Cases

Affirmed.

PER CURIAM: Anthony Andrews appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), action and his motions for reconsideration pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) and 60(b). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See And

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.

PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See Falcon v. State, 111 So.3d 973 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013) (reaffirming holding in Gonzalez v. State, 101 So.3d 886 *983(Fla. 1st DCA 2012), that Miller v. Alabama, — U.S. —, 132 S.Ct. 2455, 183 L.Ed.2d 407 (2012) did not apply retroactively to defendant’s postconviction motion, and certifying question

PER CURIAM: Daniel H. King, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petitions. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. King v. Andrews, Nos. 5:12-hc-02259-FL; 5:12-hc-02271-FL; 5:12-hc-02288-FL, 2014 WL 880893 (E.D.N.

BENTON, J. Gregory Andrews, who the state alleged was born on January 11, 1963, appeals his conviction for solicitation of a child under the age of sixteen (J.M.) to commit a lewd or lascivious act in violation of section 800.04(6)(a) and (b), Florida Statutes (2012), arguing that the evidence was insufficient to prove the crime. We affirm. The jury heard evidence of a sleepover at J.M.’s (female) friend’

JULIA SMITH GIBBONS, Circuit Judge. OPINION After being indicted on drug, robbery, and gun charges, Dominick Andrews sought to have his indictment dismissed on the grounds that the arresting federal agents had engaged in outrageous conduct. When the district court denied his motion to dismiss, Andrews entered into a plea agreement under which he would pl

JOHN D. BATES, United States District Judge Andrew Moore, a former employee of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development ("HUD"), is an African-American man over sixty-seven years old. He alleges that while he was employed at HUD, the agency took adverse employment actions against him because of his race, sex, and age and in retaliation for filing a complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC"). The

BAILEY, J., Concurs. PYLE, J., Concurs.

-------- N. MARK KLAPPENBACH, Judge *918Carolyn Moore and Randall Sullivan filed a will contest alleging that their father, Charles Sullivan, lacked testamentary capacity to execute his will dated March 24, 2009. The Faulkner County Circuit Court found that the will was valid and denied the petition. Moore now appeals, and we affirm.

HARTZ, Circuit Judge. This appeal presents the question whether clearly established law supports the claim of Plaintiff Joseph Leiser that two jail officials in Coffey County, Kansas, violated his constitutional rights by disclosing medical information about him that they had properly obtained. While Plaintiff was incarcerated in an Illinois jail awaiting extradition to Coffey County, t

Mark D. Pfeiffer, Judge Mr. Bryán Andrew Moore (“Husband”) appeals from the Judgment of the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri (“trial court”), in favor of Ms. Jennifer Erin Moore (“Wife”), compelling enforcement of an underlying divorce decree relating to division of Husband’s military retired pay. We affirm. Facts and Procedural History

Lovorice Quindale Andrews was indicted on two counts of robbery in the first degree, *Page 729 violations of § 13A-3-41, Ala. Code 1975. After initially entering not-guilty pleas to both charges, Andrews entered into an agreement with the Coffee County District Attorney's Office as to one of the robbery counts, pursuant to which he would plead guilty to one count of first-degree assault, a violation of § 13A-6-20

W.E. Andrews, A Div. of Moore Wallace N. Am., Inc. v. 1 Cornell, Inc., No. 278-5-08 Wmcv (Wesley, J., Apr. 5, 2011) [The text of this Vermont trial court opinion is unofficial. It has been reformatted from the original. The accuracy of the text and the accompanying data included in the Vermont trial court opinion database is not guaranteed.] STATE OF VERMONT SUPERIOR COURT W.E. ANDREWS, A D

MEMORANDUM OPINION JOHN D. BATES United States. District Judge Andrew Moore, an African-American man over 62 years old, alleges that his *31 former > employer, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”), took dozens of adverse actions against him because of his

*529 ORDER PER CURIAM. Johnnie Moore (“Movant”) appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. In his two points on appeal, Movant argues the motion court clearly erred in denying his claims without an evidentiary hearing as his trial counsel was ineffective

ORDER Per Curiam: Mitchell Moore appeals the motion court’s decision to deny his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

MAINE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT Reporter of Decisions Decision: 2023 ME 18 Docket: Pen-21-350 Argued: June 6, 2022 Decided: February 28, 2023 Panel: STANFILL, C.J., and MEAD, JABAR, HORTON, CONNORS, and LAWRENCE JJ. STATE OF MAINE v. RAYSHAUN MOORE CONNORS, J. [¶1] Rayshaun M

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 8th of October 2015 in this *566matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 15th of

BRYAN, Justice. WRIT DENIED. NO OPINION. MOORE, C.J., and STUART, BOLIN, PARKER, MAIN, and WISE, JJ., eoncur. MURDOCK and SHAW, JJ., dissent.