873 ____________________ In re: JANUARY 2021 SHORT SQUEEZE TRADING LITIGATION,
Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso) · 2023-05-30 · Published · cited 0×
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS GILBERT ARCIDES, § No. 08-22-00046-CV Appellant, § Appeal from the v. § 143rd Judicial District Court RAUL ANGEL ROJAS AND DEEPWELL §
Sanchis v. Rosellpublic domain
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990-11-06 · Published · cited 0× · 569 So. 2d 833; 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8491; 1990 WL 169462
PER CURIAM. In 1986, Juan Angel Regojo asked his father-in-law, the appellee Daniel Bacardi Rosell [Bacardi], to make a loan to his friend, the appellant, Jose A. Sanchis, to help Sanchis and his family start a business. Bacardi loaned Sanchis $50,000 in several payments. In Sanchis’s deposition, he admits that dates for repayment were discussed. “We had dates but dates which could be modified. I remember
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2008-03-12 · Published · cited 5× · 978 So. 2d 576; 2008 WL 650410
978 So.2d 576 (2008) Mickel BRIEN, Plaintiff-Appellee v. LEON ANGEL CONSTRUCTORS, INC., and Bridgefield Casualty Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellant. No. 42,904-WCA. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit. March 12, 2008. *578 The Smith Law Office, L.L.C., by Linda Lea Smith, Eskridge E. Smith, Jr., Bossier City, for App
Rosell v. Escopublic domain
Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1989-09-12 · Published · cited 5673× · 549 So. 2d 840; 1989 WL 105105
549 So.2d 840 (1989) June ROSELL v. ESCO, d/b/a Jolly Elevator Corp., et al. No. 89-C-0607. Supreme Court of Louisiana. September 12, 1989. *842 Samuel C. Gainsburgh and Nick F. Noriea, Jr., Gainsburgh, Benjamin, Fallon, David & Ates, New Orleans, for applicant. John E. McAuliffe, Jr., Bienvenu, Foster, Ryan & O'Ba
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District · 2005-02-10 · Published · cited 0×
NUMBER 13-03-310-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2003-01-22 · Published · cited 5× · 814 A.2d 642; 357 N.J. Super. 132; 2003 N.J. Super. LEXIS 28
814 A.2d 642 (2003) 357 N.J.Super 132 KELLAM ASSOCIATES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ANGEL PROJECTS, LLC, and Intrawest, d/a/b/ Mountain Creek, Defendants-Respondents. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Submitted December 11, 2002. Decided January 22, 2003. *643 Cuyler Burk, for appellant
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948-12-13 · Published · cited 0× · 171 F.2d 295
PER CURIAM. Judgment of district court affirmed pursuant to stipulation.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1946-07-15 · Published · cited 0× · 156 F.2d 371; 1946 U.S. App. LEXIS 2582
PER CURIAM. Judgment of the district court reversed and remanded on authority of opinion in Bratt et al. v. Western Air Lines, Inc., 10 Cir., 155 F.2d 850.
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2014-11-17 · Published · cited 29× · 520 B.R. 399; 2014 Bankr. LEXIS 4748; 60 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 90; 2014 WL 6152761
Chapter 15 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW GRANTING PETITION FOR RECOGNITION AS FOREIGN MAIN PROCEEDING AND DENYING CROSS-MOTION TO CHANGE VENUE STUART M. BERNSTEIN UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE: Suntech Power Holdings Co. Ltd. (the “Debtor”) is a debtor in a provisional liquidation pending in the Cayman Islands (the “Foreign Proceeding”). David Walker and Ian Stokoe, the Join
United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 2013-06-04 · Published · cited 0× · 494 B.R. 466; 2013 WL 2398037; 2013 Bankr. LEXIS 2276; 58 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 9
ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OPINION ON OBJECTION TO PROOF OF CLAIM NO. 520-1 [DOCKET NO. 1383] CLAIM OBJECTION FILED: MARCH 29, 2013 AS DK. NO. 1383. SCOTT C. CLARKSON, Bankruptcy Judge. Before the Court is an Objection to Claim of South Motors Suzuki, Inc. (Proof of Claim No. 520-1 the) (the “Claim Objection”) arising from damages resulting from the Debtor’s rejection of an executory automobile
Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1973-05-04 · Published · cited 7× · 101 P.R. Dec. 329
*330Opinión disidente del Juez Asociado Señor Cadilla Ginorio con la cual concurren el Juez Presidente Señor Pérez Pimentel y los Jueces Asociados Señores Martín e Irizarry Yunqué. San Juan, Puerto Rico, a 25 de octubre de 1973 Disiento de la sentencia dictada por este Tribunal en el presente
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2004-04-29 · Published · cited 0×
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-03-00241-CV Laura Ramirez and Adolfo Ramirez/Fifth Club, Inc.<
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2004-04-29 · Published · cited 0×
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-03-00241-CV Laura Ramirez and Adolfo Ramirez/Fifth Club, Inc. and David A. West, Appellants v. Fifth Club, Inc.; David A. West; and Luis a/k/a Louis Medrano/ Roberto Ramirez, Appellees FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 3
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004-12-21 · Published · cited 220× · 392 F.3d 609; 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 26539; 2004 WL 2937707
GREENBERG, Circuit Judge. This matter comes on before this court on Robert V. Baer’s (“Baer”) appeal from an order of the district court entered February 20, 2004, granting summary judgment to the defendants, David Chase and DC Enterprises, Inc. (together called “Chase”), pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(c). This dispute centers on the creation and development of t
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2018-09-26 · Published · cited 0× · 256 So. 3d 336
PERRET, Judge. In this workers' compensation case, plaintiff/employee, Bea Angelle, appeals the judgment of the Workers' Compensation Judge ("WCJ") finding that she is not entitled to supplemental earnings benefits ("SEBs"). For the following reasons, we affirm. Facts and Procedural History: On November 3, 2011, Ms. Angelle was hired as a police officer by defendant/employer, the Ci
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013-12-12 · Published · cited 0× · 4 F. Supp. 3d 1005; 28 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1859; 2013 WL 6508070; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 173730; 15 Accom. Disabilities Dec. (CCH) 15
Memorandum Opinion and Order Honorable Edmond E. Chang, United States District Judge Plaintiff Denise Luster-Malone brought this disability-discrimination action against *1007Defendant Cook County.1 Luster-Malone worked for the County at Stroger Hospital from 1984 to 2009, when she was fired, according to the County
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006-12-21 · Published · cited 0× · 214 F. App'x 696
MEMORANDUM ** This is a petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ January 11, 2006 *697decision, denying petitioner’s motion to reopen. Respondent’s motion to dismiss this petition for lack of jurisdiction is denied. See Ray v. Gonzales, 439 F.3d 582, 583 (9th Cir.2006) Respondent’s motio
California Court of Appeal · 2023-01-12 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 1/12/23 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT THE PEOPLE, No. H049188 (Santa Cruz Petitioner, Super. Ct. No. 19CR06615) v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SANTA CRUZ COUNTY, Respondent; JASON JOEL CORTEZ,
Marroy v. Hertzakpublic domain
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2011-09-14 · Published · cited 1× · 77 So. 3d 307; 2011 La.App. 1 Cir. 0403; 2011 La. App. LEXIS 1037; 2011 WL 4484598
McCLENDON, J. Un this medical malpractice case, the plaintiff, Angele D. Marroy, individually and as the administrator of the estate of her minor child, Collin Andrew Marroy, appeals from the judgments of the trial court following a jury verdict that rejected her claim against the defendant, Peter H. *309Hertzak, M.D., and denied her motion for judgment notwithstandin