Cases

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1198 Doc: 94 Filed: 02/22/2023 Pg: 1 of 44 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 22-1198 DON BLANKENSHIP, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. NBCUNIVERSAL, LLC; CNBC, LLC, Defendant

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1326 Doc: 44 Filed: 02/22/2023 Pg: 1 of 44 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 22-1198 DON BLANKENSHIP, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. NBCUNIVERSAL, LLC; CNBC, LLC, Defendant

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1207 Doc: 113 Filed: 02/22/2023 Pg: 1 of 44 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 22-1198 DON BLANKENSHIP, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. NBCUNIVERSAL, LLC; CNBC, LLC, Defendan

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JAMES HUNTSMAN, No. 21-56056 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:21-cv-02504- v. SVW-SK CORPORATION OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE CHURCH OF OPINION JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States Di

NORMAN K. MOON, SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiff Brennan Gilmore was among hundreds of individuals who gathered in *642Charlottesville, Virginia on August 12, 2017 to protest various white supremacist and neo-Nazi groups participating in the "Unite the Right" rally. As Gilmore recorded footage of protestors that afternoon, he captu

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER BRIAN M. COGAN, District Judge. Table of Contents INTRODUCTION.. to to 00 EVIDENCE AT TRIAL. to to to I. Plaintiffs’ Case.299 II. Defendant’s Case.305 STANDARD OF REVIEW.310 DISCUSSION.310

Case: 19-60632 Document: 00516445896 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/24/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED August 24, 2022

22-2908(L) Antonyuk v. James UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT ____________________ August Term, 2022 Argued: March 20, 2023 Decided: December 8, 2023 Remanded by S. Ct.: June 21, 2024 Decided on Remand: October 24, 2024 Docket Nos. 22-2908(L), 22-2972(Con) ____________________ IV

USCA11 Case: 19-13694 Date Filed: 05/06/2021 Page: 1 of 67 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 19-13694 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 1:17-cv-24045-FAM MR. EDDIE I. SIERRA,

Case: 25-10534 Document: 195 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/02/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED September 2, 2025

MEMORANDUM OPINION Paul W. Grimm, United States District Judge The litigation history between the Intellectual Ventures companies (Plaintiffs, Counter-Defendants, Third-Party Defendants, and Joined Counter-Defendants to this action;, collectively referred to as “IV”) and the Capital One companies (Defendants, Counterclaimants, and Third-Party Plaintiffs' in this action; co

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2009 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

198 F.Supp.2d 1080 (2001) Randolph WILKINS Plaintiff, v. ST. LOUIS HOUSING AUTHORITY, Defendant. No. 4:00CV793 DDN. United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division. December 28, 2001. *1081 *1082 William E. Moench, William E. Moench Law Offices, St. Louis, MO, for Plaintiff.

HONORABLE KAREN NELSON MOORE, United States Circuit Judge, HONORABLE TIMOTHY S. BLACK, United States District Judge, HONORABLE MICHAEL H. WATSON, United States District Judge *992TABLE OF CONTENTS I. BACKGROUND...994 A. General Overview of the Facts...994 B. Procedural History...1009 II

Plurality Opinion by BELL, C.J., which WILNER and CATHELL, JJ., join. This case is the first of two pertaining to the eligibility requirements of a candidate for the office of the Attorney General of Maryland.1 The genesis of this case was the attempt by Mr. Thomas E. Perez (“Perez”), an attorney and law professor, one of the appellees, to run for the office

22-2908 (L); 22-2933; 22-2987; 22-3237 Antonyuk; Hardaway; Christian; Spencer v. Chiumento UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT ____________________ August Term, 2022 Argued: March 20, 2023 Decided: December 8, 2023 Docket Nos. 22-2908 (L), 22-2972 (Con); 22-2933; 22-2987; 22-3237 ______________

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT VIRGINIA DUNCAN; RICHARD LEWIS; No. 19-55376 PATRICK LOVETTE; DAVID MARGUGLIO; CHRISTOPHER D.C. No. WADDELL; CALIFORNIA RIFLE & 3:17-cv-01017- PISTOL ASSOCIATION, INC., a BEN-JLB California corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellees, OPINION v. ROB BONTA, in his offic

[J-65-2022] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT TODD, C.J., DONOHUE, DOUGHERTY, WECHT, MUNDY, BROBSON, JJ. ALLEGHENY REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH : No. 26 MAP 2021 CENTER, ALLENTOWN WOMEN'S : CENTER, DELAWARE COUNTY : Appeal from the Orders of the WOMEN'S CENTER, PHILADELPHIA : Commonwealth Court at No. 26 MD WOMEN'S CENTER, PLANNED : 2019 dated January 28, 2020, and PAREN

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT VIRGINIA DUNCAN; RICHARD LEWIS; No. 19-55376 PATRICK LOVETTE; DAVID MARGUGLIO; CHRISTOPHER D.C. No. WADDELL; CALIFORNIA RIFLE & 3:17-cv-01017- PISTOL ASSOCIATION, INC., a BEN-JLB California corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellees, OPINION v. ROB BONTA, in his offic

MEMORANDUM OPINION TUCKER, Chief Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission and Indiana Carpenters Welfare Fund (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) bring this putative class action suit alleging that off-label prescription payments made by Plaintiffs to Defendant Cephalon, Inc. (“Cephalon”) were excessive and constituted unjust enrichment. Plaintiffs are entities, called third