⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Andrew Mitchell Pruitt”

Pruitt v. Statepublic domain
Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2025-05-06 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION ONE DAVID LEE PRUITT, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. STATE OF ARIZONA, et al., Defendants/Appellees. No. 1 CA-CV 24-0418 FILED 05-06-2025 Appeal from the Superior Court in Maricopa County No. CV2021-053278 The Honora
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2023-08-17 · Published · cited 9× · 78 F.4th 661
USCA4 Appeal: 22-4284 Doc: 54 Filed: 08/17/2023 Pg: 1 of 29 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 22-4284 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. PATRICK VAUGHN MITCHELL, Def
District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2017-03-01 · Published · cited 3× · 240 F. Supp. 3d 951; 62 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1805; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68254; 2017 WL 1536277
ORDER BRIAN S. MILLER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiff Pharmaceutical Care Management Associations’s (PCMA) motion for summary judgment [Doc. No.'75] is granted in part and denied in part, and defendant Leslie Rutledge’s (State of Arkansas) motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 77] is granted in part and denied in part. The joint motions to extend time [Doc. Nos. 103,104] are denied as moot, and th
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018-06-08 · Published · cited 2× · 891 F.3d 1109
BEAM, Circuit Judge. *1111 In this dispute between a pharmacy trade association, Pharmaceutical Care Management Association (PCMA) and the State of Arkansas, PCMA appeals the district court's ruling that an Arkansas state statute is not preempted by Medicare Part D, 42 U.S.C. § 1395w-26
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997-10-09 · Published · cited 113× · 120 F.3d 965
120 F.3d 965 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5742, 97 Daily JournalD.A.R. 9229Jimmy LISTON; Venice Liston; Danny Liston; Andrew Liston;Elishia Liston, minors, by and through theirGuardian ad Litem, Jim Liston,Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross-Appellees,v.COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, a political subdivision of the State ofCalifornia; David Pike; D. Podkowa, Defendants-Appellees,andPaul Amicone, Police Officer; Bart Belknap, D
District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 2009-05-11 · Published · cited 6× · 613 F. Supp. 2d 1056; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42528; 2009 WL 1312905
613 F.Supp.2d 1056 (2009) Bettye FIELDS, Plaintiff v. WYETH, INC. d/b/a Wyeth; Schwarz Pharma, Inc.; and Teva Pharmaceutical, Inc., Defendants. Case No. 08-2079. United States District Court, W.D. Arkansas, Fort Smith Division. May 11, 2009. *1057 Daniel J. McGlynn, McGlynn & Glisson APLC, Baton Rouge, LA, George R. Wise, Jr.
Mitchell v. Jonespublic domain
Court of Appeals of Texas · 1985-03-21 · Published · cited 2× · 694 S.W.2d 61
OPINION This is an appeal from a summary judgment granted in favor of the appellee on grounds that appellant's cause of action under breach of oral contract is barred by the Statute of Frauds and Statute of Limitations, and his suit under the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act is barred by the Statute of Limitations. We reverse and remand. Appellee failed to meet his burden of proving that no genuine issue of material fact exists and that he is entitled to judgment a
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2017-02-07 · Published · cited 0× · 396 P.3d 861; 2017 OK CIV APP 34; 2017 WL 2672539; 2017 Okla. Civ. App. LEXIS 14
JOHN F. FISCHER, PRESIDING JUDGE: ¶ 1 Crawford and Company appeals a judgment entered on a jury verdict in favor of Kenneth L. Bruñe. Bruñe was hired to defend an insured in a personal injury action pursuant to an insurance policy issued by American Transport Insurance Company. Bruñe was contacted by Crawford as the agent and third-party administrator for American. When American
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2005-05-13 · Published · cited 0× · 395 F. Supp. 2d 709; 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9270; 2005 WL 1185816
395 F.Supp.2d 709 (2005) DEXIA CREDIT LOCAL, f/k/a Dexia Public Finance Bank and Credit Local de France, Plaintiff, v. Peter ROGAN, et al., Defendant. No. 02 C 8288. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. May 13, 2005. *710 *711 Scott T. Mendeloff, Colleen M. Kenney, Co
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013-06-27 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT OFFICE OF THE CLERK Byron White United States Courthouse 1823 Stout Street Denver, Colorado 80257 (303) 844-3157 Elisabeth A. Shumaker Douglas E. Cressler Clerk of Cou
