Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Andrea L Talbert”
State v. Talbertpublic domain
SMITH, Judge. Defendant appeals from his conviction by a jury of two counts of selling cocaine, a controlled substance and his two consecutive seven year sentences imposed by the court. He also appeals from the dismissal of his Rule 29.15 post-conviction motion without an evidentiary hearing. *749Defendant was convicted of two sales of cocaine to un
Brown v. CSX Transportation, Inc.public domain
363 F.Supp.2d 1342 (2005) Michael W. BROWN, Plaintiff, v. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff, v. Steelcase, Inc., a Michigan Corporation, and Perdue, Inc., a Florida Corporation, Third-Party Defendants. No. 3:04-CV-161-J-HTS. United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Jacksonville Division. March 24, 2005.
308 F.3d 1233 Donald O'CONNOR, et al., Plaintiffs, andBenjamin M. Aban, Donald N. Adaniya, Rolando R. Alvarado, Joseph A. Alvitre, Larry Andrews, Jeannett Armstrong, Robert G. Ashmore, Lee E. Austin, David K. Bahl, Lawrence R. Barron, Kenneth R. Battle, Jeanette Binion, Royce Binion, Eleanor M. Bishop, Gaetane M. Boutin, Thomas R. Boyden, Deena J. Bradshaw, Shadrach Breaux, Stephen G. Broich, Michael C. Brown, Yulanda S. Brown, David S. Buchana
FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit PUBLISH July 19, 2013 Elisabeth A. Shumaker UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Clerk of Court TENTH CIRCUIT STATE OF OKLA
State v. Burnhampublic domain
CHAISSON, J. hln this appeal, defendant, Rockey Burnham, challenges the sufficiency of the evidence used to convict him of fourth offense driving while intoxicated. For the reasons set forth herein, we affirm defendant’s conviction and sentence and remand the matter with instructions. *472PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On June 9, 2015, the
J.H. v. Superior Court of San Luis Obispo Cnty.public domain
TANGEMAN, J. *148*533In People v. Sanchez (2016) 63 Cal.4th 665,
J.H. v. Superior Courtpublic domain
Filed 2/15/18 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SIX J.H., 2d Juv. No. B284802 (Super. Ct. No. 16JD00154) Petitioner, (San Luis Obispo County) v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY, Respondent; SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY DEPARTMENT
State v. Stewartpublic domain
|,JAMES L. CANNELLA, Judge. Defendant, Vincent T. Stewart, appeals from his guilty plea convictions of two counts of possession of cocaine and his sentences, on count one to seven years imprisonment at hard labor as a habitual offender and on count two to five years imprisonment at hard labor, to run consec*269utively. For the reasons which follow, we dismiss the appe
Atlantic Richfield Co. v. United Statespublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES A. PARKER, SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This lawsuit involves a dispute over who must pay for environmental cleanup and remediation at the Jackpile Paguate uranium mine, located in Cibola County, New Mexico within the boundaries of the Pueblo of Laguna. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recently listed the mine on the National Priorities List (NPL), 40 C.F.
Judgment rendered April 14, 2021. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 2166, La. C.C.P. No. 53,820-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA ***** GOODRICH PETROLEUM Plaintiff
Hauge v. Rikkerspublic domain
WUEST, Justice. Susan Rikkers (a/k/a Susan Hauge) appeals from the circuit court’s order that her two youngest children remain in the custody of their natural father, Susan’s first husband. We reverse and remand for findings of fact to support the court’s order. James and Susan Hauge were married on June 1, 1971. They had three children: Ashley, born November 8, 1971; Amy, born November 21, 1976; and Andre
State v. Perkinspublic domain
[Cite as State v. Perkins, 2009-Ohio-6722.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT SENECA COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, CASE NO. 13-09-14 v. WILLIAM H. PERKINS, OPINION DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. STATE OF OHIO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, CASE NO. 13-09-15
Obligating Carryover Funds in Violation of OMB Zero-Dollar Apportionment Rule At least in circumstances where an agency fails to submit an apportionment request for carryover funds to the Office of Management and Budget before the start of a fiscal year, the automatic zero-dollar apportionment effected by section 120.57 of OMB Cir- cular A-11 is a valid apportionment for purposes of the Anti-Deficiency Act. As a re- sult, in such circumstances, 31 U.S.C. §
State v. Faulknerpublic domain
103 S.W.3d 346 (2003) STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Glenn E. FAULKNER, Appellant. No. 24851. Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division One. March 27, 2003. Motion for Rehearing or Transfer Denied April 18, 2003. Application for Transfer Denied May 27, 2003. *350 Emmett D. Queener
MEMORANDUM NOCE, United States Magistrate Judge. This action is before the Court sua sponte for reconsideration of the findings of the Court, made orally on the record on November 16, 1995, concerning the counterclaim of petitioner American River Transportation Company against claimant Gary Holbert for salvage damages. On that date, also orally on the record, the Court entered judgment on parti
State Ex Rel. Sundquist v. Minnesota Teamsters Public & Law Enforcement Employees Union Local No. 320public domain
316 N.W.2d 542 (1982) In the Matter of Arbitration Between: STATE of Minnesota, by Barbara SUNDQUIST, its Commissioner of the Department of Employee Relations, petitioner, Respondent, v. MINNESOTA TEAMSTERS PUBLIC AND LAW ENFORCEMENT EMPLOYEES UNION LOCAL NO. 320, and Thomas Lindgren, Appellant. No. 81-121. Supreme Court of Minnesota. March 5, 1982.
AIA Engineering Ltd. v. Magotteaux International S/Apublic domain
LOURIE, Circuit Judge. Magotteaux International S/A and Magotteaux, Inc., (together, “Magotteaux”) appeal from the holding of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee on summary judgment that the asserted claims of U.S. Patent RE39,998 (the “RE'998 patent”) are invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 251 for impermissibly recapturing subject matter surrendered during reissue examination. AIA Eng’g <
Aia Engineering Ltd. v. Magotteaux Intern. S/Apublic domain
657 F.3d 1264 (2011) AIA ENGINEERING LIMITED, Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee, and Vega Industries, Ltd., Inc., Third Party Defendant-Appellee, v. MAGOTTEAUX INTERNATIONAL S/A and Magotteaux, Inc., Defendants/Counterclaim Plaintiffs-Appellants. No. 2011-1058. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. August 31, 2011.
In Re McCollampublic domain
612 So.2d 572 (1993) In re Paula L. McCOLLAM, Debtor. Thomas E. LeCroy, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Paul L. McCOLLAM, Defendant-Appellee. No. 79495. Supreme Court of Florida. January 28, 1993. Theodore A. Jewell of Stearns, Weaver, Miller, Weissler, Alhadeff & Sitterson, P.A., Miami, for plaintiff-appellant. Leslie G. Cloyd of Ackerman, Bakst, Lauer &
State v. Russellpublic domain
607 So.2d 689 (1992) STATE of Louisiana v. Walter L. RUSSELL and Sherman Sheridan. No. 91-KA-2264. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit. October 15, 1992. Harry Connick, Dist. Atty., Valerie Welz, Asst. Dist. Atty., New Orleans, for appellee. M. Craig Colwart, Orleans Indigent Defender Program, New Orleans, for appellants.