Cases

PER CURIAM: Terrence Jacks appeals the district court’s order affirming the Administration Law Judge’s (“ALJ”) denial of his application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income, pursuant to *81642 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and 1383(c)(3), respectively. On appeal, Jacks argues that substantial evidence does not support the ALJ’s determination regardin

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Andrew Stewart appeals the judgment entered by the district court affirming the Commissioner’s decision to deny a period *295of disability, disability insurance benefits, and supplemental social security income

OPINION PER CURIAM. Deborah Raffinee, proceeding pro se, appeals from an order of the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania dismissing her complaint. We will affirm. Raffinee applied for disability insurance and supplemental security income benefits under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act (“Act”). Her request was granted by an administrative law j

OPINION PER CURIAM. Deborah Raffinee, proceeding pro se, appeals from an order of the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania dismissing her complaint. We will affirm. Raffinee applied for disability insurance and supplemental security income benefits under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act (“Act”). Her request was granted by an administrative law j

SUMMARY ORDER Plaintiff-appellant Paul Louis was granted disability insurance benefits by defendant-appellee Commissioner of Social Security, in a fully favorable decision issued by the Appeals Council on May 13, 2005, that found that plaintiff had been disabled since his claimed onset date of May 1, 1981. The Appeals Council mailed notice to plaintiff advising him that if he disagreed with the decision, he could seek judicial review

SUMMARY ORDER Plaintiff-appellant Ernest McGregor challenges a June 5, 2008 judgment of the District Court affirming the decision of defendant-appellee the Commissioner of Social Security to deny disability benefits to plaintiff. On appeal, plaintiff argues that (1) the finding of the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) that plaintiff was not disabled was not supported by substantial evidence; (2) plaintiff was deprived of a full and fai

SUMMARY ORDER Plaintiff-appellant Ernest McGregor challenges a June 5, 2008 judgment of the District Court affirming the decision of defendant-appellee the Commissioner of Social Security to deny disability benefits to plaintiff. On appeal, plaintiff argues that (1) the finding of the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) that plaintiff was not disabled was not supported by substantial evidence; (2) plaintiff was deprived of a full and fai

SUMMARY ORDER Richard J. Heller appeals from the judgment of the Northern District of New York (Kahn, J.) granting the Commissioner of Social Security’s motion to dismiss Heller’s challenge to his disability determination. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the factual and procedural history of this case, as well as the issues on appeal. We affirm. First, Heller’s brief, even read broadly, does not address the di

SUMMARY ORDER Plaintiff-appellant Paul Louis was granted disability insurance benefits by defendant-appellee Commissioner of Social Security, in a fully favorable decision issued by the Appeals Council on May 13, 2005, that found that plaintiff had been disabled since his claimed onset date of May 1, 1981. The Appeals Council mailed notice to plaintiff advising him that if he disagreed with the decision, he could seek judicial review

SUMMARY ORDER Richard J. Heller appeals from the judgment of the Northern District of New York (Kahn, J.) granting the Commissioner of Social Security’s motion to dismiss Heller’s challenge to his disability determination. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the factual and procedural history of this case, as well as the issues on appeal. We affirm. First, Heller’s brief, even read broadly, does not address the di

529 F.3d 198 (2008) Staci JOHNSON, Appellant v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY. No. 07-2132. United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. Submitted Pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a) April 17, 2008. Opinion Filed: April 22, 2008. *199 Jason L. Thompson, Leventhal, Sutton & Gornstein, Trevose, PA, for Ap

536 F.Supp.2d 403 (2008) Hermena GLADDEN, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. No. 06 Civ. 3671 (AJP). United States District Court, S.D. New York. February 29, 2008. *404 Hermena L. Gladden, Yonkers, NY, pro se. John E. Gura, Jr., U.S. Attorney's Office, Southern District of New York, New York, NY, fo

*636MEMORANDUM * Vincent Trulson appeals the district court’s dismissal of his case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, disputing whether the administrative law judge (ALJ) properly found his second application for disability benefits barred by the res judicata effect of a final decision on his first application. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S

*636MEMORANDUM * Vincent Trulson appeals the district court’s dismissal of his case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, disputing whether the administrative law judge (ALJ) properly found his second application for disability benefits barred by the res judicata effect of a final decision on his first application. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S

DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION FILED ON JANUARY 10, 2013; VACATING THE COMMISSIONER’S NON-DISABILITY FINDING; REMANDING PLAINTIFF’S CASE TO THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION UNDER SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) FOR PAYMENT OF CHILD’S SUPPLEMENTAL SECURITY INCOME CONSISTENT WITH THE SOCIAL SECURITY ACT, THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, AND THIS DECISION AND ENTRY; AND TERMINATING THE CASE ON THE DOCKET OF THIS COURT

PER CURIAM. Ronald W. Hodgson appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge to uphold the Commissioner’s decision denying Hodgson’s application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Hodgson v. C

166 F.Supp.2d 845 (2001) Theresa STIEBERGER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. No. 84 Civ. 1302(LBS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. September 24, 2001. Kathleen Kelleher, The Legal Aid Society, New York, NY, for Stieberger plaintiffs. Andrew M. Rothstein, Elmira, NY, for Plaintiff Reino Pyhtila. Terry M.

PER CURIAM. Emma L. Hand seeks review of the magistrate judge’s order * affirming the Commissioner’s denial of social security benefits pursuant to 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1520(f), 416.920(f) (2002). Our review of the record discloses that the Commissioner’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. In particular, we find that substantial evidence supports a finding th

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SHERRILLYN THEANELDA GRANT, Plaintiff, v. No. 21-cv-00526-ZMF KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff Sherrillyn Theanelda Grant moves for reversal of Defendant Commissioner of

HEANEY, Circuit Judge. Andrew Swope appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri affirming the decision of an administrative law judge (ALJ), on behalf of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (Commissioner). The ALJ found that Swope was not entitled to a period of disability insurance benefits nor eligible f