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017-02-22 · Published · cited 0× · 849 F.3d 861; 2017 WL 694481
FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit February 22, 2017 PUBLISH Elisabeth A. Shumaker Cle
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2005-05-31 · Published · cited 1× · 231 F.R.D. 287; 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23315; 2005 WL 2482560
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER SCHENKIER, United States Magistrate Judge. In this opinion concerning discovery disputes, our fourth to date in this case,1 we address Dexia’s motion to compel production *289of documents from defendants Braddock Management LP, Brainbridge Management LP, Bainbridge Management, Inc
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017-02-22 · Published · cited 1× · 875 F.3d 505
ORDER These matters are before the court on the separate Petitions for Rehearing En Banc filed by Intervenors Northern Arapaho Tribe and Eastern Shoshone Tribe. We also have responses to the petitions from the State of Wyoming and the Wyoming Farm Bureau Federation. Upon consideration, the petitions were circulated to all the judges of the court who are in regular active service and who are not recused. S
Missouri Court of Appeals · 2012-06-19 · Published · cited 21× · 368 S.W.3d 327; 2012 WL 2285193; 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 842
KAREN KING MITCHELL, Presiding Judge. This is an insurance case addressing the applicability of two policies of health insurance. The primary issue as to the Golden Rule Insurance Company policy is whether a policy application’s automatic termination clause was rendered ambiguous, and thus unenforceable, by other language in the policy. We hold that the automatic termination clause was ambiguous in that it prohibited the polic
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2004-12-21 · Published · cited 34× · 231 F.R.D. 268; 2004 WL 3119026
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER SCHENKIER, United States Magistrate Judge. Defendant, Peter Rogan (“Rogan”), has moved to compel the production of documents withheld under the attorney-client privilege (“privilege”) by plaintiff, Dexia Credit Local (“Dexia”), and non-party Edge-water Medical Center (“EMC”) (doc. # 122). For the reasons that follow, this motion is denied. I.
Ward v. Dodsonpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2002-07-01 · Published · cited 15× · 569 S.E.2d 554; 256 Ga. App. 660; 2002 Fulton County D. Rep. 2022; 2002 Ga. App. LEXIS 882
569 S.E.2d 554 (2002) 256 Ga. App. 660 WARD v. DODSON. No. A02A0426. Court of Appeals of Georgia. July 1, 2002. Reconsideration Denied July 24, 2002. *555 Carl A. Veline, Jr., Warner Robins, Waymon S. Harrell, Perry, for appellant. Cruser & Mitchell, William T. Mitchell, Atlanta
District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019-03-21 · Published · cited 14× · 367 F. Supp. 3d 219
WILLIAM H. PAULEY III, Senior United States District Judge The Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. (the "NRDC") brings claims under the Administrative Procedure Act (the "APA") to challenge the issuance of a directive by the Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (the "EPA"), which purportedly purges the EPA's advisory committees of scientists from academic and non-profit backgrounds in favor of those from ind
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018-09-14 · Published · cited 0× · 330 F. Supp. 3d 407
TIMOTHY J. KELLY, United States District Judge The Clean Air Act requires the Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA" or the "agency") to develop guidelines to regulate solid waste incinerators. It also provides a private right of action to sue EPA to enforce the law's statutory duties that are nondiscretionary. 42 U.S.C. § 7604
STEWART v. STATEpublic domain
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2016-04-26 · Published · cited 62× · 2016 OK CR 9; 372 P.3d 508; 2016 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 9; 2016 WL 1700602
OSCN Found Document:STEWART v. STATE OSCN navigation Home Courts Court Dockets
Mosley v. Statepublic domain
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2009-03-19 · Published · cited 8× · 675 S.E.2d 607; 296 Ga. App. 746; 2009 Fulton County D. Rep. 1071; 2009 Ga. App. LEXIS 324
675 S.E.2d 607 (2009) MOSLEY v. The STATE. No. A08A2403. Court of Appeals of Georgia. March 19, 2009. *609 Glynn R. Stepp, for appellant. Daniel J. Porter, District Attorney, Jeanette J. Fitzpatrick, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee. BERNES, Judge. Following a jury trial, Robert Anthony Mosley appeal